Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Blonde Mail

Channel

Blonde Mail

@annrsbb

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,507subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002188862389
TypeChannel
Username@annrsbb
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/annrsbb

Growth

1,5031,5091,5066 August 2026 — 1,505 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,505 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,508 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,509 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,506 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,509 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,507 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,506 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,503 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,507 subscribers1,5076 August 20267 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 32 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,502–1,510 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 11:011,507+4
2 Sept 2026, 13:431,503-3
30 Aug 2026, 16:271,506-1
27 Aug 2026, 23:061,507-2
24 Aug 2026, 19:341,509+3
21 Aug 2026, 15:081,506-3
18 Aug 2026, 20:071,509+1
9 Aug 2026, 14:171,508+3
6 Aug 2026, 07:361,505no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:331,505first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 28 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 48s
Average length
38s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

385 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
24262.9%
🔥6617.1%
❤‍🔥205.19%
🥰133.38%
💘92.34%
😱82.08%
😍71.82%
💋51.30%
🤩51.30%
🍓41.04%
🙏30.779%
👎20.519%
👍10.26%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 385 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @annrsbb. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 09:08 UTC246 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Мне недавно прислали бальзамы-блески для губ от бренда Nikk Mole. Это мое первое знакомство с брендом, и новинка мне очень понравилась! Приятная консистенция ,не липкие,хорошо увлажняют, и цвета очень красивые. Тут оттенок «мечта» И еще очень понравился коричневый оттенок «роскошь»(ну естественно)💅🏼 Румяна тут от бренда Moira оттенок “sweet on you”

11

4 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC399 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Новое вам лип комбо💅🏼 AVOEVODINA lip pencil 04 + Nikk Mole lip gloss “luxury”

21🤩5

30 Jul 2026, 09:18 UTC754 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Пробую необычные косметические продукты🔪 Тон в спрее MIXIT 01 Румяна Heror ange 05 Скульптор кремовый ANDPLUS Medium Тени AVOEVODINA Basic Matte Подводка кремовая PMKL Стразы алиэкспресс Тинт для губ Wonderskin Charming

17🍓4💘2

28 Jul 2026, 15:00 UTC710 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вот эта помада.Очень красивый цвет,на фото он серый,но в жизни светло бежевый. Стоит 150 рублей….

17

28 Jul 2026, 14:59 UTC710 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я не самый лучший пример «блогерства»,учитывая,как активно я веду тг канал,но зато не успеваю вам надоедать 🤣 во всем ищем плюсы! Недавно снимали с девочками творчество, что я использовала тут на Софии? Тон Clarins skin illusion очень невесомое влажное покрытие дает,но при этом имеет неплохую пигментированность. Для стрелки использовала коричневый тинт для бровей от Manly Pro и сверху прошлась тенями от Viseart Neu

16

7 Jul 2026, 15:19 UTC983 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Еще начала снимать рилсы с любимыми лип комбо. Тут карандаш от MAC “chestnut” и помада от ANDPLUS “brown”

23🥰8💋5❤‍🔥2🙏1

7 Jul 2026, 15:18 UTC883 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Я хотела попробовать что-то новое из масок,и подружка мне посоветовала такую от Arocell. Из плюсов не вызвало реакций на чувствительной коже,но увлажнения не хватило для склонной к сухости. Для жирной кожи,я думаю,будет супер

4

29 Jun 2026, 16:27 UTC≈1,020 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Кто давно подписан на канал,знает как я люблю SKINJESTIQUE 🖤 С моей аллергичной и чувствительной кожей всегда очень сложно подобрать уход. У Skinjestique всегда чистые и работающие составы,без аллергичных отдушек. Так вот, делюсь любимчиками: SPF и BB крем. Для SPF было главным критерием не только защита от солнца,но и чтобы на него хорошо ложилась тональная основа, а это частая беда. Этот SPF с этим отлично справля

7❤‍🔥3

25 Jun 2026, 14:45 UTC≈1,140 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Бренд Lic мне прислал большую пиар посылку,где был вот этот тон. Я про него совсем забыла,лет 5 назад постоянно себя им красила. Но уже тогда я поставила ему пятерочку. Вчера я снова его нанесла и опять очень сильно понравился! Он очень светлый и мне ,наконец, не пришлось добавлять аджастер …. Он средней плотности и пигментированности, но,что самое главное,весь день продержался идеально на моем лице и никуда не прова

22

18 Jun 2026, 16:22 UTC≈1,260 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Показываю самое стойкое лип комбо💄 У меня такой эффект держится сутки точно, насыщенность становится чуть меньше,конечно, но тем не менее ,продукт остается на месте Тут я использовала тинт-пленку от бренда Sacheu в оттенке 01 и гель-тинт от Luxvisage в оттенке 07

🔥238💘5

11 Jun 2026, 10:15 UTC≈1,270 views34 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Дала небольшое интервью для Marie Claire Italia 🖤

27🥰5🔥2

10 Jun 2026, 07:37 UTC≈1,050 views19 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @takida_37Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

19

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @annrsbb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Blonde Mail” (@annrsbb), 1,507 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/annrsbb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.