Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Таки да

Channel

Таки да

@takida_37

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

25,004subscribers

+26 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001711675627
TypeChannel
Username@takida_37
DescriptionCommercial/Pr: [email protected] Agent: Юля Высоцкая РКН № 4965509085
Created3 July 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/takida_37

Topic

Parenting & family — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

24,53725,07824,807.56 August 2026 — 24,978 subscribers6 August 2026 — 24,971 subscribers7 August 2026 — 24,955 subscribers8 August 2026 — 24,948 subscribers9 August 2026 — 25,065 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25,066 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25,065 subscribers13 August 2026 — 25,062 subscribers14 August 2026 — 25,063 subscribers16 August 2026 — 25,059 subscribers17 August 2026 — 25,063 subscribers18 August 2026 — 25,070 subscribers19 August 2026 — 25,078 subscribers20 August 2026 — 25,069 subscribers21 August 2026 — 25,068 subscribers23 August 2026 — 25,055 subscribers24 August 2026 — 25,020 subscribers25 August 2026 — 25,023 subscribers26 August 2026 — 25,015 subscribers27 August 2026 — 25,009 subscribers28 August 2026 — 24,998 subscribers29 August 2026 — 24,995 subscribers30 August 2026 — 24,991 subscribers31 August 2026 — 24,972 subscribers1 September 2026 — 24,956 subscribers3 September 2026 — 24,943 subscribers4 September 2026 — 24,914 subscribers7 September 2026 — 24,880 subscribers10 September 2026 — 24,857 subscribers12 September 2026 — 24,847 subscribers14 September 2026 — 24,833 subscribers16 September 2026 — 24,811 subscribers18 September 2026 — 24,781 subscribers1 October 2026 — 24,617 subscribers6 October 2026 — 24,555 subscribers10 October 2026 — 24,672 subscribers13 October 2026 — 24,661 subscribers15 October 2026 — 24,643 subscribers15 October 2026 — 24,633 subscribers17 October 2026 — 24,630 subscribers18 October 2026 — 24,632 subscribers19 October 2026 — 24,628 subscribers20 October 2026 — 24,607 subscribers21 October 2026 — 24,612 subscribers22 October 2026 — 24,598 subscribers23 October 2026 — 24,585 subscribers24 October 2026 — 24,580 subscribers25 October 2026 — 24,576 subscribers26 October 2026 — 24,567 subscribers27 October 2026 — 24,564 subscribers28 October 2026 — 24,557 subscribers29 October 2026 — 24,551 subscribers30 October 2026 — 24,537 subscribers1 November 2026 — 24,651 subscribers2 November 2026 — 24,770 subscribers3 November 2026 — 24,842 subscribers3 November 2026 — 24,897 subscribers5 November 2026 — 24,948 subscribers6 November 2026 — 25,004 subscribers25,0046 August 20266 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 92 days, net +26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,456–25,159 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 00:3525,004+56
5 Nov 2026, 01:0924,948+51
3 Nov 2026, 23:0824,897+55
3 Nov 2026, 02:2624,842+72
2 Nov 2026, 02:1024,770+119
1 Nov 2026, 00:5624,651+114
30 Oct 2026, 23:1024,537-14
29 Oct 2026, 22:3824,551-6
28 Oct 2026, 21:4524,557-7
27 Oct 2026, 19:1624,564-3
26 Oct 2026, 18:5824,567-9
25 Oct 2026, 19:3824,576-4
24 Oct 2026, 19:0724,580-5
23 Oct 2026, 18:5724,585-13
22 Oct 2026, 16:5624,598-14
21 Oct 2026, 11:0624,612+5
20 Oct 2026, 07:5624,607-21
19 Oct 2026, 05:4724,628-4
18 Oct 2026, 03:1424,632+2
17 Oct 2026, 02:0624,630first reading

Engagement

208 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 126 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.0%
avg views ÷ 25,004 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,500
72 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
72
of 208 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held208 (31 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total756,240
Reactions total46,932
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 02:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,530
Videos
≈955
Links
≈333

