Channel
@parolesprecieuses
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,682subscribers
-104 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001237838071 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @parolesprecieuses |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/parolesprecieuses |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 10:15 | 11,682 | -11 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 23:21 | 11,693 | -3 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:39 | 11,696 | -6 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:19 | 11,702 | -8 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 08:18 | 11,710 | -4 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 11:18 | 11,714 | -5 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 04:55 | 11,719 | +3 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 11:41 | 11,716 | -4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:48 | 11,720 | -5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:45 | 11,725 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:58 | 11,729 | -5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 11,734 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 11,740 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:28 | 11,741 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:59 | 11,743 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 13:57 | 11,746 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:19 | 11,749 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:32 | 11,747 | -7 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 11,754 | -5 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:23 | 11,759 | first reading |
37 posts held, back to 22 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 37 (22 June 2026 – 31 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,274 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 00:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
🔴 QUESTION: Est-il permis à un muslim de travailler pour un juif ou un chrétien? 🟢 RÉPONSE DE SHAYKH AL ALBÂNÎ رحمه الله تعالى: Il est permis à un muslim de travailler pour un chrétien et pour un juif si son travail est permis par la Sharî'ah (législation islamique). Mais si son travail est contraire à sa religion, il lui est obligatoire de démissionner au premier moment venu❗️ En ce qui concerne la licéité de tra…
⚔️📜 La vérité isolée : l’étrangeté des gens de la Sunnah 💎Shaykh Al-Albânî رحمه الله a dit: "⚡️Si tu parles du Tawhîd, les gens du shirk (polythéisme) te rejetteront. ⚡️Si tu parles de la Sunnah, les gens de la bid‘a (innovation) te rejetteront. ⚡️Si tu parles de la preuve et de l’argument, les fanatiques des madhâhib (écoles juridiques), les soufis et les ignorants te rejetteront. ⚡️Si tu parles de l’obéissance aux…
🔑 COMPRENDRE LE TAWAKKUL 🕋 Le Grand Muftî du Royaume d'Arabie saoudite, shaykh Sâlih al-Fawzân حفظه الله a dit: "Il nous incombe de placer notre confiance en Allah سبحانه dans toutes les affaires, et non dans certaines situations seulement. Placer sa confiance en Allah ne signifie pas délaisser les causes, car Allah a certes ordonné de placer sa confiance en Lui, tout comme Il a ordonné de prendre les causes. Allah…
🕋 Le vrai souvenir du Prophète ﷺ : au-delà du mawlid ‼️Shaykh al ’Uthaymîn رحمه الله dit: "Plus l’être humain aime le Messager d’Allah ﷺ, plus il s’éloigne des innovations. Car si quelqu’un entreprend ceci (le Mawlid) et dit : « Je cherche par cet acte à me rapprocher d’Allah تعالى », nous lui dirons : « Tu as introduit dans la religion d’Allah ce qui n’en fait pas partie, et tu as devancé Allah et Son Messager ﷺ. …
⚡️Le poison du Mawlid : entre bid‘a, immoralité et shirk akbar ⚠️Shaykh Ibn Bâz رحمه الله a dit: "Puis, la plupart de ces célébrations des Mawlid, en plus d’être une innovation, ne sont pas exemptes d’inclure d’autres choses blâmables, comme la mixité entre les hommes et les femmes, l’usage de chants et d’instruments de musique, la consommation de boissons enivrantes et des substances stupéfiantes, et d’autres maux …
❌Le véritable amour du Prophète ﷺ n’est pas dans le Mawlid 💢Shaykh Sâlih Al Fawzân qu'Allah ﷻ le préserve a dit: "Certains prétendent fêter le mawlid an-nabawî (la naissance du Prophète ﷺ) par amour pour le Messager ﷺ. On dit à ces gens-là : êtes-vous plus ardents dans l’amour du Messager qu’Abû Bakr, ‘Umar et le reste des sahâbah, les Tâbi‘ûn et les meilleures générations ⁉️ Tous ceux-là n’ont jamais fêté ce mawl…
📜LE VRAI VISAGE DU MAWLID... ⚠️L’imâm Muqbil al-Wâdi‘î qu'Allah ﷻ lui fasse miséricorde a dit : "Le Mawlid an-Nabawî est considéré comme une innovation sur laquelle Allah n’a révélé aucune preuve. Il n’existait ni à l’époque du Prophète ﷺ, ni à l’époque d’Abû Bakr, ni à l’époque de ‘Umar, ni à l’époque de ‘Uthmân, et ainsi de suite. Ce sont uniquement les ‘Ubaydiyyûn¹ (Fatimides) qui l’ont instauré, or ils sont con…
📜TROIS SIÈCLES SANS MAWLID : L’HISTOIRE OUBLIÉE ✒️Shaykh Bakr Abû Zayd qu'Allah ﷻ lui fasse miséricorde a dit: "L’origine de l’innovation des fêtes dans l’Islâm remonte aux chiites fatimides en Égypte, depuis l’établissement de leur État par al-Mu‘izz al-Fâtimî. Ainsi, la première fête innovée dans l’Islâm par les Fatimides en Égypte, en l’an 363 H, fut « la fête de la naissance (ʿîd al-mîlâd) », c’est-à-dire la nai…
🕯Al ‘Alâmah Hamûd At-Tuwayjiry qu'Allah lui fasse miséricorde a dit: "Ceux qui prennent le Mawlid comme une fête ne font pas partie de ceux dont on espère la récompense pour cette innovation, mais ils font plutôt partie de ceux dont on craint le châtiment à cause de leur opposition à ce sur quoi étaient le Messager d’Allah ﷺ et ses compagnons." ┈┉┅━━┅┉┈ 🕯قال العلامة حمود التويجري رحمه الله: "فالذين يتخذون المولد عيدا…
📛Le danger de délaisser les obligations pour défendre les innovations du mawlid 🚨Shaykh Ibn Bâz رحمه الله a dit: "Parmi les choses étonnantes et étranges, il y a que beaucoup de gens s’activent et s’efforcent pour participer à ces célébrations innovées (du mawlid) et les défendent, mais délaissent ce qu’Allah leur a rendu obligatoire comme la présence au Jumu‘a (prière du vendredi) et aux prières en groupe (à la mos…
🔥Toute innovation est un égarement — rappel sur le Mawlid 🪶L’imâm Ash-Shawkânî رحمه الله a dit: "Concernant le Mawlid, je n’ai jusqu’à présent trouvé aucune preuve attestant sa légitimité, ni dans le Livre (d'Allah), ni dans la Sunnah, ni dans le consensus (ijmâʿ), ni dans le qiyâs (analogie), ni dans aucune forme de déduction. Bien au contraire, les musulmùn sont unanimes sur le fait qu’il n’existait pas à l’époqu…
➡️⬅️ LA SUNNAH & LE MAWLID : deux voies opposées 💥Shaykh ʿAbdel ʿAzîz Ar-Râjihî qu'Allah ﷻ le preserve a dit: "Chaque fois qu’une innovation se manifeste, la sunnah qui s’y oppose disparaît ; et chaque fois qu’une sunnah se manifeste, l’innovation qui s’y oppose disparaît. Car la sunnah s’oppose à l’innovation, et l’innovation s’oppose à la sunnah. Par exemple, l’innovation de la célébration de la naissance du prop…
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @parolesprecieuses. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Paroles Précieuses •فوائد•” (@parolesprecieuses), 11,682 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/parolesprecieuses.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.