Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
55 measurements spanning 33 days, net -352. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 49,019–49,477 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Sept 2026, 12:39
49,072
-34
9 Sept 2026, 00:20
49,106
-29
6 Sept 2026, 05:17
49,135
-7
5 Sept 2026, 13:41
49,142
-17
3 Sept 2026, 23:21
49,159
-4
3 Sept 2026, 15:56
49,163
-15
2 Sept 2026, 14:33
49,178
no change
2 Sept 2026, 10:56
49,178
-12
1 Sept 2026, 16:03
49,190
no change
1 Sept 2026, 13:52
49,190
+1
31 Aug 2026, 19:05
49,189
-3
31 Aug 2026, 15:37
49,192
-9
30 Aug 2026, 15:57
49,201
no change
30 Aug 2026, 15:44
49,201
-18
29 Aug 2026, 13:56
49,219
no change
29 Aug 2026, 13:34
49,219
-6
28 Aug 2026, 17:05
49,225
-10
28 Aug 2026, 11:34
49,235
-2
27 Aug 2026, 18:45
49,237
-2
27 Aug 2026, 08:53
49,239
first reading
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.85%
avg views ÷ 49,072 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,380
1 post measured
Reaction rate
17.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 6 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026
Posts held
6 (8 June 2026 – 9 September 2026)
Views total
2,380
Reactions total
422
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Sept 2026, 10:40 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,940
Videos
≈227
Links
≈161
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
23s
Average length
23s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,321 reactions across 6 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
764
57.8%
❤
362
27.4%
❤🔥
43
3.26%
👍
40
3.03%
💯
37
2.80%
👏
24
1.82%
🎉
14
1.06%
🤗
11
0.833%
🌚
10
0.757%
😁
5
0.379%
😭
4
0.303%
🙈
4
0.303%
👨💻
2
0.151%
💔
1
0.076%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,321 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 6 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @grishin1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 6 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 June 2026 to 9 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Я стал отцом несколько месяцев назад, полностью погрузился в эту роль и выпал из соцсетей. Есть мысли, которые я осознал за это время, и мне хочется поделиться ими.
С рождением ребёнка всё очень быстро встаёт на свои места: приоритеты моментально меняются, а то, что ещё вчера казалось важным, уходит на второй план.
С рождением сына мой внутренний вопрос о том, каким человеком я хочу быть, поменялся на вопрос, каког…
Почему одним творцам всё, а другим ничего?
Недавно гуляли с товарищем, снимали стрит, и заодно сделали мне несколько фотографий. Всё-таки важно иногда не терять форму и самому оказываться по ту сторону фотоаппарата.
У нас завязался любопытный разговор об ограничениях в творчестве, почему одни творцы прогрессируют, реализовываются как профессионалы, зарабатывают на своем творчестве деньги, а другие нет.
Многие тво…
За что на самом деле платят деньги коммерческим фотографам и нейротворцам.
К посту я прикрепил сообщение, которое мне написал один из подписчиков. Он занимается изготовлением кожаных изделий. Я взялся за заказ и решил заодно показать, как строится такая работа.
Причём неважно, фотографируете вы или создаёте визуал через нейросети. Заказчику важен результат, а выбор инструмента это уже дело исполнителя.
Первое, что…
Процесс обработки фотографий больше не будет прежним?
Удивительно наблюдать, какие трансформации прямо сейчас происходят в мире обработки фотографий.
Если раньше за ретушью, цветокоррекцией, монтажом и работой с корректирующими инструментами нужно было сидеть часами, то теперь многие из этих задач можно делать за считанные минуты. В индустрии появляются инструменты, где достаточно словами описать, что вы хотите изм…
Вижу в сети упаднические настроения у творческих людей на тему просадок в доходе.
Но вместо того чтобы обсуждать, как всё стало плохо, хочу поделиться самым актуальным, что вижу прямо сейчас на практике. Есть связка, по которой фотографы и нейротворцы ставят работу на поток и продолжают зарабатывать хорошие деньги, даже в текущих реалиях.
К этому посту я прикрепил работы моей ученицы Анны Зарубиной, и это полностью…
Сегодня хочу поделиться с вами фотографиями Маши Иодис - моей ученицы и выпускницы курса PRIME.
Маша часто снимает детей на природе. А естественная среда создает особенный психологический контекст. Она стирает барьеры между героем и камерой и превращает съемочный процесс в игру и исследование.Именно в такой среде легче поймать настоящий момент, а не постановочную улыбку. Когда ребенок просто живет в моменте, фотогра…
🔥168❤29👍12👏5🤗3
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @grishin1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Lr - обработка фото - vk.com/lightroomcc @ilovelightroomcc · 51,379 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 August 2026
Вадим Панасюк. Школа фильммейкинга @vadim_panasiuk · 30,216 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Артём Гришин про фотографию” (@grishin1), 49,072 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/grishin1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.