Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Бэклог | Подкаст об играх

Channel

Бэклог | Подкаст об играх

@backlogpodcastg

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

99subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001777623641
TypeChannel
Username@backlogpodcastg
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/backlogpodcastg

Growth

9399968 August 2026 — 93 subscribers9 August 2026 — 93 subscribers24 August 2026 — 94 subscribers7 September 2026 — 95 subscribers14 September 2026 — 99 subscribers8 August 202614 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 37 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 92–100 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 12:0199+4
7 Sept 2026, 11:5795+1
24 Aug 2026, 07:4794+1
9 Aug 2026, 13:1693no change
8 Aug 2026, 02:1593first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 3 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

161 reactions across 17 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4024.8%
🔥1811.2%
❤‍🔥148.70%
😁138.07%
💯127.45%
👌95.59%
👀84.97%
🥰84.97%
👍74.35%
😢53.11%
🤯53.11%
🆒42.48%
👏42.48%
🫡31.86%
21.24%
😍21.24%
🤔21.24%
🤡21.24%
custom 543169006086705938710.621%
👾10.621%
1 further kind10.621%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 161 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC31 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Стоило попробовать в Game Pass и забайтился. А вы говорите, что у XBOX модель распространения плохая 😁

😁21👀1

Signed Artem Nagorny

5 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTC42 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

😱 Онлайн в играх про Человека-паука в Steam показал значительный рост на фоне выхода «Нового дня» Например, число пользователей в Marvel’s Spider-Man 2 увеличилось на 500%. На хайпе тайтлы залетели в чарт платформы. Вот бы и прослушивания нашего выпуска про Паучка возросло...

2🔥2🥰2👏1

Signed Artem Nagorny

4 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC48 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ESRB опубликовала описание возрастного рейтинга Marvel's Wolverine — в игре есть «несколько сцен с обнаженными ягодицами» 👀 Это мы играем, даже не нужно уточнять «чьих»

😁5💯2🤯2custom 54316900608670593871

Signed Artem Nagorny

31 Jul 2026, 07:58 UTC77 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

📅 Календарь августовских релизов Resonance: A Plague Tale Legacy и Star Wars Zero Company сюююда!

3👌2💯2

Signed Artem Nagorny

29 Jul 2026, 06:53 UTC104 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🚶‍♂️ Не время умирать! 007 First Light и Directive 8020 в 113-м подкасте «Бэклог» Выполняем обещания. Наконец добрались до шикарной игры про Джеймса Бонда и новой главы The Dark Pictures Anthology. Приятного прослушивания! А в послесловии на boosty говорим про «Оно приходит за тобой», «Живая ярость» и «Четыре комнаты»

❤‍🔥6🔥4👏3

Signed Artem Nagorny

27 Jul 2026, 06:43 UTC75 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

😎 113! 007 First Light и Directive 8020 Ругаем Supermassive Games, удивляемся IO Interactive. А еще обсуждаем совершенно рандомные фильмы в послесловии. Все как всегда, но чуть-чуть круче!

6💯4👀3

Signed Artem Nagorny

24 Jul 2026, 08:22 UTC85 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

😢 Геймдизайнер хоррор-шутера Crisol: Theater of Idols рассказал, что студию авторов закрыли Совсем недавно обсуждали проект в 108-м выпуске. Нормальный RE-лайк шутер с крутой идеей патрон из крови. Да, маловато разнообразия, местами было видно, что авторам не хватило опыта\бюджета. И еще в подкасте мы сказали, что сиквел от этих же ребят был бы уже не просто нормальной, а прямо отличной игрой. Но, видимо, нет. Жаль

😢5🤔2🤡2👀1

Signed Artem Nagorny

23 Jul 2026, 08:54 UTC79 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

В этом заголовке прекрасно все

3👌2🫡2🤪1

Signed Artem Nagorny

22 Jul 2026, 10:55 UTC77 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

👀 В ожидании нового выпуска (который мы уже записали) рекомендуем переслушать топовые подкасты по статистике: Топ-3 Яндекс.Музыки: ▫️#19. Far Cry 5 и Immortals Fenyx Rising ▫️#21. Biomutant, Miles Morales и Little Nightmares 2 ▫️#57. Resident Evil 4 Remake и немного VR Топ-3 Podster: ▫️#80. Игры, которые мы опять не смогли пройти ▫️#82. Quantum Break, We Happy Few и Open Roads ▫️#53. Mass Effect: Legendary Editio

3👌3🔥3🫡1

Signed Artem Nagorny

21 Jul 2026, 08:40 UTC60 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

2😁2💯1🤯1

Signed Artem Nagorny

20 Jul 2026, 09:25 UTC64 viewsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Какую из пропущенных игр нам стоит наверстать?

  1. Baldur's Gate III61%
  2. Assassin's Creed IV Black Flag17%
  3. Dying Light: The Beast17%
  4. Pragmata26%
  5. Zero Parades: For Dead Spies22%
  6. Tainted Grail: The Fall of Avalon30%
  7. Свой вариант в комментариях4%

The shares total 177%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Signed Artem Nagorny

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @backlogpodcastg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Jul 2026, 09:25 UTCAnonymous Poll23 voters

Какую из пропущенных игр нам стоит наверстать?

  1. Baldur's Gate III61%
  2. Assassin's Creed IV Black Flag17%
  3. Dying Light: The Beast17%
  4. Pragmata26%
  5. Zero Parades: For Dead Spies22%
  6. Tainted Grail: The Fall of Avalon30%
  7. Свой вариант в комментариях4%

The shares total 177%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Бэклог | Подкаст об играх” (@backlogpodcastg), 99 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/backlogpodcastg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.