Channel
@asseraaalsham1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
43,569subscribers
+1,083 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001125348779 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @asseraaalsham1 |
| Description | فأما الزبد فيذهب جفاءً وأما ما ينفع الناس فيمكث في الأرض |
| Created | 9 September 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/asseraaalsham1 |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 18:42 | 43,569 | +106 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 14:41 | 43,463 | +428 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 19:37 | 43,035 | +4 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 07:06 | 43,031 | +13 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:25 | 43,018 | +14 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:14 | 43,004 | +55 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:42 | 42,949 | +65 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 42,884 | +38 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:43 | 42,846 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 42,845 | +3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:19 | 42,842 | +100 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 42,742 | +10 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:48 | 42,732 | -13 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:19 | 42,745 | -35 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:58 | 42,780 | +18 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 42,762 | +12 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 03:12 | 42,750 | -7 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 09:22 | 42,757 | +6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:53 | 42,751 | +23 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:43 | 42,728 | first reading |
149 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 149 (1 August 2026 – 10 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,707,330 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Sept 2026, 00:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 30 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
#انفجار_سرمدا - ذكرت سابقاً وأظنّ صار الأمر أوضح من الشمس في رابعة النهار أنّ كل تفجيرات المستودعات في الشمال هي مفتعلة وبعلم السلطة أحياناً وبتنفيذها أحياناً أخرى. - وذكرت أنّ من مهام السلطة وشروط مشغلّيها القيام بعملية تنظيف لكل القديمين من سوريين ومهاجرين. - الذي حدث هو أنّ أبو سليمان دارة عزة وكان يعمل أمني مقرب من الجولاني قبل التحرير وهو من هؤلاء القديمين ومن التيار الجهادي السوري الذي كان يعطي فرصة للشر…
Photo, posted without a caption
#سقوط_المخا - لن أدخل بالنظرية التي تقول السعودية اتفقت مع الحوثي ليتوسع بعيداً عن حدودها الجنوبية مقابل لا يتقدم باتجاه جنوب السعودية ، فالسعودية أكبر الخاسرين من إغلاق باب المندب - السؤال المحيّر هو رغم امتلاك قوات عدن غطاء جوي منذ تحرير عدن ومع ذلك يخسرون برياً أمام الحوثي فلماذا ؟ - الأسباب كثيرة و أهمها هو محاولة محمد بن سلمان الجمع بين نقيضين قتال الحوثي وإبعاد حزب الإصلاح وتفكيك قواته. - كل الدعم صبّ ع…
Photo, posted without a caption
هذا الشغل الصح كل مجموعة كلاب تعتقل أي شخص بتهمة نقد السلطة على الأهالي التوجه للمخفر وإخراجهم بالقوة وصلنا لمرحلة يعتقلون الشخص لنقده تكريم السلطة لشخصيات من النظام السابق والله إن بقوا سنة أخرى لنترحم على أيام الأسد
#عارٌ_إلى_يوم_القيامة باختصار شديد وبدون تفاصيل سيبقى عار إلى يوم القيامة على جبين الشرع وفضيله وكل قيادي معهم وكل مؤيد لهم. أنّ حكم حافظ الأسد والخنزير بشار ابنه حافظوا على قمم جبل الشيخ تحت السيادة السورية منذ عام ١٩٧٣ إلى عام ٢٠٢٤ بينما الشرع بأقل من سنة في عهده صارت بيد اسرائيل وكل يومين يخرج لنا وزير دفاع ورئيس وزراء يهينون سوريا كلها من قمة هذا الجبل الأشمّ. السؤال مالذي كان يمنع قادة اسرائيل من الس…
Photo, posted without a caption
هذه السلطة تتمنى بقاء الأخ مجدي في السجن فلا تنتظروا منها شيء ليس هناك خيار للإفراج عنه سوى الضغط على المصالح الفرنسية في سوريا مثل ميناء اللاذقية وتنظيم اعتصام أمام سفارة فرنسا في بيروت و بعض الحركات الأمنية ضد من كان سبباً في اعتقاله عندما يزورون سوريا.
هو بالأصل لا يوجد مشروع انفصال هم رفعوا السقف ليحصلوا على إدارة ذاتية كاملة والشرع عرض عليهم حكم ذاتي كامل حتى بدون دخول أي عنصر من السلطة للسويداء الحرس الوطني يصبح تابع للجيش والأمن التابع للسويداء يصبح أمن عام يعني فقط السويداء ترفع علم الدولة وهذا التنازل الهائل هو من الشرع وليس من السويداء هو يريد إغلاق هذا الملف بأي وسيلة لكن حتى الآن لم يوافق الهجري ولا كثير من الذين معه
محافظ درعا شاطر تقوم بوليمة لعرس ابنك تكلف خمسين ألف $ لكن مثل هذا المواطن الثائر المعتقل في صيدنايا تتركونه سنة ونصف يجوب الشوارع بلا مساعدة ولا مأوى حتى وصل به الحال لبتر قدميه
#تسريبات_عملية_طوفان_الأقصى - ذكرت منذ أول يوم أن هناك تحقيقات اسرائيلية عن كيف تبخر اللواء الجنوبي وفرقة غزة وكيف ضباط من فرقة غزة أخذوا إجازة قبل يوم من العملية. - حقيقة بعد بحث مضنٍ وصلت لنفس قناعة أحداث ١١ سيبتمبر وهي : - اسرائيل ولنقل جهة معينة داخلها علمت بوقوع عملية ضد اسرائيل وتركتها تمضي لتستغلها ضد نتنياهو وفي حسابات سياسية داخلية لكنها لم تكن تعلم أنه هكذا سيكون حجم وضخامة العملية ولا نتائجها نهائ…
أس الصراع في الشام pinned a photo
Showing the 12 most recent of 149 posts we hold for @asseraaalsham1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@asseraaalsham1 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 40 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أس الصراع في الشام” (@asseraaalsham1), 43,569 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/asseraaalsham1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.