Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for gunblog

Channel

gunblog

@gunblog

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,707subscribers

-70 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001369775352
TypeChannel
Username@gunblog
Created16 February 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/gunblog

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,7078,7788,742.56 August 2026 — 8,777 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,777 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,778 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,775 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,772 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,765 subscribers21 August 2026 — 8,762 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,758 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,763 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,752 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,748 subscribers8 September 2026 — 8,729 subscribers12 September 2026 — 8,714 subscribers16 September 2026 — 8,707 subscribers6 August 202616 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 40 days, net -70. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,696–8,789 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 01:398,707-7
12 Sept 2026, 08:398,714-15
8 Sept 2026, 09:168,729-19
2 Sept 2026, 23:148,748-4
30 Aug 2026, 16:018,752-11
27 Aug 2026, 14:178,763+5
24 Aug 2026, 07:488,758-4
21 Aug 2026, 00:338,762-3
17 Aug 2026, 18:388,765-7
14 Aug 2026, 04:598,772-3
10 Aug 2026, 19:188,775-3
7 Aug 2026, 20:128,778+1
6 Aug 2026, 21:158,777no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:078,777first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 30 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

807 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
44555.1%
🔥26032.2%
❤‍🔥8610.7%
👍80.991%
💋80.991%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 807 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTC≈1,710 views72 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Дописываем обработку 🌚

🔥4125👍6

22 Jul 2026, 19:28 UTC≈3,180 views132 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Поснимали

🔥71❤‍🔥3625

22 Jul 2026, 12:55 UTC≈2,640 views20 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Я тут сегодня на Кэнон снимаю Я так понимаю, они так и не научились заряжаться при съемке в ноут 🙃

🔥191

21 Jul 2026, 11:46 UTC≈2,310 views178 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Posted without readable text

123🔥49❤‍🔥6

22 Jun 2026, 13:39 UTC≈3,560 views186 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Пленочка

115🔥43❤‍🔥26👍2

2 Jun 2026, 11:08 UTC≈4,250 views187 reactionsread 28 August 2026

так! делаю группу антикризисную, для тех кто в упадке, на дне, депрессует, руки опукскает и тд давайте пересчитаем себя, кто в таком же состоянии будем не спеша делать мудборды и что то снимать. лучи поддержки и все такое свои редкие активности в соц сетях поддержим друг у друга короче мы на дне соберемся и потусуемся группа проживет до конца года, потом удалю, никаких реклам и прогревов там @yatolkosprosit

124🔥37❤‍🔥18💋8

30 May 2026, 09:13 UTC≈3,540 views32 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Покажите последние сохраненки

32

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @gunblog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Медведев Фотография
@fotomedvedev · 27,457
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
@gustarev [365] 🔥
@gustarev365 · 24,538
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 16 September 2026
VISIONROOM
@visionroom · 23,847
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 September 2026
DONETS
@donetsraw · 31,989
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 6 September 2026
Артём Гришин про фотографию
@grishin1 · 48,949
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026
time vs. vogue
@time_vs_vogue · 33,502
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 September 2026
Виктория Трегубова | Фотошоп • Лайтрум • Capture one
@tregubova_photoshop · 26,494
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 September 2026
МАКС ДОБРЫЙ ПЕЧАТАЕТ...
@maksimdobryy · 30,100
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 September 2026
ЛОКАЛС | Локации Москвы
@localshere · 47,462
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026
f/64
@sixtyfourmag · 71,709
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“gunblog” (@gunblog), 8,707 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gunblog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.