Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Arma Gray для фотографов

Channel

Arma Gray для фотографов

@arma_gray_ph

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,117subscribers

-76 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001792396830
TypeChannel
Username@arma_gray_ph
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/arma_gray_ph

Growth

7,1177,1937,1557 August 2026 — 7,193 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,193 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,190 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,180 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,169 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,160 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,154 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,140 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,137 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,131 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,123 subscribers6 September 2026 — 7,117 subscribers7 August 20266 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 30 days, net -76. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,106–7,204 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 11:377,117-6
2 Sept 2026, 10:167,123-8
30 Aug 2026, 16:397,131-6
27 Aug 2026, 05:537,137-3
24 Aug 2026, 01:447,140-14
20 Aug 2026, 12:057,154-6
17 Aug 2026, 12:497,160-9
14 Aug 2026, 00:267,169-11
10 Aug 2026, 12:067,180-10
7 Aug 2026, 13:237,190-3
7 Aug 2026, 06:307,193no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:237,193first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 27 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

279 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😱8630.8%
🔥4817.2%
4114.7%
🤣4014.3%
👍3612.9%
💯238.24%
custom 529179612985849521351.79%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 279 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 04:07 UTC472 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Всем привет, потеряли? Расскажу как-нибудь, куда я подевалась. А пока... Быстрая распродажа! Давно не было, и вряд-ли ещё будет в ближайшее время. Отдаю любой инфопродукт с канала @arma_photo за 1000₽. Трое суток. Пишите в ЛС @arma_gray

🔥65👍3

14 Jul 2026, 12:55 UTC≈1,140 views13 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Домен t.me перестал открываться в браузерах по всему миру Оператор доменной зоны приостановил делегирование домена t.me. Из-за этого ссылки на Telegram-каналы, ботов и публикации, размещённые на сторонних сайтах и других внешних площадках, перестали работать. Внутри самого Telegram ссылки t.me по-прежнему открываются корректно. Если вы привлекаете аудиторию в свои каналы или боты из внешнего интернета, рекомендую

👍7😱4💯2

24 May 2026, 10:55 UTC≈1,640 views20 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Существует популярный интернет-миф о том, что слово "бежевый" - это якобы аббревиатура от слов "белый" и "оранжевый". Это неправда. На самом деле, слово происходит от французского "beige" (натуральный цвет неокрашенной шерсти). А с точки зрения теории цвета, бежевый - это светлый от коричневого, а не простое смешение белого с оранжевым.

🔥9👍5💯42

21 May 2026, 13:01 UTC≈1,500 views21 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😱20👍1

21 May 2026, 13:00 UTC≈1,100 views16 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

😱14🔥2

21 May 2026, 12:57 UTC≈1,070 views5 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Ахтунг войс, всем прослушать.

😱41

13 May 2026, 04:18 UTC≈1,450 views53 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

#фотоюмор #юмор@arma_gray_ph #мем

🤣40💯9👍4

10 May 2026, 12:51 UTC≈1,170 views19 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @emoji_gray

📢 Минутка безопасности. Мошенники от имени поддержки ТГ рассылают письма о необходимости привязки аккаунта к госуслугам, иначе акк попадёт в режим "только чтение". Естественно, угонят всё что не прибито к полу.

😱123👍3💯1

8 May 2026, 15:05 UTC≈1,340 views23 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Всем почистить аватарки навсяк! Также шлюхоботы"без купальников": 😁👍

😱153🔥3👍1💯1

7 May 2026, 09:05 UTC≈1,100 views22 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Интересно, как это будет регулироваться

😱16👍4💯2

3 May 2026, 04:51 UTC≈4,250 views19 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Слышали про массовые блокировки акков в инсте? Несу ключевые причины и советы. Причины блокировок: 🔘 Перезалив чужого контента: Reels с чужими видео/аудио ИИ помечает как низкое качество или нарушение авторских прав. 🔘 Водяные знаки: логотипы TikTok, CapCut и т.п. резко снижают охваты и могут привести к блокировке при повторении. 🔘 Несоответствие обложки: кликбейт-обложки, не соответствующие содержимому, помечаются

🔥12👍4💯3

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @arma_gray_ph. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Lr - обработка фото - vk.com/lightroomcc
@ilovelightroomcc · 51,379
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 August 2026
Артём Гришин про фотографию
@grishin1 · 49,072
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Arma Gray для фотографов” (@arma_gray_ph), 7,117 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arma_gray_ph.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.