Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 13 причин посмотреть🎙️

Channel

13 причин посмотреть🎙️

@thirteenreasonstowatch

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

169subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002246755888
TypeChannel
Username@thirteenreasonstowatch
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/thirteenreasonstowatch

Growth

169170169.56 August 2026 — 170 subscribers8 August 2026 — 170 subscribers4 September 2026 — 169 subscribers6 August 20264 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 29 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 169–170 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 05:01169-1
8 Aug 2026, 15:01170no change
6 Aug 2026, 07:21170first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

70 reactions across 7 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2130.0%
🔥1521.4%
💘1420.0%
👏710.0%
🤩68.57%
🆒34.29%
🥰22.86%
💯11.43%
😍11.43%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 03:36 UTC54 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Забавно, что моей мечтой была Марго Робби в роли Эммы Фрост, а в итоге утвердили Самару Уивинг, которую часто называют клоном Марго, что ж, кастинг удачный! 🥰

🔥3👏2🥰2💯1

19 Jul 2026, 10:46 UTC130 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Лучшие выпуск подкаста в завершенном сезоне? 💘

  1. «Грозовой перевал» ft. Лика Родина22%
  2. «Красота» ft. Zeé9%
  3. «Оскар-2026» ft. Гульжан Токтогул9%
  4. «Вот это драма!» ft. Katya Golvin35%
  5. «Грызня» 2 сезон ft. Саида Нуралиева17%
  6. Эпоха Disney Channel ft. Infinite Obsession30%
  7. «Дьявол носит Prada 2» ft. Мария Кордюкова17%
  8. «Эйфория» 3 сезон ft. Саманта Мясник43%
  9. «Получеловек» ft. Иван Филиппов22%
  10. «Новый Человек-паук» ft. Иван Чернявский26%

The shares total 230%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🔥3💘2

19 Jul 2026, 10:41 UTC90 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Хотим напомнить вам, что мы уходим в отпуск до сентября, поэтому новых выпусков пару месяцев не будет, но будем обитать здесь, а всё, что мы смотрим, вы можете отслеживать в наших LetterBoxd аккаунтах: 🔗 LB Алёны 🔗 LB Артура А пока просим проголосовать в нашем традиционном опросе за лучший/любимый выпуск подкаста в завершённом сезоне (можно выбирать несколько вариантов) 👇

🆒32💘1

16 Jul 2026, 16:04 UTC93 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ура! Наша коллаборация на главной странице Яндекс Музыки. Спасибо редакции, что подсветили наш плейлист 🕷️ Спасибо также Mave.stream за отдельно выделенное место для Подкастозавров! Спасибо Podcasts.ru за поддержку и анонс! Спасибо Comics Fans Community, что рассказали о нас сообществу! А если вы ещё не начали погружение в мир Человека-паука, то время пришло 🕸️

8👏5💘5🔥1

13 Jul 2026, 12:18 UTC126 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Наш эпизод — часть крупнейшей коллаборации Подкастозавров, посвященной Человеку-пауку, в которой каждый из подкастов-участников обсудил отдельную адаптацию (включая комиксы и игры) 🦖 Это не последняя наша коллаборация, подписывайтесь на плейлист и папку с ТГ-каналами 💌 Разборы остальных адаптаций «Человека-паука» от других подкастозавров: Плейлист на Яндекс Музыке 🕷️ Комиксы про Человека-паука 🕷️ Человек-паук (1

5💘3🔥3

13 Jul 2026, 02:22 UTC727 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Почему Человек-паук Эндрю Гарфилда самый человечный герой? Как Марк Уэбб построил самые искренние романтические отношения среди всех версий паучка? И что стало причиной того, что «Новый Человек-паук» не получил красивой финальной точки? 🕷️ В новом выпуске подкаста Артур и Алёна обсуждают The Amazing Spider-Man вместе со специалистом по комиксам, и ведущим подкаста «Через вселенные» — Иваном Чернявским 🦸 Наш подкаст

6🔥4💘3

9 Jul 2026, 20:08 UTC117 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

«13 причин посмотреть» собрали для вас ещё 13 подкастов, которые присоединились к самой большой коллаборации «Подкастозавров», которая посвящена неповторимому Человеку-пауку! 🕷️ Уже совсем скоро, вы сможете послушать подкаст о своей любимой версии паучка, либо же окунуться в плэйлист с 14 выпусками, каждый из которых будет посвящён разным проектам о Питере Паркере (и не только) на любой вкус! 🎧 Наш эпизод будет пос

🤩6🔥1😍1

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @thirteenreasonstowatch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Jul 2026, 10:46 UTCAnonymous Poll23 voters

Лучшие выпуск подкаста в завершенном сезоне? 💘

  1. «Грозовой перевал» ft. Лика Родина22%
  2. «Красота» ft. Zeé9%
  3. «Оскар-2026» ft. Гульжан Токтогул9%
  4. «Вот это драма!» ft. Katya Golvin35%
  5. «Грызня» 2 сезон ft. Саида Нуралиева17%
  6. Эпоха Disney Channel ft. Infinite Obsession30%
  7. «Дьявол носит Prada 2» ft. Мария Кордюкова17%
  8. «Эйфория» 3 сезон ft. Саманта Мясник43%
  9. «Получеловек» ft. Иван Филиппов22%
  10. «Новый Человек-паук» ft. Иван Чернявский26%

The shares total 230%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“13 причин посмотреть🎙️” (@thirteenreasonstowatch), 169 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thirteenreasonstowatch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.