Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Маша и продакшн

Channel

Маша и продакшн

@mashaiproduction

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,275subscribers

+284 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001575100471
TypeChannel
Username@mashaiproduction
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mashaiproduction

Growth

6,9917,2757,1337 August 2026 — 6,991 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,991 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,056 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,175 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,201 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,233 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,261 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,267 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,265 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,261 subscribers5 September 2026 — 7,275 subscribers7 August 20265 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 29 days, net +284. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,948–7,318 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 05:217,275+14
1 Sept 2026, 16:437,261-4
29 Aug 2026, 19:457,265-2
26 Aug 2026, 23:267,267+6
23 Aug 2026, 19:267,261+28
20 Aug 2026, 07:357,233+32
16 Aug 2026, 21:387,201+26
13 Aug 2026, 07:147,175+119
9 Aug 2026, 20:317,056+65
7 Aug 2026, 06:006,991no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:486,991first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.0%
avg views ÷ 7,275 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,680
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.65%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held11 (4 August 202619 August 2026)
Views total11,732
Reactions total897
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
52s
Average length
52s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,361 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
75955.8%
🔥32624.0%
custom 525154486459147027816612.2%
💔533.89%
💘433.16%
custom 5213306925374026092100.735%
😭30.22%
🤣10.073%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,361 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC992 views119 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

как для меня выглядит идеальная денимная съемка! бренд Still Here, фотограф Johnny Jordan

71🔥31custom 525154486459147027817

18 Aug 2026, 18:35 UTC≈1,650 views254 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

у вас нет своего мнения (и это влияет на творчество) substack автор Feifei пишет о том, что мы разучились думать, слышать себя и самовыражаться не по шаблону. практически на все у нас есть референс, муд, вайб, чужой залайканый комментарий, мнение «авторитета» или краткий пересказ чата gpt. поэтому и заметна культурная / смысловая и визуальная деградация. за редким исключением, конечно. everything is a copy of a copy

167🔥52custom 525154486459147027833💔2

16 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC≈1,620 views58 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

в этом месяце прочла Martyr by Kaveh Akbar. книга была в нашем субботнем английском клубе. честно, очень сложно. казалось я не понимаю ни слова, но при этом понимаю все. мне было непросто выразить свои эмоции на зумах, я испытала полный спектр чувств: от легкого раздражения до искренней злости и принятия. сюжет катает на эмоциональных качелях от страницы к странице. я раньше не сталкивалась с такими книгами, в хорош

32🔥13custom 525154486459147027813

14 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC≈1,950 views137 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

новый люкс — быть оффлайн. Polaroid даже посвятил этой теме всю летнюю маркетинговую стратегию, и я считаю ее одной из самых ироничных и живых за последнее время. the best of summer is analog no one on their deathbed ever said: i wish i’d spent more time on my phone очень хорошо поработали с посылами! мое любимое: go jump in some water before the data centers drink it all up. вы как, люкс? хотя если читаете этот п

77🔥36custom 525154486459147027824

13 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC≈1,750 views83 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

люблю визуал бренда Paris Texas. к осеннему сезону они собрали красивое сочетание цвета и текстур. телесные колготки с ярким педикюром тоже выглядят модно. берем на заметку.

🔥3833custom 525154486459147027812

11 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC≈1,910 views117 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

сначала подумала, что Paloma Wool выпустили новую серию, в которой смотрят на материнство через призму работы в фэшн. но это оказался проект испанской художницы Карлоты Герреро. (Карлота, кстати, и есть креативный директор «декретного» кампейна Паломы) несколько месяцев она вместе с младенцем посещала примерочные люксовых магазинов: просила принести одежду и туфли, брала бокал шампанского и фотографировала их отраж

65💔35🔥13😭3🤣1

9 Aug 2026, 09:47 UTC≈1,860 views129 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

вкладывать глубокие арт смыслы в съемки масс-маркета чаще всего бессмысленно, важнее придерживаться днк. но иногда хочется добавить какую-то авторскую «пасхалку» 🤩 так у меня вышло с этим кадром. я добавила письмо в сумку, и вот почему: а) в прошлом месяце прочла свою первую книгу на английском. в The Correspondent повествование идет о нашем времени, но исключительно через письма — мне показалось это по-хорошему оль

87💘26🔥16

6 Aug 2026, 19:47 UTC≈2,010 views87 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Были на открытии выставки «Версейс» художницы Алины Корякиной в артруме IRNBY 🐆 название выставки выбрано ироничное: в фильме «Шоугелз» Верховена главная героиня произносит Versace как «Версейс» (я, честно, не смотрела, захотелось!). акварель шикарная, кругом все в леопарде и экстра настроении. на контрасте, серия керамики «тюбики» выглядит очень смешно. кто в Петербурге, сходите обязательно! вход свободный.

44🔥20💔16custom 52515448645914702787

6 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC≈1,680 views131 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

вот уже и осеннюю предметку снимаем 🤩 захотелось обыграть классические сезонные сет-дизайновские решения, поэтому к листьям я придумала добавить пылесос, а к радиатору — носочки, которые на нем греются (помните, мамы в детстве так перед школой делали, чтобы нам было теплее?) креативный продюсер / mashkass (я) фотограф / leeezya сет дизайнер / ssaintnastya свет / muratov_photo, octa_light

🔥6252custom 525154486459147027817

5 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC≈1,710 views188 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

благодаря Ире, админу канала «Фу, годные советы» (нативно предлагаю подписаться), и фотографу Леше Булатову у канала новая аватарка! это я в какой-то эре, надеюсь околопраймовой 🤩

105custom 525154486459147027840🔥29💘14

4 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC≈1,700 views58 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Абсолютный рандом, который вдохновил меня за последние дни фэшн коллекция студентки Christell Saavedra, вдохновленная альбомом Розалии / печать на чеках / молескин @ _ilariacarli / съемка рубашек коллабы Camisas Manolo & Paloma Wool / съемка для релиза Chloe’s summer residences / хорошая статья на Substack: для меня про то, что нужно идти и делать руками, а не бесконечно скроллить референсы и изучать теорию / вспоми

26🔥16custom 521330692537402609210💘3custom 52515448645914702783

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @mashaiproduction. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Артём Гришин про фотографию
@grishin1 · 49,135
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Маша и продакшн” (@mashaiproduction), 7,275 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mashaiproduction.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.