Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
50 measurements spanning 82 days, net -457. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,399–27,066 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 50
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Oct 2026, 16:27
26,532
-2
26 Oct 2026, 15:28
26,534
-2
25 Oct 2026, 14:11
26,536
+14
24 Oct 2026, 11:20
26,522
-4
23 Oct 2026, 08:40
26,526
-4
20 Oct 2026, 23:38
26,530
+18
19 Oct 2026, 20:56
26,512
+10
18 Oct 2026, 21:16
26,502
+10
17 Oct 2026, 22:21
26,492
+16
16 Oct 2026, 21:16
26,476
-8
15 Oct 2026, 19:25
26,484
-9
14 Oct 2026, 20:01
26,493
+16
13 Oct 2026, 12:46
26,477
-26
9 Oct 2026, 13:56
26,503
-2
5 Oct 2026, 07:20
26,505
-42
28 Sept 2026, 23:02
26,547
-80
18 Sept 2026, 01:19
26,627
-24
15 Sept 2026, 19:36
26,651
-25
14 Sept 2026, 02:15
26,676
-18
12 Sept 2026, 07:18
26,694
first reading
Engagement
460 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 120 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.61%
avg views ÷ 26,532 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,280
288 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.984%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
288
of 460 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 277 of 288 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 October 2026
Posts held
460 (29 July 2026 – 26 October 2026)
Views total
658,016
Reactions total
6,259
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Oct 2026, 04:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5h 04m
Average length
3m 37s
Measured directly from 84 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
12,986 reactions across 448 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
3,601
27.7%
👍
2,738
21.1%
❤
1,668
12.8%
😱
1,496
11.5%
👎
1,446
11.1%
😁
890
6.85%
👌
370
2.85%
👏
232
1.79%
😢
149
1.15%
🏆
136
1.05%
😭
134
1.03%
🙏
62
0.477%
🎉
48
0.37%
🕊
16
0.123%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 448 of the 460 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,986 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 460 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 26 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
1,3 milliard d’euros investis dans la ligne Paris-Clermont, mais la SNCF supprime des trains faute de voitures Corail disponibles. Les rames neuves Oxygène ne sont attendues qu’à l’été 2027 : d’ici là, les voyageurs paient le prix d’un service ferroviaire à bout de souffle.
https://www.lecourrierdesstrateges.fr/1-3-milliard-deuros-dans-la-ligne-paris-clermont-et-des-trains-supprimes-faute-de-wagons/
À Pleurtuit, le camping devait fermer le 31 décembre : une décision administrative a avancé l’échéance au 12 octobre, laissant aux résidents permanents quelques jours pour partir. Au "nom de la sécurité", qui se préoccupe du sort de ceux qui n’ont parfois nulle part où aller ?
https://www.lecourrierdesstrateges.fr/pleurtuit-le-sous-prefet-avance-la-fermeture-du-camping-de-deux-mois-et-demi-et-jette-dehors-ceux-qui-y-…
Israël au seuil d’un basculement tectonique
Les élections du 27 octobre seront un plébiscite non seulement sur Netanyahou, mais sur l’essence même de l’État israélien.
Israël, un pays piégé dans l’« interrègne »
Le 27 octobre 2026, Israël se rendra pour la première fois depuis l’attaque du Hamas du 7 octobre 2023 à des élections générales. Formellement, les Israéliens éliront la 26e Knesset et détermineront qui fo…
Samedi, 70 000 policiers et gendarmes. Vendredi, trois heures à l'Élysée pour un mot : « refonte ». Les lycéens réclament 10 milliards introuvables. Fermer Parcoursup ne coûte pas un centime, et c'est la seule chose qu'on leur refuse.
