Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Stanislas Berton

Channel

Stanislas Berton

@Stanislas_Berton

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,021subscribers

+23 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001429325753
TypeChannel
Username@Stanislas_Berton
Created1 June 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Stanislas_Berton

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,9739,0279,0006 August 2026 — 8,998 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,998 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,995 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,988 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,981 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,988 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,983 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,977 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,976 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,977 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,979 subscribers6 September 2026 — 8,983 subscribers11 September 2026 — 8,981 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8,973 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,979 subscribers28 September 2026 — 8,992 subscribers5 October 2026 — 8,995 subscribers12 October 2026 — 9,005 subscribers15 October 2026 — 9,013 subscribers18 October 2026 — 9,016 subscribers24 October 2026 — 9,021 subscribers27 October 2026 — 9,027 subscribers30 October 2026 — 9,016 subscribers2 November 2026 — 9,021 subscribers9,0216 August 20262 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 89 days, net +23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,965–9,035 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Nov 2026, 23:069,021+5
30 Oct 2026, 14:079,016-11
27 Oct 2026, 23:119,027+6
24 Oct 2026, 19:119,021+5
18 Oct 2026, 11:009,016+3
15 Oct 2026, 15:269,013+8
12 Oct 2026, 12:199,005+10
5 Oct 2026, 20:418,995+3
28 Sept 2026, 18:578,992+13
18 Sept 2026, 19:408,979+6
14 Sept 2026, 14:408,973-8
11 Sept 2026, 03:418,981-2
6 Sept 2026, 15:018,983+4
1 Sept 2026, 18:238,979+2
29 Aug 2026, 18:468,977+1
26 Aug 2026, 13:218,976-1
23 Aug 2026, 03:128,977-6
19 Aug 2026, 08:118,983-5
16 Aug 2026, 06:158,988+7
12 Aug 2026, 10:588,981first reading

Engagement

222 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.3%
avg views ÷ 9,021 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,200
54 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
54
of 222 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held222 (3 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total64,891
Reactions total1,811
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 22:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,250
Videos
≈837
Links
≈6,210

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
7m 47s
Average length
1m 57s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

9,523 reactions across 216 posts, in 44 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,32824.4%
🙏1,91020.1%
❤1,70717.9%
👏6817.15%
🤬5535.81%
💯4164.37%
😈3063.21%
🔥2242.35%
🤮1992.09%
👌1922.02%
🤔1691.77%
❤‍🔥971.02%
🤪790.83%
🍾720.756%
🤯710.746%
😁620.651%
🤣590.62%
🥴440.462%
👎380.399%
😭380.399%
24 further kinds2782.92%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 216 of the 222 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,523 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 222 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 54 posts held from the last 30 days (5.56%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 19:02 UTC613 views7 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Je suis en direct sur @KateTVinterview : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IolXrJ1OnFA

❤7

5 Nov 2026, 18:04 UTC714 views11 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Pour mes lecteurs francophones : vous trouverez ci-dessous un lien vers mon essai sur la fraude électorale. Il date de 2021 et sa version définitive se trouve dans le Volume II des Essais. https://stanislasberton.com/index.php/2019/10/12/de-la-fraude-electorale/

👍11

5 Nov 2026, 16:50 UTC770 views2 reactionsread 5 November 2026

I have put online my essay on election fraud. It was written in 2021 following the 2020 presidential election and was included in the 2nd volume of my Essays. It remains relevant today and is included in my anthology of Essays : "Fighting globalism" https://stanislasberton.substack.com/p/electoral-fraud

👏2

5 Nov 2026, 13:21 UTC899 views47 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @fdesoucheofficielPhoto

Scandale du périscolaire parisien: les plannings étaient truffés d’erreurs et la justice n’en a pas été informée, permettant aux accusés d’être mis hors de cause car supposément pas seuls avec les enfants les jours des faits « C’est grave. Extrêmement grave. » Marie Grimaud, l’avocate qui défend quatre familles de victimes de violences sexuelles dans le périscolaire, est atterrée. À côté d’elle, dans le public, des …

🤬24🔥15😭4❤3😱1

5 Nov 2026, 13:21 UTC887 views31 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Incompétence et laxisme ou tout simplement des pédocriminels qui protègent d'autres pédocriminels? Pourquoi est-ce si difficile d'admettre que des pédocriminels ont infiltré nos appareils d’État et se livrent à de la prédation systématique sur nos enfants?

