Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 50 days, net +760. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,934–22,939 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 11:01
22,823
+88
17 Sept 2026, 10:56
22,735
+10
15 Sept 2026, 08:01
22,725
+12
13 Sept 2026, 15:01
22,713
+16
11 Sept 2026, 20:41
22,697
+3
9 Sept 2026, 11:37
22,694
+6
6 Sept 2026, 04:41
22,688
+97
4 Sept 2026, 00:16
22,591
-8
2 Sept 2026, 11:53
22,599
-6
1 Sept 2026, 11:59
22,605
-9
31 Aug 2026, 14:26
22,614
+1
30 Aug 2026, 13:53
22,613
-6
29 Aug 2026, 15:03
22,619
+6
28 Aug 2026, 12:26
22,613
+6
27 Aug 2026, 12:59
22,607
+12
26 Aug 2026, 10:28
22,595
-1
25 Aug 2026, 12:02
22,596
+1
24 Aug 2026, 12:44
22,595
+20
22 Aug 2026, 19:43
22,575
+6
21 Aug 2026, 09:26
22,569
first reading
Engagement
68 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.3%
avg views ÷ 22,823 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,360
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 68 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held
68 (25 July 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total
56,586
Reactions total
1,452
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 14:31 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,160
Videos
≈841
Links
≈2,580
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 36s
Average length
48s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,098 reactions across 63 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,788
68.0%
👍
496
12.1%
💯
215
5.25%
😢
153
3.73%
🍓
90
2.20%
👌
69
1.68%
🥰
48
1.17%
🏆
46
1.12%
😭
37
0.903%
🤝
27
0.659%
🤩
27
0.659%
💔
25
0.61%
⚡
21
0.512%
🔥
21
0.512%
✍
16
0.39%
🤔
9
0.22%
😨
4
0.098%
😍
2
0.049%
🌭
1
0.024%
🎉
1
0.024%
2 further kinds
2
0.049%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 63 of the 68 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,098 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📚Ouverture des Inscriptions aux Niveaux de Lecture Maktaba du Savoir
Pendant 7 jours uniquement !
➡️https://www.maktabadusavoir.com
Si tu…
- Ne sais jamais par quel livre commencer
- Achètes des livres qui finissent par rester fermés
- Commences à lire avec motivation, puis abandonnes rapidement
- Ne sais pas dans quel ordre avancer
- As du mal à être régulier dans tes lectures
- Aimerais avoir un objectif clair pl…
Découvrez l’histoire de l’homme qui voulut écraser le cou du Prophète (paix sur lui) alors qu’il était en prosternation… et découvrez comment sa vie s’est terminée.
👉🏼 https://youtube.com/shorts/dmdcW6L8AhA?is=9tSgX6-0WlbTudVF
✅ Partage autorisé
❌ Modification interdite
➡️ Chaîne Telegram :
https://t.me/OmraDuSavoir
🎙️Vous avez manqué le live d’hier ?
Le replay du premier cours du séminaire consacré aux Règles du Commerce & du RIBA est désormais disponible.
L’occasion de découvrir un premier aperçu du séminaire avant de rejoindre la suite.
Si vous souhaitez assister à l’ensemble du programme, les inscriptions sont encore ouvertes.
👉🏼 https://www.institut-du-savoir.com/cours-du-moment#s-fiqu_commerce
✅ Partage autorisé
❌ Modi…
Le fils de Nûh fut appelé à monter dans l’arche pour être sauvé. Le fils d’Ibrâhîm fut confronté à une épreuve totalement différente.
Deux fils de prophètes, deux réponses opposées… et une leçon immense sur la soumission à Allah.
👉🏼 https://youtube.com/shorts/Tgry33iSjw4?is=tCOUlhdOCVc-iNIo
✅ Partage autorisé
❌ Modification interdite
➡️ Chaîne Telegram :
https://t.me/OmraDuSavoir
✍🏼 On espère vous retrouver nombreux pour ce premier cours, inshâ’Allah. À demain !
Ce sera aussi une belle occasion de découvrir le programme de l’intérieur et de voir concrètement ce qui vous attend.
📱 Le lien d’accès au live est disponibles ci-dessous :
🔵 Télégram :
https://t.me/OmraDuSavoir
Et si vous souhaitez vous inscrire pour le séminaire :
👉🏼 https://www.institut-du-savoir.com/cours-du-moment#s-fiqu_comm…
Il y a quelque chose d’assez particulier avec la science islamique : avant d’apprendre, on ne sait même pas tout ce qu’on ignore.
