Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net -74. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,411–6,507 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 11:39
6,422
-1
13 Sept 2026, 11:16
6,423
-17
9 Sept 2026, 18:00
6,440
-9
4 Sept 2026, 13:17
6,449
-6
31 Aug 2026, 21:13
6,455
-3
29 Aug 2026, 02:36
6,458
-2
25 Aug 2026, 22:45
6,460
-5
23 Aug 2026, 05:28
6,465
-5
19 Aug 2026, 14:51
6,470
-13
16 Aug 2026, 19:44
6,483
-1
13 Aug 2026, 04:25
6,484
-2
9 Aug 2026, 22:11
6,486
-7
6 Aug 2026, 16:08
6,493
-3
6 Aug 2026, 04:16
6,496
first reading
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 29 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 30s
Average length
1m 50s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,167 reactions across 26 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
511
43.8%
👎
218
18.7%
😁
165
14.1%
🤮
101
8.65%
❤
81
6.94%
👏
68
5.83%
😱
14
1.20%
🤔
5
0.428%
👌
4
0.343%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,204 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
میپرسه مارکو دیگه دنبال براندازی جمهوری اسلامی نیستی؟
پاسخ: نه واقعا. من رفتن جمهوری اسلامی رو در چهارچوب گذار به سمت یک رژیم کاملا دموکراتیک و مستقل و صرفا در چهارچوب مصلحت ایرانی صلاح می دونستم اما جریانات دی ماه بهم ثابت کرد جریان جمهوری خواه فعلا توان لازم برای مدیریت گذار امن رو نداره و جریان پلشت و متحجر پهلوی چی با حمایت خارجی قطعا گذار رو به بیراهه میبره و استقلال و امنیت ملی ایران قطعا به خطر میافته و خبری ه…
⭕️جان هادسون، خبرنگار واشنگتنپست، ویدیوی دقیقتری از سفر اخیر ترامپ به ترکیه منتشر کرده که نشان می دهد ترامپ برای خروج مخفیانه از ترکیه، برای جلوگیری از ترور احتمالی با یک کامیون حمل غذا از هواپیمای اصلی خارج و به یک هواپیمای نظامی منتقل شده!
@antioligarchie
#نقد_و_نظر
⭕️...اول کسی مثل لاریجانی در این جایگاه قرار میگیرد. فردی که خودش وزن و سابقه سیاسی دارد، میتواند با جناحهای مختلف مذاکره کند و تا حدی ابتکار عمل شخصی داشته باشد. بنابراین خودش هم بخشی از معادله است.
هرچه از لاریجانی فاصله میگیریم و به ذوالقدر و بعد رضایی میرسیم، به نظر میرسد از «بازیگر سیاسی» به «هماهنگکننده سیاسی» نزدیکتر میشویم.
در مورد رضایی، دستکم در این جایگاه، بیشتر با کسی روبهرو هست…
اینکه میبینید همه با جمهوری اسلامی مشکل دارن لزوما بخاطر بدی جمهوری اسلامی میتونه نباشه، وقتی شما با هژمون قالب درگیر بشی زیر هژمون ها همگی باهات مشکل خواهند داشت. طبیعیه، ربطی هم به شعار مرگ بر آمریکا و مرگ بر اسراییل نداره. حتی اگه یه جمهوری لیبرال هم بودیم اما عزم چالش با هژمون رو کرده بودیم همین اتفاق به شکل مشابهی می تونست اتفاق بیافته.
💢 مارکوپولو
@antioligarchie
#نقد_و_نظر
⭕️یکی از تبعات مهم جنگ رمضان آن بود که عربستان متوجه شد که اتکای به آمریکا به عنوان قدرت خارجی، لزوما ایجاد بازدارندگی نمی کند و امنیت آور نیست و باید به منطقه پیرامونی هم اهمیت داد. یکی دیگر از تبعات جنگ هم این بود که ایران متوجه شد بیش از پیش باید متوجه همسایگان خودش باشد!
🀄️سیدمهدی دزفولی
#twitter
@antioligarchie
ترکیه، پاکستان و عربستان پیمان امنیتی نوشتن. می دونید این اقدام الان چه معنی میده؟ این اقدام در واقع اعتراف رسمی به از بین رفتن نظم منطقه ای قبلی به ریاست آمریکا و لزوم ترسیم نظم جدید در قبال قلدر جدید منطقه ایرانه. وارد دوران جدیدی شدیم!
💢 مارکوپولو
@antioligarchie
⭕️این استاد ژاپنی دارد درباره آموزش و پرورش در ایران توضیح می دهد .
جنگ تاثیر زیادی در تغییر نوع نگاه مردم سایر کشورها به ایران داشته است.
@antioligarchie
#نقد_و_نظر
⭕️پاییز سال ۱۳۶۳ در اوج دفاع مقدس گروهی که امروزه شدهاند اصلاح طلب
برای به انحراف کشاندن جنگ، شکستن وحدت مردم و تصاحب قدرت، در میادین نبرد و جبههها، شروع به اختلاف افکنی کردند و درخواست برکناری برخی فرماندهان اصلی جنگ را دادند.
حضرت امام خمینی، در پیامی صریح و تند، نیات آنها را افشا و محکوم کرد و نکته مهمی فرمود:
"حواستان باشد، موقع سوارکاری، زین اسب را عوض نمیکنند! "
💢حمید داودآبادی
@antioligarc…
البته به عمو گرفتن چیز جدیدی نبوده. یه زمانی مجاهدین هم به صدام میگفتن عمو صدام. وقتی اصول حرفه ای نداشته باشی و خط قرمز نفهمی چی هست به هر گند و گوهی کشیده میشی. به ترامپ میگی عمو، به صدام میگی عمو، حتی به یزید هم میگی عمو. چرا میگی عمو چون انقدر درگیر احساسات شدی که مبارزه با جمهوری اسلامی برات مقدس میشه و هر وسیله ای که در این جهت باشه برات مجاز میشه. یعنی فردا ممکنه طرفدار زدن بمب اتم هم بشی چون باهاش ممکنه جمهور…
👍44👎5🤮4❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @antioligarchie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
پس از ۷ ماه از فاجعه دیماه ۱۴۰۴ بنظر شما کدام روایت درباره تعداد کشته ها صحیح است؟
عدد رسمی دولت (3200 نفر)76%
عدد ادعایی رسانه های اپوزیسیون (۴۰هزار نفر)24%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
روشنفکران @Roshanfkrane · 57,138 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
دلنوشته ها - رحیم قمیشی @ghomeishi3 · 33,823 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026
ایران آزاد و آباد (مهدی نصیری) @iranazadvaabad · 32,666 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
دولت بهار @dolatebahar · 65,928 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026
علوم اجتماعی،مسائل روز @social_science · 23,976 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 September 2026
دانشگاه صوتی چکیده ماندگار | خلاصه کتاب تاریخی، سیاسی @EsfandiarKhodaee · 23,193 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 19 September 2026
خاطرات و خطرات @khateraaat · 22,210 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 September 2026
راديــو صُـــلح🎙🌿 @peaceradio1 · 22,929 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
مملکته داریم...؟! @mmlekatee · 41,647 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 29 August 2026
تحلیل و رصد @tahlilvarasad · 71,487 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 20 August 2026
ویرایش ذهن | شهابالدین حائری شیرازی @virayeshe_zehn · 31,149 Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آنتی الیگارشی” (@antioligarchie), 6,422 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/antioligarchie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.