Channel
@rgnr_fr
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
39,511subscribers
-420 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001204402857 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rgnr_fr |
| Description | Suivez les dernières actualités de l'équipe RGNR ! Retrouvez tous nos liens -> https://liens.rgnr.tv |
| Created | 15 April 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rgnr_fr |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 14:22 | 39,511 | -29 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 02:21 | 39,540 | -20 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:57 | 39,560 | -12 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 13:37 | 39,572 | -11 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 39,583 | -18 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 00:36 | 39,601 | -39 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 13:42 | 39,640 | -11 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 15:17 | 39,651 | -12 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:05 | 39,663 | -10 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:56 | 39,673 | -9 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:06 | 39,682 | -10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 39,692 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 39,699 | -4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:41 | 39,703 | -8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:06 | 39,711 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 39,717 | -9 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 39,726 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 39,731 | -31 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 39,762 | -17 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 39,779 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 26 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 86 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1,856 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 851 | 45.9% | |
| ❤ | 819 | 44.1% | |
| 🙏 | 130 | 7.00% | |
| 👏 | 19 | 1.02% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 0.808% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 0.377% | |
| 😱 | 7 | 0.377% | |
| 👎 | 6 | 0.323% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.054% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.054% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,856 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 19 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🦋 La thyroïde est-elle vraiment malade, ou traduit-elle simplement l'état de votre corps ? La thyroïde tombe rarement malade d'elle-même — elle reflète l'état du corps. Thierry ouvre la cartographie : anatomie, hormones T4/T3, iode, régulation. Un regard qui change tout. 👇 Lire la suite
❤64👍40🙏12👏1😁1
🦋 La thyroïde est-elle vraiment malade, ou traduit-elle simplement l'état de votre corps ? Troisième épisode de la série Hormones. Thierry ouvre la cartographie de la thyroïde, avec une thèse qui change le regard : elle tombe rarement malade d'elle-même, elle reflète ce qui se passe dans le reste du corps. Dans ce premier volet : • l'anatomie et le vrai rôle de la thyroïde • les hormones T4 et T3, et pourquoi la co…
❤110👍55🙏24
🥦 Les fruits font-ils grossir ? L'arnaque intellectuelle du siècle. Depuis que le fructose industriel a été identifié comme facteur majeur de stéatose hépatique et d'obésité, une confusion savamment entretenue s'est installée : le fructose du fruit serait aussi dangereux que celui du Coca-Cola. C'est une absurdité physiologique. Une pomme contient environ 13 grammes de fructose. Un soda de 50 cl en contient 33, sou…
👍97❤68👏12🙏8👎2
🥦 Les fruits font-ils grossir ? L'arnaque intellectuelle du siècle. Le fructose du fruit serait aussi dangereux que celui du Coca-Cola ? C'est une confusion savamment entretenue — et une absurdité physiologique. Les études le confirment, les chiffres aussi. 👇 Lire la suite
👍70❤15🙏12😁6👎3🔥2
⚡ Vous brûlez plus de calories en bougeant sans y penser qu'en allant à la salle de sport En 1999, James Levine (Mayo Clinic) publie dans Science une étude qui devrait rendre modeste tout coach sportif. Il suralimente des sujets sains de 1 000 calories par jour pendant huit semaines. Certains prennent beaucoup de poids, d'autres presque rien. La variable qui explique cette différence n'est ni la génétique, ni le mét…
👍64❤48🙏11👎1
⚡ Vous brûlez plus de calories en bougeant sans y penser qu'en allant à la salle de sport Une étude publiée dans Science en 1999 a montré que jusqu'à 700 calories par jour peuvent être brûlées sans aucun sport. La variable clé n'est ni la génétique, ni le métabolisme — c'est le mouvement du quotidien. 👇 Lire la suite
👍45❤17
🧠 Ce parcours illustre un mécanisme endocrinien classique Ce parcours illustre un mécanisme endocrinien classique et bien documenté. Une résistance à l'insuline installée depuis la puberté signifie que les récepteurs cellulaires répondent de moins en moins à l'insuline, ce qui oblige le pancréas à en produire davantage pour maintenir une glycémie normale — c'est l'hyperinsulinémie compensatoire. Or l'insuline est l'…
❤51👍28🙏10
🧠 Ce parcours illustre un mécanisme endocrinien classique Prendre du poids malgré des efforts constants, ce n'est pas un manque de volonté. C'est souvent un verrou hormonal bien précis — et comprendre ce mécanisme change tout. 👇 Lire la suite
👍33❤11👏3🙏3
⚡ Vos nuits courtes vous font grossir plus que vos assiettes On vous parle de calories, de régimes, de volonté. Personne ne vous parle de vos nuits alors que les données sont sans appel. En 1999, Spiegel et Van Cauter (Université de Chicago) publient dans le Lancet une étude qui devrait figurer dans tous les cabinets de diététique. Ils restreignent le sommeil de jeunes hommes en bonne santé à quatre heures par nuit…
❤43👍30🙏6👏3
⚡ Vos nuits courtes vous font grossir plus que vos assiettes Vos nuits courtes modifient vos hormones de la faim avant même que vous n'ouvriez un frigo. Une étude publiée dans le Lancet l'a mesuré en une semaine. Et les chiffres changent tout. 👇 Lire la suite
👍29❤9🙏7🔥2
⚡ Plus vous grossissez, plus vous avez faim. Plus vous grossissez, plus vous avez faim. Ce paradoxe n'est pas un manque de volonté — c'est une biologie qui s'emballe. Voici pourquoi. 👇 Lire la suite
👍41❤16🙏6🔥2
⚡ Plus vous grossissez, plus vous avez faim. C'est un paradoxe qui défie le bon sens, et pourtant c'est exactement ce qui se passe quand la résistance à la leptine s'installe. La leptine est une hormone produite par vos adipocytes (cellules graisseuses) en proportion directe de votre masse grasse. Plus vous avez de graisse, plus vous produisez de leptine, et plus le signal envoyé à l'hypothalamus devrait être clair…
❤56👍23🙏11🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @rgnr_fr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RGNR - Nous c’est la Vie !” (@rgnr_fr), 39,511 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rgnr_fr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.