Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for کانال ارز دلار | ARZDOLAR

Channel

کانال ارز دلار | ARZDOLAR

@arzdolar

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

62,438subscribers

+624 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001006924936
TypeChannel
Username@arzdolar
Created24 September 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 October 2026
Measurements held52
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/arzdolar

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

61,64262,46362,052.55 August 2026 — 61,814 subscribers6 August 2026 — 61,814 subscribers6 August 2026 — 61,815 subscribers7 August 2026 — 61,798 subscribers7 August 2026 — 61,786 subscribers9 August 2026 — 61,778 subscribers10 August 2026 — 61,764 subscribers11 August 2026 — 61,743 subscribers12 August 2026 — 61,735 subscribers13 August 2026 — 61,726 subscribers14 August 2026 — 61,715 subscribers16 August 2026 — 61,694 subscribers17 August 2026 — 61,674 subscribers18 August 2026 — 61,664 subscribers19 August 2026 — 61,645 subscribers20 August 2026 — 61,650 subscribers21 August 2026 — 61,642 subscribers23 August 2026 — 61,650 subscribers24 August 2026 — 61,754 subscribers25 August 2026 — 61,770 subscribers26 August 2026 — 61,788 subscribers27 August 2026 — 61,785 subscribers28 August 2026 — 61,780 subscribers29 August 2026 — 61,791 subscribers30 August 2026 — 61,804 subscribers31 August 2026 — 61,834 subscribers1 September 2026 — 61,864 subscribers2 September 2026 — 61,943 subscribers4 September 2026 — 61,939 subscribers7 September 2026 — 62,014 subscribers10 September 2026 — 62,091 subscribers12 September 2026 — 62,114 subscribers14 September 2026 — 62,118 subscribers15 September 2026 — 62,129 subscribers18 September 2026 — 62,117 subscribers29 September 2026 — 62,177 subscribers5 October 2026 — 62,344 subscribers9 October 2026 — 62,405 subscribers13 October 2026 — 62,451 subscribers14 October 2026 — 62,463 subscribers15 October 2026 — 62,462 subscribers16 October 2026 — 62,450 subscribers17 October 2026 — 62,437 subscribers19 October 2026 — 62,428 subscribers20 October 2026 — 62,418 subscribers21 October 2026 — 62,414 subscribers22 October 2026 — 62,444 subscribers23 October 2026 — 62,438 subscribers24 October 2026 — 62,435 subscribers25 October 2026 — 62,432 subscribers26 October 2026 — 62,435 subscribers27 October 2026 — 62,438 subscribers62,4385 August 202627 October 2026
52 measurements spanning 83 days, net +624. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 61,519–62,586 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 52
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Oct 2026, 11:3662,438+3
26 Oct 2026, 08:4862,435+3
25 Oct 2026, 10:5062,432-3
24 Oct 2026, 13:3662,435-3
23 Oct 2026, 12:0762,438-6
22 Oct 2026, 13:4462,444+30
21 Oct 2026, 05:4962,414-4
20 Oct 2026, 03:1662,418-10
19 Oct 2026, 02:5462,428-9
17 Oct 2026, 23:3762,437-13
16 Oct 2026, 22:2862,450-12
15 Oct 2026, 23:2762,462-1
14 Oct 2026, 21:3962,463+12
13 Oct 2026, 15:2062,451+46
9 Oct 2026, 21:1862,405+61
5 Oct 2026, 13:3762,344+167
29 Sept 2026, 17:4162,177+60
18 Sept 2026, 03:5562,117-12
15 Sept 2026, 19:5962,129+11
14 Sept 2026, 03:4162,118first reading

Engagement

1,965 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 165 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.7%
avg views ÷ 62,438 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,920
635 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
635
of 1,965 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 October 2026
Posts held1,965 (5 August 2026 – 27 October 2026)
Views total5,028,664
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Oct 2026, 08:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 0.1%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @arzdolar. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 14 September 2026 to 27 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Oct 2026, 08:17 UTC466 viewsread 27 October 2026

