👤 Canal du frère Djily Cheikh Abou Maymouna As-Singhāly (حفظه الله)
ℹ️ Étudiant en science en Égypte et à Médine
📚Diplomé de l’institut de Shaykh Ali Moussa حفظه الله
Contact :
✉️ [email protected]
Created
Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 90 days, net +2,617. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,499–28,902 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 16:47
28,509
+32
6 Nov 2026, 18:27
28,477
+73
5 Nov 2026, 18:01
28,404
+46
4 Nov 2026, 18:16
28,358
+88
3 Nov 2026, 20:29
28,270
+126
2 Nov 2026, 21:55
28,144
+20
1 Nov 2026, 19:51
28,124
+40
31 Oct 2026, 17:15
28,084
+29
30 Oct 2026, 15:17
28,055
+30
29 Oct 2026, 12:47
28,025
+14
28 Oct 2026, 10:56
28,011
+17
27 Oct 2026, 12:51
27,994
+8
26 Oct 2026, 13:20
27,986
+9
25 Oct 2026, 12:57
27,977
+1
24 Oct 2026, 15:30
27,976
-5
23 Oct 2026, 17:38
27,981
+8
22 Oct 2026, 20:30
27,973
+7
21 Oct 2026, 15:20
27,966
+16
20 Oct 2026, 08:19
27,950
+13
19 Oct 2026, 06:37
27,937
first reading
Engagement
316 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 134 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.55%
avg views ÷ 28,509 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,720
90 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.896%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
116
of 316 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 75 of 90 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
316 (29 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
245,066
Reactions total
1,841
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 03:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
548
Videos
236
Links
985
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
23m 41s
Average length
1m 08s
Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,256 reactions across 185 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,680
70.0%
👍
938
17.8%
💯
263
5.00%
👏
59
1.12%
🔥
50
0.951%
😭
39
0.742%
💔
32
0.609%
🥰
30
0.571%
⚡
29
0.552%
✍
28
0.533%
🍓
20
0.381%
🎉
17
0.323%
🤝
16
0.304%
🤯
10
0.19%
🏆
9
0.171%
👌
8
0.152%
🤩
8
0.152%
💊
6
0.114%
😁
5
0.095%
😱
5
0.095%
3 further kinds
4
0.076%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 193 of the 316 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,256 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 316 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 116 posts held from the last 30 days (5.17%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
📚 شرح منهج السالكين وتوضيح الفقه في الدين للشيخ عبد الرحمن السعدي رحمه الله
🔈 الــــ9️⃣ـــدرس:
🎙جلي شيخ أبو ميمونة
_
📚 Explication de Minhaj As-Salikin de Shaykh Abd-Rahman As-Sa’di رحمه الله
🔈 Cours N°9️⃣:
🎙Djily Cheikh Abou Maymouna
#منهج_السالكين
-
📱 Rejoins-nous sur nos différents réseaux : https://linktr.ee/LesAssisesBenefiques1444
🚨AUJOURD’HUI COURS N°9🚨
Explication du livre :
« Minhaj As-Salikin » dans la jurisprudence hanbalite
De Shaykh Abd-Rahman Ibn Nāsir As-Sa’di رحمه الله
🇸🇳18h30
🇫🇷 19h30
🇪🇬 20h30
🚨Attention au changement d’horaire🚨
En direct sur Télégram & TikTok:
📱 https://t.me/LesAssisesBenefiques
📱 https://www.tiktok.com/@les_assises_benefiques
✔️Partage recommandé
Les Assises Bénéfiques pinned «📚 PLAYLIST DE TOUS LES LIVRES AYANT ÉTÉ EXPLIQUÉ SUR LA CHAÎNE 🎙 Enseignant : Djily Cheikh Abou Maymouna حفظه الله 📖 1. La croyance authentique de l’Imam Ibn Barjass رحمه الله 🔹 Accéder à la playlist YouTube 📖 2. Les fondements de la Sunnah de l’Imam…»
📚 PLAYLIST DE TOUS LES LIVRES AYANT ÉTÉ EXPLIQUÉ SUR LA CHAÎNE
🎙 Enseignant : Djily Cheikh Abou Maymouna حفظه الله
📖 1. La croyance authentique de l’Imam Ibn Barjass رحمه الله
🔹 Accéder à la playlist YouTube
📖 2. Les fondements de la Sunnah de l’Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal رحمه الله
