Channel
@aphelios_hnd
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
25subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003708355659 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aphelios_hnd |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 7 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aphelios_hnd |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 07:19 | 25 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:14 | 27 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 01:28 | 28 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:02 | 26 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 26 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
15 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🌚 | 8 | 53.3% | |
| 💋 | 7 | 46.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌑 гравитум. они не хотят погибать и бегут со всех ног. но никто из них не спросил, хотим ли мы жить под сенью губительного солнца и сражаться за право жить и нести правду, поэтому их ноги вязнут в земле под тяжестью собственных грехов. гравитум — для ночей, когда цель отказывается сдаться. ❌✨✨✨ он кажется неповоротливым и медленным, но каждый выстрел имеет свой вес. крохотная чёрная дыра покорно тянет вниз и руку…
🌕 северум. мы не можем позволить себе отступать во время боя, чтобы позаботиться о ранах. наша борьба непрерывна. северум — для изматывающих долгих ночей, в которые ни за что нельзя умирать. ❌✨✨✨ он знает, где нужно надавить, чтобы пустить кровь. подпустить цель ближе, позволив ей увидеть свои собственные раны под лунным светом, а затем взмахнуть алым лезвием косы, находя поддержку и исцеление в чужой боли. горечь…
🌚1
🤩 благословение Луны. Алуна рассказала, что сегодня к ней заглядывала Юми. теперь сестра будет не так одинока. хорошо.
🌚1
🌑 калибрум. доступ к цели может быть сложным, но те, кто хотят противиться нашей свободе, могут таиться везде. калибрум — на случай, если цель так далека, что её можно не заметить. ❌✨✨✨ он видит врага раньше, чем мои глаза, и становится естественным продолжением вытянутой руки. нацелиться взглядом и нажать на курок — этого достаточно для того, чтобы лунный выстрел обнаружил цель даже под ослепительным солнцем в по…
🌚2💋1
я слышу ваше согласие. значит, по одному оружию за раз, чтобы искупать каждое из них в свете Луны полностью, не утаив ни единой детали.
было бы интересно узнать об оружии?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
✨ для каждой фазы своё оружие. каждое оружие для меня создаёт Алуна. они — творение её рук и запечатывание воли Луны в физической форме. мне не нужно ничего говорить для того, чтобы она знала, что нужно мне сейчас. каждое оружие — новая фаза Луны и отдельное состояние духа и тела. полагаю, я мог бы доверить вам эти истории. хотите услышать?
🖤🖤 дом там, где твои раны 🖤🖤 залечивают даже слова.
💋2
сделал исключение в графике ради такого события. если остались вопросы, сегодня можно задать их и под безжалостным светом солнца.
Любите задушевные разговоры на праздниках, которые помогают стать ближе? Мы точно любим! ❤️ Hopes&Dreams – проект, заботящийся об анонимности своих саппортов. Это позволяет вам, как читателям, получить полностью аутентичный опыт от взаимодействия с персонажем. Но мы понимаем, что всем иногда хочется заглянуть за маски и узнать чуть ближе человека, разделяющего с вами любовь к персонажу. Раз у нас особенное событие …
прошлой ночью пришлось отслеживать лагерь солари на восточном склоне. они были спокойны. спали глубоко и безмятежно. я стоял над ними тихо и старался скрыть дыхание. Алуна говорит, что у нас нет врагов. только те, кому суждено пересечься с нами под покровом ночи. но когда я думаю о том, что наша боль для них ничего не значит, и они не мучаются угрызениями совести под светом Луны, мне сложно помнить её слова. 🤩🤩🤩🤩…
Алуна сказала, что движение планет на небе Рунтерры сменилось. в вашем мире она назвала это Ретроградным Меркурием, пришедшим вчера. помните: как бы то ни было, ни одно небесное тело не властно над вашей судьбой. кроме Луны.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @aphelios_hnd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
было бы интересно узнать об оружии?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@aphelios_hnd named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“отдых до 20.09 // лунный свет. // h&d” (@aphelios_hnd), 25 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aphelios_hnd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.