📽️ " Méfiez-vous de la plaisanterie et des blagues relatives aux actes d'adoration, de prières ou au jeûne. 📌 C'est une affaire grave dont le mal est dévastateur et celui qui s'y adonne court un immense danger. " Mais nous ne faisions que rire. " De quoi ris-tu ? Cela concerne Le Roi des Rois et tu Le défies ?! Où est donc ta crainte d'Allāh ﷻ ? Où est ta vénération pour Allāh ﷻ ? ⚠️ Plaisanter sur quoi que ce so…

Channel
Archives Vidéos rappels
@ArchivesVideosRappels
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
15,963subscribers
+72 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001170548804 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ArchivesVideosRappels |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ArchivesVideosRappels |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 13:40 | 15,963 | -9 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 02:01 | 15,972 | +5 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 15,967 | +4 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:58 | 15,963 | +9 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 21:39 | 15,954 | +5 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 12:01 | 15,949 | -10 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 03:01 | 15,959 | +5 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:40 | 15,954 | +10 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 16:24 | 15,944 | +2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:53 | 15,942 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:05 | 15,944 | +2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 15,942 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 17:55 | 15,945 | +3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 15,942 | +8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 15,934 | +4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 15,930 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 15,934 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 15,939 | +5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 15,934 | +6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 15,928 | first reading |
Engagement
65 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.88%
- avg views ÷ 15,963 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,420
- 19 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 19
- of 65 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 65 (26 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 26,947 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2h 32m
- Average length
- 2m 35s
Measured directly from 59 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Video, posted without a caption
Une recommandation essentielle de Cheikh à l'attention de chaque couple. 📽️ " Je recommande à chaque couple dans les choses de la dunya que chacun d'eux pardonne à l'autre. " 🎙️ Cheikh ar-Rouhayli حفظه الله تعالى t.me/ArchivesVideosRappels
📽️ " La gratitude est très importante. Pourquoi ? Quand iblis a menacé les serviteurs, qu'a t'il dit ? " Puis je les assaillerai par devant, par derrière, sur leur droite, sur leur gauche et tu ne trouveras pas la plupart d'entre-eux reconnaissants. " Pourquoi iblis a t'il insisté sur la gratitude ? Parce qu'il connaît la grandeur, le statut et la valeur de la gratitude auprès d'Allāh عزوجل. Ne néglige donc pas l…
🌧️ Question : « Quelle pluie permet de regrouper la prière ? » Très souvent les gens demandent : « Cette pluie permet-elle de regrouper les prières ou non ? » ➡️ Voici sa description, sachant qu’il convient de prendre en compte le statut juridique (religieux) selon votre localisation géographique. Voici les explications : 👆📽️ 🎙️ Cheikh 'abd As-Salām Ach-Chuway'ir حفظه الله تعالى t.me/ArchivesVideosRappels
📽️ " Les amis sont de 3 types : 👎 L'ami d'intérêt : Il reste ami avec toi tant qu'il tire profit de toi. 👎 L'ami du plaisir : Il ne t'accompagne que parce qu'il aime passer du temps avec toi, discuter, se divertir, veiller la nuit. Il ne t'apporte rien et tu ne tires rien de lui non plus. 💎 L'ami de vertu. Celui qui t'encourage à faire ce qui te valorise et t'empêche de commettre ce qui te déshonore. Il t'ouvre l…
📽️ " Le plaisir disparaît pour celui qui en a goûté l'essence dans l'illicite mais le déshonneur et la honte demeurent. Restent alors les mauvaises conséquences de son acte. Il n'y a aucun bien dans une jouissance dont l'après est le feu. 📌 Réfléchis à un plaisir qui s'achève rapidement mais qui laisse derrière lui des pertes, des douleurs et des malheurs dans cette vie d'ici-bas ainsi que des châtiments dans l'au-…
📽️ " Dans beaucoup de foyers, il y a des gens qui délaissent la prière comme s'ils n'avaient rien fait de grave. Et ils considèrent cela comme quelque chose de normal, d'ordinaire. Non, ce n'est pas normal. Délaisser la prière est contraire à la foi. Quelle est la valeur de l'être humain s'il ne prie pas ? Quelle est ta valeur dans la vie ? " 🎙️ Cheikh Farhan Al 'Anizi حفظه الله تعالى t.me/ArchivesVideosRappels
Video, posted without a caption
On y retrouve des images explicitement sexuelles, de la nudité et de la vulgarité qui contredisent directement le principe de la pudeur et l'obligation de préserver son regard. Préservez vos cœurs de tout ce qui pourrait les entacher. 🎙️ Cheikh 'Ali Ibn Zayd Al Madkhali حفظه الله تعالى t.me/ArchivesVideosRappels
La religion c'est le bon conseil. Dans ce rappel, Cheikh mettait en garde les parents contre les dangers de trois jeux populaires : Fortnite, PUBG et GTA. Selon lui, ces divertissements n'enseignaient rien d'autre que la criminalité reposant entièrement sur le meurtre, le vol de voitures et le pillage. Il expliquait que la pratique répétée de ces scénarios violents finissait par ancrer ces comportements comme une …
" Donnez-moi un peu de temps.." 📽️ " Peux-tu garantir que tu vivras jusqu'à demain ? Beaucoup de gens ont du bien en eux et disent in chaa Allāh je ferai ceci, je reviendrai dans le droit chemin et je serai plus assidu à la prière. Et la femme dit : " Donnez-moi un peu de temps, quelques jours pour porter le hijab." La mort ne prévient pas. La mort ne frappe pas à la porte. Elle n'envoie pas de message te disant q…
Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @ArchivesVideosRappels. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@LesAssisesBenefiques · 26,483
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 September 2026
@science_legiferee · 25,854
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 September 2026
@yanisabouimran · 28,848
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 September 2026
@scienceprofitable · 35,153
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 2 September 2026
@ceci_est_notre_croyance · 34,467
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 3 September 2026
@OmraDuSavoir · 22,735
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 September 2026
@BilalAbouHafsa · 43,049
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 1 September 2026
@morjaneabudawud · 36,915
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
@AbdullahalAlbani · 26,493
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 September 2026
@kounisalafiya · 35,311
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
@apprendrelarabefacilement · 26,421
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 September 2026
@MedOasis · 26,467
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 September 2026
@institutALihsan · 24,018
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 September 2026
@fatawe_22 · 31,560
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Archives Vidéos rappels” (@ArchivesVideosRappels), 15,963 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ArchivesVideosRappels.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.