Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Aqeelah

Channel

Aqeelah

@aqeelahwrites

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,724subscribers

+121 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001890952586
TypeChannel
Username@aqeelahwrites
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/aqeelahwrites

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,6001,7251,662.56 August 2026 — 1,603 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,605 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,600 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,607 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,614 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,617 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,623 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,617 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,627 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,632 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,636 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,676 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,725 subscribers17 September 2026 — 1,724 subscribers1,7246 August 202617 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net +121. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,581–1,744 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 01:181,724-1
13 Sept 2026, 04:001,725+49
9 Sept 2026, 07:421,676+40
3 Sept 2026, 15:371,636+4
31 Aug 2026, 19:041,632+5
28 Aug 2026, 14:441,627+10
25 Aug 2026, 05:481,617-6
22 Aug 2026, 04:271,623+6
19 Aug 2026, 06:351,617+3
15 Aug 2026, 20:541,614+7
12 Aug 2026, 13:051,607+7
9 Aug 2026, 21:311,600-5
6 Aug 2026, 21:001,605+2
6 Aug 2026, 14:051,603first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

802 reactions across 21 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥43954.7%
18222.7%
🕊10813.5%
👍485.99%
🤩192.37%
😢60.748%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 802 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 21 we hold a reading for · 43%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @aqeelahwrites. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 05:01 UTC296 views45 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Good day begins with : "What does Allah want me to do today?" Good character begins with "How would the Prophet sollallohu alayhi wasallam act in this situation?" Good family begins with: "How can I serve my family for Allah's sake today?" Good life begins with: "What will matter when I stand before Allah?" Aqeelahwrites

🕊29🔥114👍1

6 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC435 views46 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Everything outside of Islam is unhappiness. Everything within Islam is happiness. #lessonslearned

🔥33👍83🕊2

5 Aug 2026, 05:14 UTC438 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#remindertomyself Nothing you study in life is more intricate, more brilliant, more rigorous, more valuable, more intellectually-stimulating, more intellectually-challenging, more intellectually-invigorating than the Qur'an. The more you study the book, the more you learn to contemplate. The more you contemplate it, the more convinced you become that it is the book of God. If you still can't understand it

🔥216🕊6🤩1

4 Aug 2026, 05:13 UTC519 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

School should be a kind of place: #learning - where children love going; - where they learn from intellectually-challenging teachers; - where kids can have one-on-one tutoring tailored to their individual needs; - where kids are challenged at the level where they learn quickly but struggle just the right amount; - that teaches life skills beyond just facts, say like public speaking, financial literacy, and criti

🔥164

3 Aug 2026, 05:38 UTC719 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Today, a cool person is someone who is - disgustingly well-read, - frighteningly articulate, - mentally juicy, - relentlessly curious, - wildly alive to ideas, - deeply connected to their roots, - highly aware of their "why." The old idea of cool is slowly fading. Being rich, privileged, impeccably dressed with the latest gadgets in hand no longer makes a person interesting. People who stand out have depth - they

🔥29🕊74

2 Aug 2026, 04:43 UTC851 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#favoriteayaat Allah taught His Prophet sollallohu alayhi wasallam, and through him, all of us, to ask for an increase in only one thing: knowledge. Not a longer life. Not more wealth. Not more children. Not more provision. Not more followers. Not more comfort. Instead, He said: "My Lord, increase me in knowledge." (TAHA 114) That alone should reshape the way we make du'a. Because knowledge is what teaches us ho

24🔥7🕊7👍2🤩1

1 Aug 2026, 04:42 UTC809 views40 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

So much of what happens in your 20s shapes the trajectory of your life In your 20s, you step into higher education. If you study only to get into university, your knowledge serves only that goal. But if you pursue knowledge with a higher purpose that extends beyond the university admission, it will continue to benefit you long after you graduate. In your 20s, you feel the urge to become financially independent. If

🔥258🕊7

31 Jul 2026, 05:31 UTC≈1,630 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Deliberate practice beats daily practice In #languagelearning, consistency alone isn't enough. If you speak every day while repeating the same grammar mistakes, mispronouncing the same sounds, and choosing the wrong words, you're not getting better at English - you’re getting better at speaking it incorrectly. That's why deliberate practice matters. Instead of trying to improve everything at once, you isolate one

🔥25👍73🕊1

30 Jul 2026, 05:02 UTC715 views34 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Teacher or Influencer? Many English teachers today wear two hats - they teach in the classroom while building an online presence on the side, reaching learners both in person and from afar. As rewarding as that can be, balancing the two isn't easy. In fact, I don't think this is a matter of balance at all. Because becoming a better teacher is the foundation of becoming a worthwhile influencer. First, you should i

23🔥9👍2

29 Jul 2026, 05:32 UTC747 views53 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

It's Ibn Sina, not Avicenna. It's Amir Temur, not Tamerlane. It's Ibn Rushd, not Averroes. It's al-Khwarizmi, not Algoritmi. They latinized or westernized the names of some of the most prolific Muslim scholars. To the point that those versions have now come to overshadow their original identities. I can imagine that would sound wrong and icky to those same people if they were alive today. Please, just cut it out.

37👍10🔥3🤩3

28 Jul 2026, 03:28 UTC802 views37 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

What Is Happiness… (As described by those who have memorized the Qur'an) Happiness is having your own memories and stories attached to every surah. Happiness is feeling nervous every time you're about to recite your memorization to your teacher. Happiness is finding yourself revising the Qur'an even in your dreams. Happiness is going through countless hardships on this journey, yet still being able to say, "If I had

🔥21👍7🕊4😢3🤩2

27 Jul 2026, 05:45 UTC784 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

The CIA released a "Reading Improvement course" that had been hidden from the public since 1955. Here's arguably the most effective reading strategy from it, applicable both for reading independently and preparing for an exam. Scan: Quickly scan the introductory paragraph, subtitles, key sentences, key words, summary. Decide on the author's plan. Question: Turn the title or key sentences into questions. Anticipate:

🔥184👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @aqeelahwrites. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

IELTS CDI Report
@cdireport · 43,019
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 29 August 2026
Dilshodbek Ravshanov (9.0)
@ieltsaidbydilshodbek · 24,165
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 September 2026
Ozodbek's IELTS
@ozodbek_sk · 43,607
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 August 2026
" The Hindu Vocabulary" ™
@The_Hindu_English_Grammer · 92,961
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 16 August 2026
Siroj notes | 8.5
@Siroj_Notes · 44,074
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 1 September 2026
Jo’rabek Sanokulov | IELTS
@ieltswithsanokulov · 55,964
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
English Podcasts
@EnglishPodcastsOfficial · 27,544
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 September 2026
Jasurbek's blog|| BackUp
@jasurbekisaev · 1,227
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 7 September 2026
IELTS 9.0 √Suhrobjon Abdivaliev
@writing_t · 34,716
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Aqeelah” (@aqeelahwrites), 1,724 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aqeelahwrites.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.