🔹 Accéder à la playlist YouTube
📖 3. Quelques règles sur le comportement de l’étudiant en science, basé sur le l’ouvrage de Badr Ad-Din …
🎙 LA FEMME MUSULMANE ET LA QUÊTE DE LA SCIENCE (PARTIE 2)
👤 Djily Cheikh Abou Maymouna
📆 24 Joumada Al-Oula 1448 (correspondant au 5 novembre 2026)
#conférences
_
📱 Rejoins-nous sur nos différents réseaux : https://linktr.ee/LesAssisesBenefiques1444
✔️Partage recommandé
✅✅✅✅﷽ ✅✅✅✅
🚨N’OUBLIEZ PAS NOTRE RENDEZ-VOUS DE CE SOIR🚨
« LA FEMME MUSULMANE ET LA QUÊTE DE LA SCIENCE » PT.2
📆 JEUDI 5 NOVEMBRE
⌚️🇸🇳 18h30 / 🇫🇷 19h30 / 🇪🇬 20h30
🔹En direct sur Télégram et TikTok
📱 Suivez les cours en direct sur nos différentes plateformes : https://linktr.ee/LesAssisesBenefiques1444
✔️ Partage recommandé
❤19👍14🥰2🍓1👌1💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 316 posts we hold for @LesAssisesBenefiques. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @LesAssisesBenefiques as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
27 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
4 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
13 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Polls
The 6 most recent of 31 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Selon le madhab Hanbalite, tous ce qui sort des deux orifices annule les ablutions
Vrai88%
Faux12%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 316 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
📚Dourous ahl as-Sunnah📚 دروس أهل السنة @yanisabouimran · 29,298#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
📚Dourous ahl as-Sunnah📚 دروس أهل السنة @yanisabouimran · 29,298 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 September 2026
Al fourqan @al_fourqane · 19,005 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 3 October 2026
Ceci est notre croyance @ceci_est_notre_croyance · 34,230 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 3 September 2026
Bilal Abou Hafsa @BilalAbouHafsa · 45,252 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 1 September 2026
العلم الشرعي - La science légiférée @science_legiferee · 25,884 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 September 2026
Science profitable قناة العلم النافع @scienceprofitable · 35,032 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 2 September 2026
Omra Du Savoir @OmraDuSavoir · 23,012 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 September 2026
Institut Al Ihsan @institutALihsan · 23,939 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 September 2026
Salatijab @salatijab · 19,203 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 3 October 2026
Abdullah al Albani @AbdullahalAlbani · 26,750 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 September 2026
قناة كونـي سلفيّة على الجادة @kounisalafiya · 35,109 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
𝐋𝐄𝐒 𝐂𝐋𝐄𝐅𝐒 𝐃𝐔 𝐁𝐈𝐄𝐍 @les_clefs_du_bien · 20,428 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 September 2026
Le Saint Coran Arabe-Wolof @Le_saint_coran_arabe_wolof · 27,630 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 September 2026
Morjane Abu Dawud @morjaneabudawud · 36,524 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
Apprendre l'arabe Facilement @apprendrelarabefacilement · 26,286 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 September 2026
📜(( هَذِهِ عَقِيدَتُنَا ))📜 @aqedamenhag · 66,489 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 August 2026
موقع فضيلة الشيخ رسلان @rslancom · 29,859 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Les Assises Bénéfiques” (@LesAssisesBenefiques), 28,509 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LesAssisesBenefiques.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.