Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Canal Strategika

Channel

Canal Strategika

@strategika

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,833subscribers

-142 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001455174066
TypeChannel
Username@strategika
Created15 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/strategika

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,8339,9759,9046 August 2026 — 9,975 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,975 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,973 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,970 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,954 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,942 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,928 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,914 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,901 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,889 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,878 subscribers5 September 2026 — 9,867 subscribers10 September 2026 — 9,848 subscribers14 September 2026 — 9,842 subscribers18 September 2026 — 9,833 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 43 days, net -142. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,812–9,996 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 11:019,833-9
14 Sept 2026, 11:569,842-6
10 Sept 2026, 14:179,848-19
5 Sept 2026, 12:369,867-11
1 Sept 2026, 04:139,878-11
29 Aug 2026, 05:539,889-12
26 Aug 2026, 00:379,901-13
22 Aug 2026, 16:189,914-14
19 Aug 2026, 05:139,928-14
16 Aug 2026, 06:349,942-12
12 Aug 2026, 17:139,954-16
9 Aug 2026, 19:319,970-3
7 Aug 2026, 00:339,973-2
6 Aug 2026, 10:169,975no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:539,975first reading

Engagement

117 posts held, back to 7 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.36%
avg views ÷ 9,833 subscribers
Avg views / post
724
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.724%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 117 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held117 (7 June 202628 August 2026)
Views total12,300
Reactions total89
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 04:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 25s
Average length
2m 08s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

600 reactions across 117 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍32253.7%
8714.5%
🙏447.33%
🔥366.00%
💯315.17%
💩162.67%
👏111.83%
🤔111.83%
🤡101.67%
👌71.17%
👎50.833%
💊40.667%
😱40.667%
🏆30.5%
🖕20.333%
🙈20.333%
🤮20.333%
😡10.167%
🤩10.167%
🤬10.167%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 117 of the 117 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 600 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 117 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC451 views5 reactionsread 29 August 2026

LA SÉPARATION DES POUVOIRS : GÉNÉALOGIE D'UNE IMPOSTURE - Valerie Bugault - Strategika https://share.google/BHqa6QmU4J3rWowJv

👍5

27 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTC642 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026

LA SÉPARATION DES POUVOIRS : GÉNÉALOGIE D'UNE IMPOSTURE - Valerie Bugault - Strategika https://share.google/4ZTUphdacsu93kIy9

👍2

27 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC629 views8 reactionsread 29 August 2026

https://strategika.fr/2026/08/16/des-cardinaux-ignares-qui-font-honte-a-leglise/

💩6👍2

27 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC642 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Le grand projet d'Ankara - Strategika https://share.google/HSKlanFOPvYQY0Lm6

👍3

27 Aug 2026, 08:23 UTC687 views13 reactionsread 29 August 2026

L’oligarchie financière anglo-saxonne et le complexe militaro-industriel américain - Strategika https://share.google/2qvgUWdvaV4axIP6m

👍83💩1🤔1

26 Aug 2026, 10:22 UTC749 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Douguine, Mamleev, le dard métaphysique et la prison atlantique - Strategika https://share.google/gIVNDxTtNtQci6npo

👍2

26 Aug 2026, 10:09 UTC707 views3 reactionsread 29 August 2026

BRICS, OCS et la guerre contre l’Iran de les Etats-Unis - Strategika https://share.google/ut7K7v9nGjAq3Ff7g

👍2🤡1

25 Aug 2026, 18:15 UTC764 views5 reactionsread 29 August 2026

La civilisation de la luxure - Strategika https://share.google/5FFkVIOykikHJBF1V

👍4💯1

25 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC736 views4 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Le conflit permanent contre l’Europe - Strategika https://share.google/siJ90nlx50xUlWtvv

👍2🤡1😡1

25 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC713 views4 reactionsread 29 August 2026

https://strategika.fr/2026/08/11/even-if-the-strait-of-hormuz-opens-the-damage-to-the-persian-gulf-energy-infrastructure-is-enormous/

2👍2

25 Aug 2026, 08:22 UTC738 views4 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Le pacte de La Mecque et la recomposition de l’Eurasie occidentale - Strategika https://share.google/WexFzgA5M5jIwSv8S

👍4

25 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC711 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Germany’s Road to War Against Russia - Strategika https://share.google/t5HzTR74j2VFcKEb3

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 117 posts we hold for @strategika. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ernst Wolff
@WolffErnsts_offiziells · 319,420
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 11 September 2026
REINFO Officiel
@reinfocovid_officiel · 25,755
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 September 2026
▼ Le Grand Réveil / Liberta Press
@LeGrandReveil · 63,044
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
RGNR - Nous c’est la Vie !
@rgnr_fr · 39,511
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 September 2026
Valérie Bugault officiel ⚖️
@valeriebugault · 22,723
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Canal Strategika” (@strategika), 9,833 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/strategika.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.