https://www.lecourrierdesstrateges.fr/eh-manu-supprime-parcoursup-pour-retablir-lordre-vite/
C'est indispensable, il faut réaffirmer notre identité29%
Elle va cliver inutilement10%
Il faut imiter Trump et lancer une remigration massive28%
Fermer les frontières, ce serait déjà bien40%
L'immigration est un mal nécessaire pour payer nos retraites5%
Il faudrait plusieurs niveaux de citoyenneté selon l'ancienneté de l'installation en France11%
Un Français dont les grands-parents sont nés en Algérie n'est pas un vrai Français5%
Pas de problème : au bout de dix ans en France, on devient français10%
C'est tellement clivant, tout ça9%
Pas d'opinion12%
The shares total 159%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Je l'ai regardé attentivement et il m'a surpris par sa fraîcheur et son élan6%
Je l'ai regardé attentivement et j'ai détesté0%
Je l'ai suivi de loin, par médias interposés8%
Je ne l'ai pas suivi68%
Discours de campagne qui ne dit pas tout, c'est normal12%
Elle a proposé de raser gratis et il y aura des déçus10%
Discours sans impact selon moi8%
Pas d'avis7%
The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
« Une seule communauté, la communauté nationale », dit Marine Le Pen. Laquelle ? Celle de Renan, où l'on entre en apprenant, ou celle de Barrès, où l'on entre en naissant ? Le texte de la révision n'est pas publié.
https://www.lecourrierdesstrateges.fr/la-communaute-nationale-dans-la-constitution-mais-laquelle/
Deux référendums, Bardella Premier ministre, fin de la loi Hulot, baisses de TVA, et aucun chiffrage. Synthèse du discours de Marine Le Pen à Orléans, sans commentaire.
https://www.lecourrierdesstrateges.fr/marine-le-pen-a-orleans-ce-que-contient-le-discours-de-la-renaissance/
Votre « huissier » vous écrit : acte ou simple relance ? Sans titre exécutoire cité, aucune saisie n'est possible, et les frais de recouvrement amiable sont à la charge du créancier. Mode d'emploi.
https://www.lecourrierdesstrateges.fr/comment-dejouer-les-tricheries-des-huissiers-recouvreurs/
239 heures de cours envolées, 1 200 euros de dédommagement : l’État vient d’être condamné à Nantes, soit environ 5 euros l’heure.
https://www.lecourrierdesstrateges.fr/239-heures-de-cours-jamais-assurees-letat-condamne-a-indemniser-la-mere-dun-collegien/
42,97 € par jour. C'est le maximum que verse l'Assurance maladie en arrêt long, quel que soit votre salaire.
Aucun texte n'oblige votre employeur à couvrir le reste.
Les trois documents à réclamer, et les trois chiffres à y chercher.
https://www.lecourrierdesstrateges.fr/salaries-avez-vous-verifie-comment-votre-employeur-assure-vos-longues-maladies/
👍8😱7❤4🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 460 posts we hold for @resterlibre. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 23 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
C'est indispensable, il faut réaffirmer notre identité29%
Elle va cliver inutilement10%
Il faut imiter Trump et lancer une remigration massive28%
Fermer les frontières, ce serait déjà bien40%
L'immigration est un mal nécessaire pour payer nos retraites5%
Il faudrait plusieurs niveaux de citoyenneté selon l'ancienneté de l'installation en France11%
Un Français dont les grands-parents sont nés en Algérie n'est pas un vrai Français5%
Pas de problème : au bout de dix ans en France, on devient français10%
C'est tellement clivant, tout ça9%
Pas d'opinion12%
The shares total 159%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Je l'ai regardé attentivement et il m'a surpris par sa fraîcheur et son élan6%
Je l'ai regardé attentivement et j'ai détesté0%
Je l'ai suivi de loin, par médias interposés8%
Je ne l'ai pas suivi68%
Discours de campagne qui ne dit pas tout, c'est normal12%
Elle a proposé de raser gratis et il y aura des déçus10%
Discours sans impact selon moi8%
Pas d'avis7%
The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Le régime des assemblées en mode Jancovici ou Chouard, c'est :
Ce que je souhaite précisément8%
Une formule d'avenir pour nos démocraties19%
Y a de l'idée, mais des inconvénients aussi22%
Cela rappelle Robespierre et la Convention18%
Je n'aime pas tant que ça les référendums6%
Seuls les désoeuvrés auront le temps d'aller dans les Assemblées19%
Cela doit passer après la limitation des pouvoirs et l'amaigrissement de l'Etat40%
Une utopie qui ne peut pas fonctionner19%
Pas d'avis11%
The shares total 162%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