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5m 48s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

115,003 reactions across 201 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 524903702459739348839,30434.2%
custom 524945115822897744429,74325.9%
custom 525150253768875887318,22615.8%
custom 525165930829002881915,05013.1%
custom 525137174304969497012,68011.0%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 207 of the 208 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 117,910 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 208 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
356
across the posts below
Posts paid on
58
of 207 we hold a reading for · 28%
Most on one post
55
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @takida_37. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 208 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 72 posts held from the last 30 days (8.33%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 20:48 UTC≈3,560 views216 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026
Photo

среда

custom 5249037024597393488120custom 525137174304969497049custom 524945115822897744447

5 Nov 2026, 09:44 UTC≈6,780 views686 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Я прекрасна

custom 5249037024597393488405custom 5249451158228977444159custom 5251502537688758873107custom 52516593082900288198custom 52513717430496949707

5 Nov 2026, 05:12 UTC≈7,900 views283 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Мы вчера в Оригинале

custom 5249451158228977444165custom 524903702459739348862custom 525137174304969497055custom 52515025376887588731

5 Nov 2026, 05:11 UTC≈7,830 views341 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @neofolkthreadPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 5249451158228977444166custom 525150253768875887392custom 524903702459739348863custom 525165930829002881919custom 52513717430496949701

4 Nov 2026, 21:06 UTC≈8,460 views440 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Разрыв кабины 12.12 🤝

custom 5249451158228977444247custom 5251659308290028819107custom 524903702459739348873custom 52515025376887588738custom 52513717430496949705

4 Nov 2026, 19:22 UTC≈8,690 views352 reactions10 Starsread 6 November 2026

Выпускной 2026

custom 5249451158228977444220custom 525150253768875887369custom 525165930829002881951custom 52490370245973934889custom 52513717430496949703

4 Nov 2026, 19:21 UTC≈7,050 views278 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @loudhouseVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 5251502537688758873132custom 524945115822897744492custom 524903702459739348848custom 52516593082900288196

4 Nov 2026, 07:44 UTC≈11,300 views918 reactions50 Starsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🫡

custom 5249451158228977444616custom 5249037024597393488159custom 5251502537688758873117custom 525165930829002881914custom 525137174304969497012

3 Nov 2026, 19:57 UTC≈8,720 views386 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 5249037024597393488167custom 5251371743049694970105custom 524945115822897744485custom 525150253768875887323custom 52516593082900288196

3 Nov 2026, 19:52 UTC≈8,810 views564 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Приезжаю я значит в Studio Slow, все мне улыбаются, я всем тоже. И тут внезапно тарантиновский диалог: - а мы думали, вы в новый магазин приедете, вас там ждут 🙂 - а я что? Не в новом? 🙂 - нет🙂 -🙂🥲 Так я узнала, что в Москве уже целых два больших Studio Slow. Спасибо ребятам, что дождались меня, все показали и отобрали, как всегда самое лучшее. ЛЮБЛЮ БЕСКОНЕЧНО

custom 5249451158228977444328custom 5249037024597393488117custom 5251371743049694970111custom 52515025376887588734custom 52516593082900288194

3 Nov 2026, 14:45 UTC≈8,540 views1,212 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Serbia 2026

custom 5249451158228977444723custom 5249037024597393488264custom 5251371743049694970193custom 525150253768875887316custom 525165930829002881916

3 Nov 2026, 14:14 UTC≈8,930 views1,510 reactions3 Starsread 5 November 2026
Photo

😭

custom 5249037024597393488907custom 5249451158228977444351custom 5251659308290028819231custom 525137174304969497011custom 525150253768875887310

Showing the 12 most recent of 208 posts we hold for @takida_37. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@takida_37 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
2 October 2026
Most recent edit
2 October 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @takida_37 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
2 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
2 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
35 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Таки да” (@takida_37), 25,004 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/takida_37.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.