Je suis en direct sur @KateTVinterview : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IolXrJ1OnFA
❤7

Channel
@Stanislas_Berton
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,021subscribers
+23 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001429325753 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Stanislas_Berton |
| Created | 1 June 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Stanislas_Berton |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Nov 2026, 23:06 | 9,021 | +5 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 14:07 | 9,016 | -11 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 23:11 | 9,027 | +6 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 19:11 | 9,021 | +5 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 11:00 | 9,016 | +3 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 15:26 | 9,013 | +8 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 12:19 | 9,005 | +10 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 20:41 | 8,995 | +3 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 18:57 | 8,992 | +13 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:40 | 8,979 | +6 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 14:40 | 8,973 | -8 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 03:41 | 8,981 | -2 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 15:01 | 8,983 | +4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:23 | 8,979 | +2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 8,977 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 13:21 | 8,976 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:12 | 8,977 | -6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 08:11 | 8,983 | -5 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 8,988 | +7 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:58 | 8,981 | first reading |
222 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 222 (3 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 64,891 |
| Reactions total | 1,811 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 22:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
9,523 reactions across 216 posts, in 44 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2,328 | 24.4% | |
| 🙏 | 1,910 | 20.1% | |
| ❤ | 1,707 | 17.9% | |
| 👏 | 681 | 7.15% | |
| 🤬 | 553 | 5.81% | |
| 💯 | 416 | 4.37% | |
| 😈 | 306 | 3.21% | |
| 🔥 | 224 | 2.35% | |
| 🤮 | 199 | 2.09% | |
| 👌 | 192 | 2.02% | |
| 🤔 | 169 | 1.77% | |
| ❤🔥 | 97 | 1.02% | |
| 🤪 | 79 | 0.83% | |
| 🍾 | 72 | 0.756% | |
| 🤯 | 71 | 0.746% | |
| 😁 | 62 | 0.651% | |
| 🤣 | 59 | 0.62% | |
| 🥴 | 44 | 0.462% | |
| 👎 | 38 | 0.399% | |
| 😭 | 38 | 0.399% | |
| 24 further kinds | 278 | 2.92% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 216 of the 222 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,523 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 222 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 54 posts held from the last 30 days (5.56%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Je suis en direct sur @KateTVinterview : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IolXrJ1OnFA
❤7
Pour mes lecteurs francophones : vous trouverez ci-dessous un lien vers mon essai sur la fraude électorale. Il date de 2021 et sa version définitive se trouve dans le Volume II des Essais. https://stanislasberton.com/index.php/2019/10/12/de-la-fraude-electorale/
👍11
I have put online my essay on election fraud. It was written in 2021 following the 2020 presidential election and was included in the 2nd volume of my Essays. It remains relevant today and is included in my anthology of Essays : "Fighting globalism" https://stanislasberton.substack.com/p/electoral-fraud
👏2
Scandale du périscolaire parisien: les plannings étaient truffés d’erreurs et la justice n’en a pas été informée, permettant aux accusés d’être mis hors de cause car supposément pas seuls avec les enfants les jours des faits « C’est grave. Extrêmement grave. » Marie Grimaud, l’avocate qui défend quatre familles de victimes de violences sexuelles dans le périscolaire, est atterrée. À côté d’elle, dans le public, des …
🤬24🔥15😭4❤3😱1
Incompétence et laxisme ou tout simplement des pédocriminels qui protègent d'autres pédocriminels? Pourquoi est-ce si difficile d'admettre que des pédocriminels ont infiltré nos appareils d’État et se livrent à de la prédation systématique sur nos enfants?
💯28❤2👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤12🔥3
Et comme je l'ai expliqué, ce plan de libération ne concerne pas que l'Amérique mais le monde, via un axe patriote Amérique/Russie/Chine. Cette thèse peut tout à fait être contestée mais @LaurentOzon comment expliquez-vous par exemple cette reprise par Kiril Dmitriev, PDG du fonds souverain russe et envoyé spécial de V. Poutine de ce message de Q qui parle "d'une coordination russo-chinoise avec Trump pour détruire …
👏19👍4🥱2
Point de vue compréhensible, sauf qu'il existe ici un ensemble de faits et de décisions qui peuvent venir raisonnablement soutenir cette thèse. https://x.com/LaurentOzon/status/2118266333263520036 J'en ai fait la liste ici : https://x.com/StanislasBerton/status/2117511795380285829 Pour ne prendre qu'un exemple: pourquoi Trump a t'il signé dès 2018 un décret présidentiel (EO 13848) visant à mettre en place une st…
👍6👎3❤2💯2
Ceci est le premier échelon de la "démocratie constante" ("whole-process people's democracy", que j'explique en détail dans mon ouvrage "Comprendre la relation Chine-Occident), et dont je parlais ici il y a quelques jours : https://x.com/LAURENTMICHEL0N/status/2115620942772916440?a=NS5EoB3mS3AFcZYLdYk&s=20 Le second échelon concerne les 101 millions de membres du PCC, qui, tels des grands électeurs, votent sur les …
👍16❤2
Merci à Laurent Michelon de nous informer du processus démocratique qui existe bel et bien en Chine, y compris au niveau local et au sein du PCC. À bien des égards, la Chine "dictatoriale" est bien plus démocratique que nos fausses démocraties et le PCC défend bien plus et mieux les intérêts du peuple chinois que notre oligarchie mondialiste corrompue. Pour un point de vue différent et informé sur la Chine, je reco…
❤12👍6👌4🤔2
Pour illustrer par l'exemple le problème des RINOS: le gouverneur républicain du Texas, Abbot, a fait venir légalement près de 500K indiens durant son mandat. https://x.com/TaylorRMarshall/status/2118007180506882343
🤬14
Photo, posted without a caption
❤10👍2🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 222 posts we hold for @Stanislas_Berton. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Stanislas_Berton named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Stanislas Berton” (@Stanislas_Berton), 9,021 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Stanislas_Berton.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.