Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
24 measurements spanning 92 days, net -85. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,936–6,051 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 21:26
5,953
+2
3 Nov 2026, 00:16
5,951
+2
30 Oct 2026, 21:57
5,949
-1
24 Oct 2026, 22:06
5,950
-6
21 Oct 2026, 14:06
5,956
+1
18 Oct 2026, 13:04
5,955
-10
15 Oct 2026, 03:48
5,965
+9
11 Oct 2026, 22:38
5,956
-1
4 Oct 2026, 23:37
5,957
-6
26 Sept 2026, 06:21
5,963
-8
17 Sept 2026, 12:36
5,971
-13
13 Sept 2026, 01:01
5,984
-8
8 Sept 2026, 16:40
5,992
-3
3 Sept 2026, 10:08
5,995
-12
30 Aug 2026, 22:04
6,007
+1
27 Aug 2026, 22:58
6,006
-1
25 Aug 2026, 04:14
6,007
-6
22 Aug 2026, 05:34
6,013
+4
18 Aug 2026, 23:44
6,009
-3
15 Aug 2026, 16:52
6,012
first reading
Engagement
48 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.65%
avg views ÷ 5,953 subscribers
Avg views / post
575
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 48 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
48 (24 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
12,070
Reactions total
217
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 01:08 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 04s
Average length
1m 02s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
531 reactions across 44 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
130
24.5%
❤
115
21.7%
👍
115
21.7%
⚡
63
11.9%
💯
52
9.79%
👌
16
3.01%
😎
11
2.07%
✍
7
1.32%
🙏
4
0.753%
🫡
4
0.753%
👏
3
0.565%
😈
3
0.565%
🤯
3
0.565%
🤔
2
0.377%
🤩
2
0.377%
💔
1
0.188%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 562 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (28.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
NOW IN ARKTOS JOURNAL
An Intolerable Double Standard
"Daniel Conversano contrasts the state’s leniency toward the violence that has followed France’s autumn high school protests with its swift ban of Polémia’s conference on remigration."
https://www.arktosjournal.com/p/an-intolerable-double-standard
NOW IN ARKTOS JOURNAL
Christian Chensvold – May the Dark Side of the Force Be With You
Gothic Olympus author Christian Chensvold writes about a current internet trend, and its metapolitical implications.
https://www.arktosjournal.com/p/may-the-dark-side-of-the-force-be
OUT NOW!
Daniel S. Forrest – Europe and the Regeneration of History
GET IT HERE!
"We stand at a turning point as momentous as the emergence of Homo sapiens or the rise of civilisation after the Neolithic Revolution. Yet this turning point confronts us with a dangerous paradox: the global triumph of modern Western civilisation, with all its inventions, may ultimately bring about the undoing of the European spirit a…
Our ever-expanding series Foundations (Institut Iliade) brings concise works by the Institut Iliade's foremost thinkers to English readers.
Explore the intellectual axis of the French, arguably the European, Right through accessible, affordable books HERE!
Julius Evola - Fascism Viewed from the Right
Audio version of this critical masterpiece, written by a man who was there. This, good people, is Fair And Balanced.
https://www.audible.com/pd/Fascism-Viewed-from-the-Right-Audiobook/B0HNXDJ1RP
Familiarize yourself with our latest translations of the work of Alain de Benoist, the Grand Old Man of the French New Right!
Animals and Men: The place of Man in Nature
Ideas in the Right Place: Foundations and Perspectives of the New Right
Nietzsche: Morality and Great Politics
Ladies and gentlemen, conveniently located just a click away is an excerpt from my book Thinking in Travels, forthcoming later this year from PRAV Publishing and Arktos.
NEW AUDIOBOOK NOW Dominique Venner – Samurai of the West: A Handbook for Dissidents
"Venner summons todays Europeans to reignite their spirit by returning to our civilizations foundational sources."
AVAILABLE ON AUDIBLE
OUT NOW!
Giorgio Locchi – Wagner, Nietzsche and the Suprahumanist Myth
Locchi traces the origins of the Suprahumanist Myth, examines the intellectual kinship between Wagner and Nietzsche, and sets out an open theory of history.
Today, Europe faces a choice between the triumph of egalitarianism and the ‘end of history,’ or regeneration through the affirmation of Suprahumanism that resounded in the Wagnerian epic.
…
NOW IN ARKTOS JOURNAL
The Legacy of Francis Parker Yockey: An Interview with Kerry Bolton
In an exclusive interview with Arktos Journal, New Zealand historian Dr. Kerry Bolton discusses the life and ideas of Francis Parker Yockey, the American lawyer and author of Imperium.
https://www.arktosjournal.com/p/the-importance-of-francis-parker
NOW IN ARKTOS JOURNAL
J.R. Sommer – Salvific Human Error and AI's Inhuman Perfection
"When man is all but forgotten and with nothing really human left to remember him, we will look fondly back at our era of error: Remember what it was to be human? Remember what it was to be divine?"
https://www.arktosjournal.com/p/salvific-human-error-and-ais-inhuman
👍5❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @arktosmedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Alexander Dugin @Dugin_Aleksandr · 22,319 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 20 September 2026
Thuletide @thuletide · 22,788 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 20 September 2026
Blair Cottrell 🇦🇺 @realblaircottrell · 19,593 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 30 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Arktos” (@arktosmedia), 5,953 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arktosmedia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.