Channel
@simple_details
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
90,000subscribers
-1,927 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001413011740 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @simple_details |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 37 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/simple_details |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026, 18:26 | 90,000 | -42 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 23:57 | 90,042 | -79 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 19:21 | 90,121 | -140 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 11:22 | 90,261 | -492 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 01:58 | 90,753 | -97 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 21:56 | 90,850 | -59 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 90,909 | -47 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 90,956 | -6 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 10:59 | 90,962 | -93 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 04:58 | 91,055 | -68 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:57 | 91,123 | -44 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:03 | 91,167 | -46 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:58 | 91,213 | -40 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:06 | 91,253 | -22 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:37 | 91,275 | -13 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 91,288 | -25 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 91,313 | -61 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:54 | 91,374 | -18 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:06 | 91,392 | -19 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:44 | 91,411 | first reading |
235 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 174 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 235 (1 August 2026 – 13 October 2026) |
| Views total | 612,043 |
| Reactions total | 12,189 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Oct 2026, 16:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
32,749 reactions across 232 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28,537 | 87.1% | |
| 💘 | 1,856 | 5.67% | |
| 😢 | 1,158 | 3.54% | |
| 🥰 | 699 | 2.13% | |
| 🕊 | 475 | 1.45% | |
| 🆒 | 24 | 0.073% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 232 of the 235 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32,749 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 235 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 13 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @simple_details. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 235 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 13 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
أعتقد مفيش أجمل من إن الإنسان يرافق شخص بيشبهه في أفكاره ومبادئه، ساعتها بس الواحد بيحس نفسه خفيف وكأن كل شيء حواليه بيدعوه إنه يطمن! نعيم لا يُمل منه! الله يؤنس وحشتنا بمن يُشبه أرواحنا.
❤53🕊6
انت لو مكنتش نجحت مكنتش هتبقي مضغوط كده.. الضغط اللي انت حاسس بيه دلوقتي ومضايقك "امتياز حصري" .. اللي بيحس بالضغط هو الشخص اللي يُعتمد عليه .. شخص التوقعات فيه كبيره .. شخص وجوده ليه قيمة .. شخص عنده هدف وطموح يعني ببساطة لو لقيت نفسك مش تحت الضغط.. اعرف انك ملكش لازمه .
❤95🥰11💘6🕊1
الإنسان لمَّا بيفكَّر في الجنَّة بيعجَز عن إنُّه يكمِّل تفكير! تخيّل فكرة -الخلود- نفسها … والحياة الأبديَّة، والعطاء الواسع الَّذي لا ينقطع من الحبّ والطَّعام والأنس والسَّعادة والفرح. أكيد الجنَّة تستحِقّ كلّ عناء الدُّنيَا… ٱللَّهُمَّ أعنَّا ودلَّنا على طريقها وارزقنا إيَّاها يا ربّ.
❤105🥰6🕊1
ولَا أُبالي ولو ضَاقَت بِمَا رَحُبَت وَلِي برَحبِكَ مِحرَابٌ، ومُعتَكف..🤍 https://t.me/taiifk
❤12🆒2🕊1🥰1
أسألُ الله أن أكونَ أمَّ شيخٍ يحبُّه اللهُ ورسولُه، بارًّا صالحًا، ربانيًّا، حسنَ الصوتِ بتلاوةِ القرآن، أُصلِّي وراءه في المساجد، وأقول: هذا الشيخُ ابني.
❤104🥰2🆒2🕊1
ولا تبتليني في مطالبي واجبرني في الأشياء التي أقصدها وأسعى إليها. وامنن عليَّ بلطفك في كل خطوة وامنن عليَّ بقرّة عينٍ غير منقطعة وارزقني نور البصيرة ووفقني للخير الخير الذي ترضاه لي وتحبه وارضَ عني ارضَ عني رضًا لا أشقى بعده أبدًا يا ربّ.
❤109💘6🥰6🆒2🕊1
لا بأس.. سنحاول حتّى آخر لحظة.. حتّى وإن قصّرنا كثيرًا، نستمرّ في المحاولة، عسى الله أن يغفر لنا التّقصير باعترافنا به! نحاول.. حتّى آخر دقيقة، بكلّ ما لدينا، وإن ضاعت دقائق كثيرةٌ ماضية.. لا بأس، نحاول.. حتّى وإن أيْقنّا أنّ محاولاتنا ضئيلةٌ قليلةُ المردود وأنّنا لن نصل إلى ما نريد، نحاول.. "ما فات مات"، وكثرةُ الالتفات تضيعُ ما هو آت.. لذا لنحاول، طالما أنّ الوقت لَم ينفد بعد.. نحاول، ونقاوم فقدان الأمل الذي يتسر…
❤79💘6🥰5🕊3🆒1
كلما اشتدّ عليّ الحزن ناديت يا الله سبحانك ربي ما دعوتك إلا شرحت صدري وما أذنبتُ إلا سترتني وما ضاقت بي الدنيا إلا رحمتني رحمة أوسع من رحمة أمي لا إله إلا أنت إني عبدك التائه فاهد قلبي إليك ولا تكلني إلى نفسي طرفة عين.
❤83😢14🕊1
أذكِّرُ نفسي وإيَّاكُم " إن حتي وانت متوكل علي الله ، هيكون فيه شعور بالخوف في قلبك ، هيشتد في الأول ، وهيبدأ يخف مع الوقت ، وهيرجع يزورك من فترة للتانية ، لحد ما تحل مكانه الطمأنينة والسكينة ويقر الله عينك بمرادَك "
❤92💘13😢3🕊1🥰1
أرجو ان تَكون النِهاية سَعيدة فِي مَكانٍ مَا سَأصل إليهِ يَومًا وَانْ تَنتهي جَولتِي مِنْ الرَّكض وراءَ احلامِي بِنيْلها لَا بِالنَدمِ عَليها وَانْ تستَحق الوُجهَة الأخيِرة عَناء الوصُول إلَيها مُنذ البِداية .
❤117🥰5🕊4
أن يأتي يوم أقول فيه أني وأخيرًا نسيت كيف يشعر المرء بالخوف من شدة ما سكنني من أمان.. آمين ألف مرة يارب.)"
❤111🕊2
في فرق كبير بين النصيحة المُخلصة وبين التنظير .. الأولى حب والتانية غل .. الأولى مقبولة ومطلوبة والتانية مرفوضة ومقرفة الحقيقة …
❤92💘7🥰5
Showing the 12 most recent of 235 posts we hold for @simple_details. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@simple_details edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 17 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The sun will rise and we will try again” (@simple_details), 90,000 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/simple_details.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.