La stratégie "tout répression" du gouvernement va nous mener :
A une victoire salutaire des forces de police3%
Au triomphe du bon sens et de l'ordre, même si cela prend du temps5%
A un conflit long et coûteux29%
A des désordres évitables par la conciliation et le compromis25%
A un désespoir de la jeunesse22%
A une rupture durable que nous mettrons des années à surmonter35%
A une défaite du pouvoir en rase campagne17%
A une insurrection douloureuse33%
A une chute accélérée du régime29%
Aucune opinion7%
The shares total 205%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Je préfère un système avec un homme fort type Poutine19%
Elle s'effondrera naturellement car elle ne tient plus la promesse de prospérité partagée38%
Je préfère la garder mais la recentrer sur le "contrat social"2%
Je l'aime telle qu'elle l'est2%
Le monde change en profondeur et quelque chose de nouveau va apparaître43%
Cela m'intéresse de participer à une réflexion sur l'avenir21%
Le retour du Roi, c'est ce qu'il nous faut14%
Sans opinion4%
The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Le son est à améliorer, vraiment désagréable à écouter11%
Audible, mais peut mieux faire22%
Non, c'est correct comme ça21%
Cela me va très bien36%
Pas d'avis11%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 460 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 26 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
REINFO Officiel @reinfocovid_officiel · 25,437 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 September 2026
GÉOPOLITIQUE PROFONDE @GPTVoff · 19,088 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 4 October 2026
Les Patriotes 🇫🇷 @les_patriotes · 23,603 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 September 2026
Jean-Dominique Michel (Officiel) @jdmichel · 20,011 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 September 2026
Alexandra Henrion Caude️️️ ️️ @alexandrahenrioncaude · 38,984 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
🎙 ALEXIS POULIN 🎙 @alexis_poulin · 24,903 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
Bon Sens @vivrecorrectement · 21,110 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 September 2026
Savoir Libre @savoirlibre · 21,138 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 September 2026
Valérie Bugault officiel ⚖️ @valeriebugault · 23,470 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 September 2026
KOMPЯOMAT @kompromatmedia_2 · 30,835 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 6 September 2026
Momotchi @momotchiii · 34,920 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 2 September 2026
LLP LeLibrePenseur.org @Salim_Laibi_LLP · 39,721 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 August 2026
Christine Deviers-Joncour Officiel @xtinedeviersjoncour · 19,430 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 October 2026
Chloé F - canal info officiel @chloefinfosofficiel · 23,378 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 September 2026
La Vérité Diffusée @VeriteDiffusee · 73,480 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
▼ Le Grand Réveil / Liberta Press @LeGrandReveil · 62,144 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
Aubontouitefrancais @aubontouite_francais · 48,429 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 August 2026
Silvano Trotta Officiel @trottasilvano · 120,439 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
STRATPOL @stratpol · 70,849 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026
Michel Dogna Officiel @micheldognaofficiel · 21,966 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 21 September 2026
Black Bond PTV ⚔️🦅😇 @StoryOfBlackBond · 44,490 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 28 August 2026
Infos citoyennes @LaVeriteCensureeoff · 28,751 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 9 September 2026
Quoi2news 👀 @quoi2news · 31,121 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 5 September 2026
𝕷𝖊 𝕮𝖔𝖒𝖕𝖑𝖔𝖙 𝖉𝖚 𝕹𝖔𝖚𝖛𝖊𝖑 𝕺𝖗𝖉𝖗𝖊 𝕸𝖔𝖓𝖉𝖎𝖆𝖑 @complotdunouvelordremondial · 23,150 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 18 September 2026
This channel appears in 32 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rester libre !” (@resterlibre), 26,532 subscribers as measured 27 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/resterlibre.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.