Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝙳𝚎𝚝𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝙰𝚜𝚑𝚟𝚎𝚒𝚕 ❅ 𝙷&𝙳

Channel

𝙳𝚎𝚝𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝙰𝚜𝚑𝚟𝚎𝚒𝚕 ❅ 𝙷&𝙳

@ashveil_HnD

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

32subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003571416483
TypeChannel
Username@ashveil_HnD
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ashveil_HnD

Growth

283330.59 August 2026 — 28 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28 subscribers18 August 2026 — 31 subscribers26 August 2026 — 33 subscribers11 September 2026 — 32 subscribers329 August 202611 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 33 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27–34 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 12:2032-1
26 Aug 2026, 07:5333+2
18 Aug 2026, 15:4431+3
11 Aug 2026, 06:4628no change
9 Aug 2026, 17:4628first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

31 reactions across 15 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 96.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3096.8%
🤝13.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC8 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Я серьёзно. Если кто-то видел, пожалуйста, скажите, где видели. Я её слишком надёжно спрятал от себя...

👍1🤝1

10 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC8 viewsread 11 August 2026

Что вы тщательно скрываете от окружающих, даже от самого себя? Заначку...

3 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC15 viewsread 11 August 2026

Взрослеть — это учиться принимать ответственность за людей, которые тебе дороги.

3 Aug 2026, 08:36 UTC77 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

А я вам кое-что принёс.

👍1

29 Jul 2026, 21:24 UTC48 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Напоминаю, что я чутко прислушиваюсь к вашим отзывам, а мой стол заказов с теплом принимает ваши идеи о делах, которые следовало бы осветить. Ещё я иногда могу вас там угостить бананами. Ну, вдруг захочется.

👍2

29 Jul 2026, 21:18 UTC90 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Давайте просто загибать пальцы: 🟣Расследование было негигиеничным. Место обнаружения быстро оказалось заводнено людьми, и многие улики могли быть попросту уничтожены. Кроме того, технологии тогда были значительно хуже, и с биологическими следами тогда толком работать не умели. 🟣Место обнаружения тела не было местом совершения преступления. А место совершения преступления так и не нашли. 🟣Существенная часть времени бы

👍3

29 Jul 2026, 21:18 UTC56 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

По итогу громкое освещение дела принесло больше вреда, чем пользы. Мало того, что образ и биографию Шорт страшно переиначили, так ещё и полицию заваливали множеством сообщений с ложными обвинениями и заявлений от самозванцев. Семья Шорт лишилась всяческой приватности, а расследование превратилось в публичное достояние — это было убийственно, учитывая, что преступник ещё оставался на свободе. Если вы, как и я, преиспо

👍2

29 Jul 2026, 21:18 UTC43 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Обнаруженное тело было полностью обнажено и тщательно очищено. Оно подвергалось многочисленным повреждениям до и после смерти. Разделение тела проходило через межпозвоночную область уже посмертно. В качестве непосредственных причин смерти указываются кровоизлияние в мозг вследствие многочисленных ударов по голове и лицу, болевой шок и кровопотеря. На теле имелись следы связывания, а также повреждения в области запяст

👍2

29 Jul 2026, 21:17 UTC35 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Одним из известных мифов об Элизабет была её актёрская карьера. Однако, она никогда не заключала контрактов с киностудиями, участвовала в съёмках, принимала участия в кинопробах или проходила актёрское обучение. Бесспорно, Элизабет была очень хороша собой, но Голливуд она покорять не пыталась, даже несмотря на то, что жила буквально рядом с ним. Шорт интересовалась миром кино, общалась с людьми из него, но не имела к

👍2

29 Jul 2026, 21:17 UTC76 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 TW: упоминание смерти, упоминание жестокого (нет, правда, крайне жестокого) характера преступления, описание тела, тревожные описания, материал, способный вызвать тревогу. ❗️Дальнейший материал посвящён делу о смерти. В комментариях прикреплены и помещены под спойлер фотографии тела. Вы предупреждены. #нераскрытое@ashveil_HnD #загадочная_смерть@ashveil_HnD Во-первых, хочу отвесить реверанс нашей зде

👍2

26 Jul 2026, 13:37 UTC28 viewsread 11 August 2026

Начал работу над преступлением, пообщаться о котором меня попросил кое-кто из вас. Уже есть идеи, каким, детективы?

13 Jul 2026, 12:10 UTC87 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Не бойтесь выражать свои чувства, детективы.

👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ashveil_HnD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝙳𝚎𝚝𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝙰𝚜𝚑𝚟𝚎𝚒𝚕 ❅ 𝙷&𝙳” (@ashveil_HnD), 32 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ashveil_HnD.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.