Channel
@lascienceveridique
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
18,722subscribers
-126 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001120239984 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lascienceveridique |
| Created | 27 June 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lascienceveridique |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 21:22 | 18,722 | -7 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:46 | 18,729 | -6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:16 | 18,735 | -9 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 18,744 | -5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 18,749 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 18,750 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:33 | 18,757 | +2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 18,755 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:24 | 18,759 | -8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 18,767 | -6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:13 | 18,773 | -4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:44 | 18,777 | -9 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:06 | 18,786 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 04:11 | 18,785 | -7 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 06:38 | 18,792 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 07:28 | 18,793 | -7 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 18,800 | -10 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 18,810 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:39 | 18,814 | -8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 18,822 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (3 July 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,280 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 02:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
✒️ L’imam Muhammad ibn Nassir al Din al Albani رحمه الله : « L’imam même de dar al Hijra (l’imam Malik) dit d’un arabe clair et limpide : « Ce qui n’était pas une religion à l’époque du Prophète ﷺ , ne peut être de nos jours considérée comme une religion ». On constate que de nos jours la célébration du mawlid an nabawi est considéré comme une religion. Ce qui explique le désaccord existant entre les savants qui s’a…
✒️ Sheikh Salih Al-Fawzan حفظه الله : « Les premiers à avoir intié le Mawlid sont les Chiites Fatimides, puis les ont suivi ceux qui ont été trompés parmi Ahlu As-Sounnah en raison de leur bonne intention et volonté. Ils pensent que cela fait partie de l’amour du Messager alors que ce n’est pas le cas ; l’amour (du Messager) se concrétise par le suivi et non par l'innovation. » [الْعَقِيدَةُ الطَّحَاوِيَّةُ (ص ١٧٦…
https://youtube.com/shorts/bPe8IhAaV3I?si=BUuvAu8wxcI-m0Da
✒️ L’imam ibn Baz رحمه الله : « Le doué de raison ne doit pas se laisser tromper par le nombre important d’individus aux quatre coins du monde qui célèbrent le mawlid an nabawi (la naissance du Prophèteﷺ) car le vrai ne dépend pas du grand nombre. » 📚 رسائل في حكم الاحتفال بالمولد النبوي ٦١ Traduction : Na’ima Umm Talhah 🚫modification interdite🚫 https://t.me/lascienceveridique
✒️ Cheikh Salih al Fawzan حفظه الله : « Il y a des gens que le Chaytan détourne de la parole : La ilaha illa Allah (nulle divinité n’est digne d’adoration si ce n’est Allah). Ne la prononce alors que très peu de personnes, et rares sont ceux qui mentionnent Allah par le biais de cette parole et rares sont ceux qui la mentionnent de manière répétitive en dépit du fait qu’elle pèse lourd dans la balance. Il s’agit d’u…
🖋️ Cheikh Abd Allah an Najmi : « Si l'homme n'accepte pas la vérité, Allah l'éprouve par le faux. Et s'il n'accepte pas la guidée, Allah l'éprouve par l'égarement. » [شرح مقدِّمة أبي زيد القيرواني رحمه الله للشَّيخ عبد الله النجمي حفظه الله] ✍️Traduction : Na’ima Umm Talhah 🚫modification interdite🚫 https://t.me/lascienceveridique
🖋️ Cheikh Muhammad ibn Hadi al Madkhali : « Le Messager d’Allah a commencé son appel à Allah par l'appel au Tawhid, et ceci est le fondement de son appel ainsi que de l'appel de tous les prophètes avant lui. Tout appel qui ne repose pas sur ce fondement est un appel voué à l'échec et s'écarte de la méthodologie du Prophète et de l'ensemble des Prophètes. » [محاضرة لزوم هدي النبي ﷺ في الدعوة إلى الله تعالى للشَّيخ …
🖋️ Cheikh Ahmad an Najmi : « Le Chirk est une impureté pour les cœurs, il les souille et annule l'ensemble des adorations, qu'elles proviennent du cœur, de la langue ou des membres. C'est pourquoi Allah dit à Son Prophète ﷺ : {Et tes vêtements, purifie-les. Et de l'abomination, éloigne-toi.} [al Muzzammil, v. 4-5]. De là, nous savons que le polythéiste, peu importe les adorations par lesquelles il cherche à se ra…
🖋️ Cheikh al Islam ibn Taymiyyah : « La meilleure des œuvres après les obligations religieuses varie d’un individu à un autre, selon ce dont ils sont capables et ce qui convient à leur temps. Il est impossible d'en donner une réponse globale et détaillée valable pour tout le monde. Cependant, il y a une sorte de consensus parmi les savants qui connaissent Allah et Ses commandements : la constance dans la mention d'…
🖋️ Cheikh Salih al Ouseymi : « Sachez une chose importante : chaque science transmet des moeurs à celui qui l'étudie. Si l'étudiant n'y prend pas garde, cela peut mal tourner pour lui. Si on regarde de plus près, on remarque que : Celui qui n’étudie que du Fiqh devient rigide. Celui qui n’étudie que du Hadith devient lourd d'esprit dans sa compréhension. Celui qui n’étudie que les Qira-at devient orgueilleux. Celui …
🖋️ L’imam Ibn Kathir a dit : « Qu'aucun serviteur ne désespère de la miséricorde d'Allah, même si ses péchés sont grands et nombreux ; car la porte du repentir et de la miséricorde est immense. Allah le Très-Haut dit : {Ne savent-ils pas que c'est Allah qui agrée le repentir de Ses serviteurs} [At-Tawbah : 104] ». 📓تفسير ابن كثير 📖م٧ / صفحة ١٠٧ ✍️Traduction : Na’ima Umm Talhah 🚫modification interdite🚫 https://t.me…
🖋️ Cheikh Ibn Utheymin a dit : « Prends conscience– ô croyant – de la valeur des bienfaits d'Allah sur toi à travers deux formes de bienfaisance : 👉 Une bienfaisance préalable qui est la guidée : Allah t'a guidé et t'a accordé la réussite. 👉 Une bienfaisance ultérieure qui est la immense récompense. En réalité, nous sommes bien souvent insouciants ; l'être humain compte fréquemment sur lui-même lorsqu'il fait le …
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @lascienceveridique. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“La Science Véridique” (@lascienceveridique), 18,722 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lascienceveridique.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.