Channel
@Rawwda
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
229,759subscribers
-280 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001284638128 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Rawwda |
| Description | وما كلّ ما تحسُّه واضِحٌ في نفسِك تستطيع أن تُحسن الإبانة عنه، لكنّك قد تلتمسه في اقتباسٍ أدبيّ. ____________ للتواصل معنا: @Rawdat_Aladab_bot رابط القناة: https://t.me/Rawwda صفحتنا على الفيسبوك: https://www.facebook.com/share/1EF1u3z1WK/ |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 23 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Rawwda |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 229,759 | -41 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:07 | 229,800 | -48 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:37 | 229,848 | +30 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 229,818 | -8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 229,826 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:48 | 229,833 | -27 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:24 | 229,860 | -49 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 229,909 | -83 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:55 | 229,992 | -22 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 230,014 | +38 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 23:09 | 229,976 | +37 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 229,939 | +9 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:13 | 229,930 | -49 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 12:24 | 229,979 | +7 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:58 | 229,972 | +7 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 229,965 | -15 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:28 | 229,980 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:57 | 229,983 | +37 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 229,946 | -24 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:06 | 229,970 | first reading |
310 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 310 (5 August 2026 – 30 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,835,583 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Aug 2026, 13:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 27 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
فقد يرىٰ الإنسانُ الطريقَ واضحًا، ثم لا يبلغه؛ لأنّ السيرَ إلى المقاصد ليس بالقوّة وحدها، بل بمعونةٍ خفيّةٍ من الله لذا قال الرافعيّ: «وكلُّ سهلٍ، إذا لم يُوفَّقِ اللهُ، صعبُ».
Signed شُرُوقْ هَانِي.
تأخذنا الحياة ذات اليمين وذات الشمال حتى توحشَ قلوبَنا وتُظلمَ دروبَنا، ثم يبعثُ اللّٰهُ إلينا من يأخذ بيدنا ونأخذ بيده، فننيرُ عتمتَهُ كما يُنيرُنا ونؤنسُ وَحشتَه كما يؤنسنا، إلى أن تدبّ فينا الحياة من جديد ونرى كل يومٍ كأنّه عيد حتى وإن كان فارغًا من الدهشة ومزدحمًا بالمُضنيات.. فشخصٌ واحدٌ قد يكون حياة. - عماد عيد.
Signed آية عادل.
حذيفة العرجي قال: «لو أنَّ عُمري يعودُ الآنَ.. عُدتُ بهِ كَي لا أُحِبُّ ولا أُهدي الهوىٰ أحدا!» ذكّرني بمقولة ابن الجوزي الشهيرة: «مَا زَالَ الْهَوَىٰ يذِلُّ أَهْلَ الْعِزِّ!»
Signed أمنية فكري.
صباحُ الخيرِ.. «والإنسانُ عندَ الناس بهيئة وجهه وحليته التي تبدو عليه، ولكنه عند الله بهيئة قلبه وظنّه الذي يظن به».
Signed آية عادل.
{هُوَ الَّذِي أَنزَلَ السَّكِينَةَ فِي قُلُوبِ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ لِيَزْدَادُوا إِيمَانًا مَّعَ إِيمَانِهِمْ} #قرآن_الصباح
Signed أمنية فكري.
«يحاسب الإنسان على الكلمة؛ لأنها تقيم عدلا أو تهدمه وتحفظ حبًا أو تضيّعه وتدحض باطلًا أو تقيمه وتنقذ إنسانا أو تهلكه... ومن الكلمة ما يحيي ويميت، وبها تنقذ غريقًا من وحل أفكاره أو تغرقه فيما هو فيه أكثر. ورحم الله امرأ يَعي كلامه قبل أن يلفظ به».
Signed حُبَابَة•
سلوىٰ المؤمن أنَّهُ مأجورٌ على كُلِّ آهٍ يئنُّ بها! وعزاؤهُ أنَّها دُنيا.
Signed شُرُوقْ هَانِي.
يقول المُتنبي: «فإن يكنِ الفعلُ الذي ساءَ واحدًا فأفعالُهُ اللائي سررنَ أُلُوفُ». وفي هذا يقولُ العلَّامة محمود شاكر: «إن الرجلَ إذا أحبَّ، وأخلَص الحبَّ؛ لم يحوِّلهُ شيءٌ عن حبِّه!»
Signed جُولّنار :)
بشـرى سـارررة لطلاب العلم الشرعي...⚡️🎉 هل تبحث عن مسار علمي منهجي، دراسة ميسّرة، ومتابعة علمية مستمرة❔ يسر مدرسة رباط الحنابلة أن تعلن عن فتح باب التسجيل في مسارها العلمي المنهجي↩ بإشراف فضيلة الشيخ العلامة..... تــابعوووا المزيد من هنااا https://t.me/Trkis_Ahmad/3812 https://t.me/Trkis_Ahmad/3812
Signed ،
"تمُرّ بالمرءِ أيامٌ يُحِسّ فيها أنّه يتنفّس من خرم إبرة من الهمّ أو الألم، فإذا بمضيّ الأيّام وتتابعها يطوي صفحة تِلك المعاناة فتنفرِجُ الحال وتتّسع من تلقائها.. إنّ الاستبسال في مقاومة الأحزان قد يزيدُ أمدها، فتكون الوسيلة الأفضل: اترُكها للأيام وستُذهلك بأن تطويها كأن لم تكُن!" وصدق القائل: "تَسلَّ عنِ الهمومِ فليس شيءٌ يُقيمُ فما همومُكَ بِالمُقيمة"
Signed أمنية فكري.
«بعد التعقّل والتأمّل تُدرك أن جُهدك في مُغالبة طبعك هو أحد ابتلاءاتك، فقد خلقك الله على عجلة وضعف وهلع، ووضعك في كَبدٍ تُكابده طوال حياتك، فتعبك في ترويض نفسك وتصبيرها ومغالبتها هو ثمن إنسانيتك وهو ذاته طوق نجاتك».
Signed شُرُوقْ هَانِي.
ها نحن ذا نكبرُ معًا مثل عائلةٍ سعيدة، أنت وأنا والمسافةُ التي بيننا. قيس عبد المغني.
Signed جُولّنار :)
Showing the 12 most recent of 310 posts we hold for @Rawwda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@Rawwda edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 7,093 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Rawwda named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 33 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رَوْضَةُ الأَدَبِ” (@Rawwda), 229,759 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Rawwda.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.