On peut passer des années à faire certaines choses d’une certaine manière, à acheter, vendre, travailler, signer des contrats… sans jamais s’être demandé si ce que l’on faisait était réellement correct.
Et puis un jour, on apprend.
Et là, on regarde certaines choses que l’on faisait ava…
Il y a des rappels qu’on devrait prendre le temps de lire… et surtout de méditer.
✅ Partage autorisé
❌ Modification interdite
➡️ Chaîne Telegram :
https://t.me/OmraDuSavoir
📖 La réponse pourrait en étonner certains : non, pas forcément.
Alors oui, l'exemple ici peut choquer car on parle d'une marge extrêmement importante.
Mais le but de cette question est justement de montrer une chose :
ce qui nous choque n’est pas forcément interdit… et ce qui nous paraît totalement normal peut parfois l’être.
Concernant la question, en Islam, il n'existe pas de pourcentage maximum fixé pour le bé…
🔥On connaît son nom. On connaît la sourate.
Mais derrière ces quelques versets se cache une histoire que beaucoup n’ont jamais vraiment entendue. Et une leçon qui nous concerne tous…
Découvrez l’histoire d’Abu Lahab :
👉🏼 https://youtube.com/shorts/v5oYGFjkBlg?is=mRNifC-eqW251l6j
✅ Partage autorisé
❌ Modification interdite
➡️ Chaîne Telegram :
https://t.me/OmraDuSavoir
🕋 À La Mecque, une prière est meilleure que 100 000 prières. Mais où s’arrête réellement cette récompense ?
Le Prophète (paix sur lui) a dit :
« Une prière dans Al-Masjid al-Haram est meilleure que cent mille prières ailleurs. »
Rapporté par Ibn Majah.
Mais une question se pose : que désigne exactement Al-Masjid al-Haram dans ce hadith ?
Est-ce uniquement l’enceinte de la Mosquée Sacrée autour de la Kaaba, ou bien…
❤56👍11💯8🏆3⚡1🔥1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @OmraDuSavoir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@OmraDuSavoir edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
2 September 2026
Most recent edit
2 September 2026
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Quand ça devient difficile et que toutes les portes semblent fermées, vous arrivez quand même à rester optimiste ?
Oui, al-hamdulillah45%
J’essaie, mais c’est difficile50%
Non, je deviens vite pessimiste8%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Quel événement poussa ‘Uthmân ibn ‘Affân (qu’Allah l’agrée) à faire établir des exemplaires de référence du Coran et à les envoyer dans différentes régions ?
La mort de nombreux mémorisateurs à Yamâmah59%
Des divergences de récitation constatées entre les musulmans33%
La conquête de l’Égypte1%
La découverte de manuscrits différents à Médine7%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Combien d'années Nuh (paix sur lui) a-t-il prêché son peuple ❓
900 ans25%
930 ans7%
950 ans64%
970 ans5%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 27 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Institut AL IHSAN @institutALihsan · 24,018 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 September 2026
𝐋𝐄𝐒 𝐂𝐋𝐄𝐅𝐒 𝐃𝐔 𝐁𝐈𝐄𝐍 @les_clefs_du_bien · 20,551 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 September 2026
Ceci est notre croyance @ceci_est_notre_croyance · 34,441 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 3 September 2026
Bilal Abou Hafsa @BilalAbouHafsa · 43,049 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 1 September 2026
Science profitable قناة العلم النافع @scienceprofitable · 35,155 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 2 September 2026
العلم الشرعي - La science légiférée @science_legiferee · 25,854 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 September 2026
Morjane Abu Dawud @morjaneabudawud · 36,899 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
Les Assises Bénéfiques @LesAssisesBenefiques · 26,715 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 September 2026
قناة كونـي سلفيّة على الجادة @kounisalafiya · 35,270 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
Apprendre l'arabe Facilement @apprendrelarabefacilement · 26,421 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 September 2026
Abdullah al Albani @AbdullahalAlbani · 26,570 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 September 2026
📚Dourous ahl as-Sunnah📚 دروس أهل السنة @yanisabouimran · 28,848 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Omra Du Savoir” (@OmraDuSavoir), 22,823 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/OmraDuSavoir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.