🔔 #دلار تهران = 273,700 #تتر (تومان) = 271,900

27 Oct 2026, 08:16 UTC587 viewsread 27 October 2026

🔔 #دلار تهران = 273,800 #تتر (تومان) = 271,700

27 Oct 2026, 08:09 UTC≈1,210 viewsread 27 October 2026

🔔 #دلار تهران = 273,700 #تتر (تومان) = 271,399

27 Oct 2026, 08:08 UTC≈1,330 viewsread 27 October 2026

🔔 #دلار تهران = 273,800 #تتر (تومان) = 271,399

27 Oct 2026, 08:07 UTC≈1,360 viewsread 27 October 2026

🔔 #دلار تهران = 273,500 #تتر (تومان) = 271,350

27 Oct 2026, 08:04 UTC≈1,610 viewsread 27 October 2026

🔔 #دلار تهران = 273,300 #تتر (تومان) = 271,349

27 Oct 2026, 07:48 UTC≈2,480 viewsread 27 October 2026

🔔 #دلار تهران = 273,000 #تتر (تومان) = 269,700

27 Oct 2026, 07:36 UTC≈3,050 viewsread 27 October 2026

🔔 #دلار تهران = 272,700 #تتر (تومان) = 269,700

27 Oct 2026, 07:28 UTC≈3,320 viewsread 27 October 2026

🔔 #دلار تهران = 272,500 #تتر (تومان) = 269,700

26 Oct 2026, 17:01 UTC≈8,140 viewsread 27 October 2026

🔔 #دلار تهران = 271,700 #تتر (تومان) = 270,590

26 Oct 2026, 16:24 UTC≈8,580 viewsread 27 October 2026

🔔 #دلار تهران = 271,800 #تتر (تومان) = 270,660

26 Oct 2026, 16:07 UTC≈8,770 viewsread 27 October 2026

🔔 #دلار تهران = 272,000 #تتر (تومان) = 270,840

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,965 posts we hold for @arzdolar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Iranjib | ایران جیب
@iranjib_ir · 134,572
#1
LiveData.IR | سایت لایودیتا
@livedata_ir · 12,541
#2
Behnam Samadi | بهنام صمدی
@BehnamSamadi_ir · 61,392
#3
بازار پایه | نگاه تحلیلی به اقتصاد و بازارهای مالی |
@only_otc · 12,659
#4
قیمت لحظه ای دلار ، ارز ، سکه و طلا
@irancurrency · 282,425
#5
خبرهای فوری مهم 🔖
@khabar_fouri · 1,253,660
#6
پیکنیک تحلیل
@PiknikAnalyst · 115,610
#7
بتا سهم
@betasahm1 · 127,493
#8
Nobitex | نوبیتکس
@nobitexmarket · 316,983
#9
Iran International ایران اینترنشنال
@iranintltv · 1,368,528
#10
Alireza.S
@cryptobyalireza · 36,814
#11
توییتر_بورس
@twitter_bourse · 71,083
#12
تترلند | Tether Land
@TetherLand · 71,552
#13
اخبار بورس | Tse Press
@tsepress · 65,864
#14
گنگ خواب دیده
@mortezaebad · 50,788
#15
بلومبرگ فارسی
@persiannbloomberg · 110,164
#16
Azadi | آزادی
@sepehrazadi · 344,716
#17
پایگاه خبری انتخاب
@entekhab_ir · 205,195
#18
اخبار خودرو
@khodro_akhbar · 412,950
#19
سید مهدی طباطبایی / حجم سبز
@hajme_sabzzz · 38,116
#20
Proxy MTProto
@proxymtproto · 11,882,432
#21
ورزش سه
@varzesh3 · 1,298,645
#22
Vahid Online وحید آنلاین
@vahidonline · 1,390,072
#23
مملکته
@mamlekate · 561,880
#24
BBCPersian
@bbcpersian · 770,221
#25
VPN CLUB
@wbnet · 227,829
#26
اخبار فوری / مهم 🔖
@akhbare_fouri · 1,017,084
#27
آخرین خبر
@akharinkhabar · 1,921,738
#28
Zoomit | زومیت
@thezoomit · 132,326
#29
اتحادیه تلفن همراه مشهد
@etehadiehmobilemashhad · 5,447
#30

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

قیمت لحظه ای دلار
@sarafha_rate · 31,840
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کانال ارز دلار | ARZDOLAR” (@arzdolar), 62,438 subscribers as measured 27 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arzdolar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.