🎀 CONCOURS INSTAGRAM & TWITTER POUR NOTRE GRAND RETOUR ! TENTEZ DE REMPORTER LE LIVRE FIQH AL-ÛSRAH AL-MÛSLIMAH DE SHAYKH SULAYMANE AR-RÛHAYLI حفظه الله & TABARRÛJ DE LA SHAYKHA NI’MA SIDQI ⭐️ Pour célébrer le retour officiel de notre librairie, nous ouvrons ce magnifique concours pour tenter de remporter ces livres remplis de science, concernant la femme et la famille musulmane ! 💐 Conditions disponibles sur nos …

Channel
Avec Science - بعلم
@avecscience
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,844subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001974823251 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @avecscience |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 1 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/avecscience |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:24 | 3,844 | no change |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:31 | 3,844 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.0%
- avg views ÷ 3,844 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 423
- 12 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 12
- of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (12 August 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,075 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Sept 2026, 07:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 21m 32s
- Average length
- 10m 46s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Cheikh Muhammad Ibn Khalifa At-Tamimi حفظه الله a dit : « Parmi les signes de l’amour pour le Prophète ﷺ, le fait de le suivre et de s’attacher à sa Sunnah. Suivre le Prophète ﷺ, le prendre pour exemple, cheminer sur sa voie, s’accrocher à sa Sunnah, marcher sur ses traces, suivre ses paroles et ses actes, se conformer à ses ordres, s’éloigner de ce qu’il a interdit, adopter ses bonnes manières dans la difficulté c…
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته ⭐️ Nous revenons avec une excellente nouvelle ! Suite à une longue absence remplie de doutes, d’incertitudes, d’obstacles mais surtout : de volonté, de motivation & d’enthousiasme… Nous vous annonçons que nous reprenons officiellement en main Maktaba As-Salihat, avec l’ouverture d’un site prévu pour Septembre & de nouvelles aventures ! 🌸 Après de nombreux messages sollicitant un re…
🎥 Ils n’aiment pas le Prophète ! 🎙 Le shaykh 'Abd Al-'Aziz Ibn Baz 🔗 t.me/lesentierdusalut
Cheikh Muhammad Al-Bachir Al-Ibrahimi Al-Djazairi رحمه الله a dit : « Muhammad ﷺ vous demande d'établir la religion pas d'établir le mawlid, certes votre religion est une religion de faits, d'actes et de suivi, revenez donc à ces faits et faites triompher Allah, Il vous fera triompher. » 📖 • Athar Al-Imam Muhammad Al-Bachir Al-Ibrahimi, 4/144. 💠 https://t.me/avecscience
L’imam Malikite, Abu Ishaq Ash-Shatibi Al-Maliki - M.790H - رحمه الله a dit : « Parmi elles [les innovations] : désigner le jour de la naissance du prophète ﷺ comme une fête. » 📖 • Al-I’tisam, p.38. 💠 https://t.me/avecscience
Cheikh Rabi’ Ibn Hadi Al-Madkhali رحمه الله a dit : « Le jour de la naissance du Prophète ﷺ, pourquoi le Messager n’a-t’il pas instauré la célébration du mawlid ? Quand on a interrogé le Messager ﷺ au sujet du lundi, il répondit : "C’est le jour où je suis né." Mais a-t-il spécifié ce jour par la célébration du mawlid ? Non. Les compagnons et la communauté ont lié la datation du calendrier par son émigration ﷺ et n…
📹 Le Mawlid : entre les savants Malikites et les arguments de Said Al-Kamali 🎙️Réfutation du Cheikh Mohsin Jamri حفظه الله https://youtu.be/SUhkZMUPFjI?si=DierdTp88SoRhABJ
⁉️ Comment comptes-tu célébrer le Mawlid sans même connaître avec certitude le jour de sa naissance !? Cheikh ‘Abd Ar-Razzaq Al-Badr حفظه الله a dit : « Cette divergence¹ concernant le jour de sa naissance [au Prophète] ﷺ du mois de Rabi’ Al-Awwal fait justement parti des preuves avancées par les savants sur le fait que ne découle de son jour de naissance aucun jugement religieux, le cas échéant, s'il en découlait …
Cheikh ‘Abd Ar-Rahman As-Sa’di رحمه الله a dit : « La plus grande des grâces est qu’Allah fasse aimer la foi au serviteur, l’embellisse dans son cœur, lui en fasse goûter sa douceur, que ses membres se soumettent à la mise en pratique des prescriptions de l’islam et qu’Allah Lui fasse détester les différents interdits. Et Allah sait parfaitement qui est digne de recevoir de Lui cette grâce et Il est sage dans la ma…
{Il interroge : "A quand, le Jour de la Résurrection ?" Lorsque la vue sera éblouie, et que la lune s’éclipsera, et que le soleil et la lune seront réunis, l’homme, ce jour-là, dira : "Où fuir ?" Non ! Point de refuge ! Vers ton Seigneur sera, ce jour-là, le retour. L’homme sera informé ce jour-là de ce qu’il aura avancé et de ce qu’il aura remis à plus tard. Mais l’homme sera un témoin perspicace contre lui-même.}
Ibn Hajar Al-‘Asqalani رحمه الله a dit : « Abu Musa Al-Ash’ari رضي الله عنه rapporte : Le soleil s’éclipsa et le Prophète ﷺ se leva, craignant que ce ne soit [un prélude de certains signes de] l’Heure [du jour de la résurrection]. Il se rendit alors à la mosquée et pria en restant debout, incliné et prosterné le plus longtemps que je l’avais jamais vu faire. Puis il ﷺ dit : "Ces signes qu’Allah envoie ne surviennent…
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @avecscience. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@kounisalafiya · 35,122
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
@morjaneabudawud · 37,095
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
@scienceprofitable · 35,132
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 2 September 2026
@ceci_est_notre_croyance · 34,500
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 3 September 2026
@BilalAbouHafsa · 36,245
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Avec Science - بعلم” (@avecscience), 3,844 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/avecscience.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.