Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for references

Channel

references

@referrences

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,380subscribers

+67 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001322838441
TypeChannel
Username@referrences
Created18 January 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/referrences

Growth

15,30815,38115,344.57 August 2026 — 15,313 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,313 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,314 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,313 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,308 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,320 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,326 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,332 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,331 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,326 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,338 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,341 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,343 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,346 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,350 subscribers22 August 2026 — 15,352 subscribers24 August 2026 — 15,353 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,347 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,356 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,354 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,360 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,366 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,374 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,376 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,377 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,381 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,380 subscribers15,3807 August 20263 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 27 days, net +67. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,297–15,392 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 17:1515,380-1
2 Sept 2026, 07:2715,381+4
1 Sept 2026, 07:1415,377+1
31 Aug 2026, 07:1815,376+2
30 Aug 2026, 10:3515,374+8
29 Aug 2026, 10:0415,366+6
28 Aug 2026, 10:3315,360+6
27 Aug 2026, 13:0715,354-2
26 Aug 2026, 16:3315,356+9
25 Aug 2026, 12:5415,347-6
24 Aug 2026, 11:5515,353+1
22 Aug 2026, 20:5515,352+2
21 Aug 2026, 07:2815,350+4
20 Aug 2026, 09:0315,346+3
19 Aug 2026, 10:5715,343+2
18 Aug 2026, 12:1415,341+3
17 Aug 2026, 12:1415,338+12
16 Aug 2026, 03:3815,326-5
14 Aug 2026, 12:1715,331-1
13 Aug 2026, 02:1415,332first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.01%
avg views ÷ 15,380 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,080
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held15 (27 July 20263 September 2026)
Views total12,937
Reactions total330
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

375 reactions across 15 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
35093.3%
custom 5314755311330941100133.47%
custom 5325744912870692190123.20%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 375 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 15 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @referrences. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 08:03 UTC345 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Школа современной фотографии Докдокдок объявляет конкурс на бесплатное обучение по программам «Документальная фотография и фотожурналистика» и «Опыты современной фотографии», а также на места со скидкой на обучение в размере 50%. Выпускники фотошколы Докдокдок были победителями и призерами World Press Photo, Picture of the Year, Sony World Photography Awards, Leica Oskar Barnack Award, Foam Talents и сотен других пр

4

28 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC≈1,150 views19 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Proenza Schouler Fall 2026 Campaign By Laura Marie Cieplik Stylist Marika-Ella Ames Hair Dylan Chavles Makeup Erin Green Md Mawena Takpa, Masha Silchenko, Jessie Krish @referrences #20s@referrences

19

27 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC≈1,150 views69 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026

У вашего бессменного админа (то есть у меня) сегодня день рождения! Принимаю поздравления в комментариях и сюда 2202208327935913, куплю себе торт от вас или колье с самолетиком, которое давно хочу. Лучше колье! Вас тоже поздравляю, потому что если бы я не родилась и не создала канал, чтобы вы тогда смотрели💅

47custom 532574491287069219012custom 531475531133094110010

26 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC≈1,230 views20 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Wallpaper Magazine September 2026 By Antoine&Charlie Stylist Jason Hughes Hair Chris Sweeney Makeup Megumi Matsuno Md Aylah Peterson @referrences #20s@referrences

20

24 Aug 2026, 06:10 UTC≈1,280 views22 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

W Magazine July 2026 By Zoe Ghertner Stylist Charlotte Collet Hair Lucas Willson Makeup Lilly Pollan Md Ida Heiner @referrences #20s@referrences

19custom 53147553113309411003

22 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC868 views20 reactionsread 26 August 2026
Photo

Harper's Bazaar U.S. September 2026 By Robin Galiegue Stylist Malina Joseph Gilchrist Hair Shay Ashual Makeup Lauren Parsons Md Céline Dion @referrences #20s@referrences

20

16 Aug 2026, 07:52 UTC≈1,840 views56 reactions1 Starread 26 August 2026
Photo

French Vogue August 2026 By Purienne Hair Alexandrine Piel, Stephane Lancien Makeup Aaron de Mey Md Cindy Bruna, Lennon Sorrenti @referrences #20s@referrences

56

14 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC≈1,340 views30 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

DKNY The Fragrance 2000 by Mikael Jansson Md Esther Canadas&Mark Vanderloo @referrences #0010s@referrences

30

13 Aug 2026, 13:05 UTC≈1,290 views20 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

‘Colour Photography’ by Tim Walker for L’uomo Vogue April 2004 Makeup&hair Janine Trott @referrences #0010s@referrences

20

13 Aug 2026, 09:22 UTC727 views26 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Ralph Lauren Collection S/S 2000 By Mario Testino Md Fernanda Tavares @referrences #0010s@referrences

26

13 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC547 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Ищешь творческую работу? Мечтаешь зарабатывать красиво? Организуй свадьбы и забирай с каждой от 100 000 рублей уже в этом сезоне! 🩷 Приходи на бесплатную онлайн-встречу "КАК СТАТЬ СВАДЕБНЫМ ОРГАНИЗАТОРОМ ЗА 2 МЕСЯЦА" и узнаешь: 🩶 секреты профессии, о которых молчат организаторы свадеб 🩶 сколько на самом деле зарабатывают организаторы в твоем городе 🩶 где прячутся клиенты и как их привлечь без опыта и отзывов 🩶 где

2

9 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC≈1,170 views42 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Violet Papers July 2026 By Elizaveta Porodina Hair Yumiko Hikage Makeup Karin Westerlund Set Designer Isabelle Clotten Md Ivy Stewart @referrences #20s@referrences

42

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @referrences. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

f/64
@sixtyfourmag · 71,839
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 20 August 2026
Argentum
@fotoartset · 49,537
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026
Артём Гришин про фотографию
@grishin1 · 49,159
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“references” (@referrences), 15,380 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/referrences.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.