💯28❤2👍1

5 Nov 2026, 12:04 UTC923 views15 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤12🔥3

5 Nov 2026, 12:04 UTC932 views25 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Et comme je l'ai expliqué, ce plan de libération ne concerne pas que l'Amérique mais le monde, via un axe patriote Amérique/Russie/Chine. Cette thèse peut tout à fait être contestée mais @LaurentOzon comment expliquez-vous par exemple cette reprise par Kiril Dmitriev, PDG du fonds souverain russe et envoyé spécial de V. Poutine de ce message de Q qui parle "d'une coordination russo-chinoise avec Trump pour détruire …

👏19👍4🥱2

5 Nov 2026, 11:03 UTC955 views13 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Point de vue compréhensible, sauf qu'il existe ici un ensemble de faits et de décisions qui peuvent venir raisonnablement soutenir cette thèse. https://x.com/LaurentOzon/status/2118266333263520036 J'en ai fait la liste ici : https://x.com/StanislasBerton/status/2117511795380285829 Pour ne prendre qu'un exemple: pourquoi Trump a t'il signé dès 2018 un décret présidentiel (EO 13848) visant à mettre en place une st…

👍6👎3❤2💯2

5 Nov 2026, 08:16 UTC≈1,020 views18 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @la_realgeopolitikPhoto

Ceci est le premier échelon de la "démocratie constante" ("whole-process people's democracy", que j'explique en détail dans mon ouvrage "Comprendre la relation Chine-Occident), et dont je parlais ici il y a quelques jours : https://x.com/LAURENTMICHEL0N/status/2115620942772916440?a=NS5EoB3mS3AFcZYLdYk&s=20 Le second échelon concerne les 101 millions de membres du PCC, qui, tels des grands électeurs, votent sur les …

👍16❤2

5 Nov 2026, 08:16 UTC≈1,050 views24 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Merci à Laurent Michelon de nous informer du processus démocratique qui existe bel et bien en Chine, y compris au niveau local et au sein du PCC. À bien des égards, la Chine "dictatoriale" est bien plus démocratique que nos fausses démocraties et le PCC défend bien plus et mieux les intérêts du peuple chinois que notre oligarchie mondialiste corrompue. Pour un point de vue différent et informé sur la Chine, je reco…

❤12👍6👌4🤔2

5 Nov 2026, 07:48 UTC≈1,040 views14 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Pour illustrer par l'exemple le problème des RINOS: le gouverneur républicain du Texas, Abbot, a fait venir légalement près de 500K indiens durant son mandat. https://x.com/TaylorRMarshall/status/2118007180506882343

🤬14

5 Nov 2026, 07:34 UTC≈1,050 views13 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @linwoodspeakstruthPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

❤10👍2🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 222 posts we hold for @Stanislas_Berton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Christine Deviers-Joncour Officiel
@xtinedeviersjoncour · 19,392
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 October 2026
Valérie Bugault officiel ⚖️
@valeriebugault · 23,440
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 September 2026
Jean-Dominique Michel (Officiel)
@jdmichel · 20,005
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 September 2026
Aubontouitefrancais
@aubontouite_francais · 48,449
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 August 2026
Chloé F - canal info officiel
@chloefinfosofficiel · 23,230
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 September 2026
LLP LeLibrePenseur.org
@Salim_Laibi_LLP · 39,588
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 August 2026
Momotchi
@momotchiii · 34,870
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 2 September 2026
Radio-Québec
@radio_quebec · 41,414
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 August 2026
Les Patriotes 🇫🇷
@les_patriotes · 23,552
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 17 September 2026
Silvano Trotta Officiel
@trottasilvano · 119,987
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
🎙 ALEXIS POULIN 🎙
@alexis_poulin · 24,848
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
La Nouvelle France 🇫🇷
@la_nouvelle_france · 24,942
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 September 2026
Rester libre !
@resterlibre · 26,470
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 September 2026
KOMPЯOMAT
@kompromatmedia_2 · 30,714
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 6 September 2026
Black Bond PTV ⚔️🦅😇
@StoryOfBlackBond · 44,353
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 28 August 2026
𝙊 𝘽 𝙎 𝙀 𝙍 𝙑 𝙀
@observelemonde · 19,410
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 30 September 2026
Infos citoyennes
@LaVeriteCensureeoff · 28,814
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 9 September 2026
Boris Karpov 🇷🇺 📣 Brèves de Russie
@boriskarpovrussie · 21,064
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 September 2026
Bon Sens
@vivrecorrectement · 21,065
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 September 2026
▼ Le Grand Réveil / Liberta Press
@LeGrandReveil · 61,949
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
La Vérité Diffusée
@VeriteDiffusee · 73,293
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
Alexandra Henrion Caude️️️ ️️
@alexandrahenrioncaude · 38,905
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
GÉOPOLITIQUE PROFONDE
@GPTVoff · 19,086
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 4 October 2026
REINFO Officiel
@reinfocovid_officiel · 25,358
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Stanislas Berton” (@Stanislas_Berton), 9,021 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Stanislas_Berton.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.