Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ⛔️ АнтиКоррупция по ISO 37001

Channel

⛔️ АнтиКоррупция по ISO 37001

@anticorruption_ISO_37001

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,880subscribers

+61 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001533043500
TypeChannel
Username@anticorruption_ISO_37001
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/anticorruption_ISO_37001

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,8191,8801,849.57 August 2026 — 1,819 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,819 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,821 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,819 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,820 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,828 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,836 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,842 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,843 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,837 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,869 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,880 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 42 days, net +61. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,810–1,889 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 23:551,880+11
11 Sept 2026, 00:191,869+32
6 Sept 2026, 06:161,837-6
2 Sept 2026, 02:151,843+1
30 Aug 2026, 02:241,842+6
24 Aug 2026, 11:251,836+8
20 Aug 2026, 14:051,828+8
17 Aug 2026, 11:491,820+1
13 Aug 2026, 22:371,819-2
10 Aug 2026, 16:311,821+2
8 Aug 2026, 01:311,819no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:471,819first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 15s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

534 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥16530.9%
👍15529.0%
😁11922.3%
💯6812.7%
👏224.12%
🤔30.562%
😢20.375%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 534 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC458 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Рекогносцировочная модель расчёта индекса коррупционных рисков в сфере строительства и ремонта городской инфраструктуры (построена на принципе риск-ориентированного подхода стандартов ISO 31000, ISO 37001, ISO 37003) Индикаторы: 1. Оплата невыполненных или частично выполненных работ — 11 баллов 2. Использование материалов более низкого качества — 9 баллов 3. Необоснованное увеличение стоимости проекта — 8 баллов 4.

👍14💯1

4 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC≈1,860 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Стандарт ISO 37001 требует, чтобы персонал был хорошо осведомлён об ответственности за нарушение антикоррупционной политики... И чем наглядней объяснение, тем лучше... 😀 @anticorruption_ISO_37001

😁17🔥6👍5

2 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC≈1,870 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

... - о коррупции в образовательной сфере... @anticorruption_ISO_37001

🔥7💯6👍4

31 Jul 2026, 06:03 UTC≈1,250 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Дмитрий Лихачёв (1906-1999) Академик АН СССР Скупой может притвориться щедрым, злой человек может притвориться добряком, льстец может преподносить свою лесть под флагом правдивости, но притвориться интеллигентным человеком нельзя, невозможно. Вот между прочим, почему интеллигентность вызывает такую злобу в неинтеллигентных людях... @anticorruption_ISO_37001

👍9💯8🔥6👏1

24 Jul 2026, 05:30 UTC≈1,260 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Параллельное проектирование - это когда стройка, закупки материалов и проектирование идут одновременно. И иногда это действительно оправдано: для сложных уникальных объектов вроде аэропортов, электростанций, мостов в связке с BIM (Building Information Modeling) и когда есть нормальное управление изменениями. Но чаще это хороший повод выиграть в сроках и избежать лишнего контроля. Потому что контроль мешает - требует

🔥10👍9💯2

21 Jul 2026, 06:04 UTC≈2,230 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

... - мы сами виноваты... 😀 @anticorruption_ISO_37001

😁10👍7🔥6

18 Jul 2026, 09:00 UTC≈1,170 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Пост про Килиане Мбаппе продолжает набирать просмотры https://t.me/anticorruption_ISO_37001/356

🔥9👍7💯6

16 Jul 2026, 05:32 UTC≈1,370 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Чем отличается показатель коррупции от индикатора коррупции? Давайте разберём на примере автомобиля. Представьте, что вы водитель автомобиля. На панели приборов есть показатели, а есть индикаторы. Показатели автомобиля - показывают, что в данный момент происходит с автомобилем, например: - скорость — 90 км/ч; - расход топлива — 8,5 л/100 км; - пробег — 120 000 км; - обороты двигателя — 2 500 об/мин; - температура о

👍12🔥7👏6

14 Jul 2026, 05:34 UTC≈1,540 views53 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Известный математик Израиль Моисеевич Гельфанд (1913-2009) говорил: "Люди думают, что не понимают математику, но всё зависит от того, как объяснять. Если вы спросите пьяницу, какое число больше - 2/3 или 3/5, он не сможет вам сказать. Но если вы переформулируете вопрос: "Что лучше, две бутылки водки на троих или три бутылки на пятерых, то он сразу же ответит: "Конечно, две бутылки на троих". Так и в антикоррупции. К

🔥39👍8💯6

13 Jul 2026, 05:34 UTC≈2,200 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

... - Антикоррупционная культура — это не страх, что на тебя "напишут", а привычка не говорить и не делать того, за что действительно могут написать... @anticorruption_ISO_37001

😁7👍5🔥4

9 Jul 2026, 11:40 UTC≈1,090 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @forensicUKPhoto

⚖ Коррупционные преступления: перечень закреплён законом, ответственность усилена Принят Закон Республики Узбекистан от 22 июня 2026 года № ЗРУ-1155 «О внесении дополнений и изменений в некоторые законодательные акты Республики Узбекистан, направленных на повышение эффективности борьбы с коррупцией и обеспечение неотвратимости ответственности за коррупционные преступления» 📌 Что изменилось? В Уголовный кодекс Респ

🔥15👍10

6 Jul 2026, 04:45 UTC≈1,460 views49 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Памятка для руководителя госорганизации: Как подготовиться к сертификации по ISO 37001 - Для начала приобретите большой шкаф и побольше папок для документов. - Выберите любого сотрудника и назначьте его ответственным по антикоррупции. Скажите ему, что теперь он лично отвечает за борьбу с коррупцией в организации, но главное, чтобы он никого не отвлекал от работы. Постепенно загружайте его различными задачами - вст

😁32💯6👏5👍4🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @anticorruption_ISO_37001. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⛔️ АнтиКоррупция по ISO 37001” (@anticorruption_ISO_37001), 1,880 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anticorruption_ISO_37001.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.