Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Banger Call 💥

Channel

Banger Call 💥

@bangercall

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

15,945subscribers

+9,620 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002032394514
TypeChannel
Username@bangercall
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 October 2026
Measurements held43
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/bangercall

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5,96225,57315,767.57 August 2026 — 6,325 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,325 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,269 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,962 subscribers13 August 2026 — 25,573 subscribers15 August 2026 — 25,352 subscribers16 August 2026 — 25,066 subscribers17 August 2026 — 24,923 subscribers18 August 2026 — 24,836 subscribers20 August 2026 — 24,700 subscribers21 August 2026 — 24,577 subscribers22 August 2026 — 24,452 subscribers24 August 2026 — 24,286 subscribers25 August 2026 — 24,170 subscribers26 August 2026 — 24,054 subscribers27 August 2026 — 23,944 subscribers28 August 2026 — 23,923 subscribers29 August 2026 — 23,831 subscribers30 August 2026 — 23,731 subscribers30 August 2026 — 23,654 subscribers31 August 2026 — 23,574 subscribers2 September 2026 — 23,512 subscribers3 September 2026 — 23,403 subscribers4 September 2026 — 23,263 subscribers7 September 2026 — 23,044 subscribers10 September 2026 — 22,785 subscribers12 September 2026 — 22,621 subscribers14 September 2026 — 21,930 subscribers16 September 2026 — 21,668 subscribers18 September 2026 — 21,346 subscribers2 October 2026 — 18,845 subscribers7 October 2026 — 17,622 subscribers11 October 2026 — 17,200 subscribers14 October 2026 — 16,942 subscribers15 October 2026 — 16,810 subscribers16 October 2026 — 16,680 subscribers17 October 2026 — 16,575 subscribers18 October 2026 — 16,527 subscribers19 October 2026 — 16,453 subscribers20 October 2026 — 16,332 subscribers21 October 2026 — 16,255 subscribers22 October 2026 — 16,078 subscribers23 October 2026 — 15,945 subscribers15,9457 August 202623 October 2026
43 measurements spanning 77 days, net +9,620. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,020–28,515 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 43
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Oct 2026, 06:3515,945-133
22 Oct 2026, 09:1516,078-177
21 Oct 2026, 04:3616,255-77
20 Oct 2026, 05:3716,332-121
19 Oct 2026, 07:3616,453-74
18 Oct 2026, 06:0116,527-48
17 Oct 2026, 09:0916,575-105
16 Oct 2026, 09:5416,680-130
15 Oct 2026, 06:4916,810-132
14 Oct 2026, 01:2716,942-258
11 Oct 2026, 10:3917,200-422
7 Oct 2026, 02:4217,622-1,223
2 Oct 2026, 05:5518,845-2,501
18 Sept 2026, 16:3621,346-322
16 Sept 2026, 05:0021,668-262
14 Sept 2026, 11:4021,930-691
12 Sept 2026, 19:3622,621-164
10 Sept 2026, 17:0022,785-259
7 Sept 2026, 12:1623,044-219
4 Sept 2026, 16:3923,263first reading

Engagement

194 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.398%
avg views ÷ 15,945 subscribers
Avg views / post
63.5
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 194 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026
Posts held194 (5 August 2026 – 30 September 2026)
Views total1,016
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Sept 2026, 16:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
29s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

74 reactions across 37 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4864.9%
🔥1824.3%
👍45.41%
😁22.70%
🙈22.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 194 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 194 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Sept 2026, 15:47 UTC26 viewsread 30 September 2026

alpha lounge for those interested. free to join for good trenchers https://t.me/+O2LmIOE_Px4wNTMx

30 Sept 2026, 15:40 UTC30 views1 reactionsread 30 September 2026
Photo

$SBTC 205k clean 10x I can see this going much higher. Not even a creator interaction of what's going on. Narrative is just that good https://dexscreener.com/solana/23ka67yhjewingv731cgpxdxkgyflye948fksehmudx5

🔥1

30 Sept 2026, 15:32 UTC23 viewsread 30 September 2026
Video

Achievement Unlocked: x4! 🖖 @bangercall made a x4+ call on Shielded Bitcoi.... $21K ➡️ $87K 👁 View Call 📊 View Stats 🔊Ad - Byte Elon Musk's Ai Memory Dog

30 Sept 2026, 15:09 UTC23 viewsread 30 September 2026
Photo

🐦 BeeRyan ↣ by @FOLKARNOLD (66)   ↳ \ I JUST FOUND THIS GUY'S GITHUB he is trying to vamp ZEC by building privacy protocol on BTC? @nemothenoone https://github.com/nemothenoone https://github.com/TABConf/8.tabconf.com/issues/67 ╭─ 🔗 Quoting @nemothenoone (1.9K) 📸 Bitcoin PIPEs: Covenants and ZKPs on the Bitcoin L1 without Soft Fork. https://www.allocin.it/uploads/placeholder-bitcoin.pdf 🔁 1 ❤️ 1 👀 49 ⌚ 44m ago …

30 Sept 2026, 15:09 UTC22 viewsread 30 September 2026

$sBTC aped here a guy on github is trying to camp zec with a forked version of btc doing the same thing. fees going to github 20k entry ca: 23Ka67YHjEwinGV731cGPXdxKGyfLYe948FksehmUdX5

29 Sept 2026, 18:05 UTC48 viewsread 30 September 2026
Photo

This actually looks insane check the web out and connect your agents if you have them https://elizasociety.com/world.html?follow=liza

29 Sept 2026, 17:34 UTC51 viewsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Eliza Society $LIZA was looking for another good dip entry to call. Bring your a.i agents to town and watch them trade, socialize, buy cosmetics, etc. Full breakdown on the X account ca: 7UfcTJD2RSRg9AJ4k2V2rs71Ew8Zy2avaU5roc8bpump https://dexscreener.com/solana/fztcx2njqkfaedqceyd5t1pnt5ssjujr1e7lpzpeefko https://x.com/Eliza_Society/status/2104833630157885764?s=20

28 Sept 2026, 19:19 UTC62 viewsread 30 September 2026

Brain.Site aped here. Agents compete against each other as devs. They launch their own coins you can track their progress. X accounts coming for agents to document their results and journal thoughts. Really cool idea let's see how this plays out. 25k entry ca: braiZ1pbCMTvXJ2edndcDsE6dogezr7jihPSrwKH1yy

28 Sept 2026, 18:55 UTC57 viewsread 30 September 2026

Bought some interesting tech here on Robinhood. You can give your NFT's their own voice. 20k seems like a steal it's a first mover nothing I've seen like it exists anywhere NFS gives NFTs a voice. 🔊 Sound is generated from on-chain traits — not attached as an MP3. Every NFT gets unique, reproducible & verifiable Sound DNA. ca: 0x39f59262a6f82bb1e0ae30a2ae2fab2a66accd44

27 Sept 2026, 15:52 UTC81 viewsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Stonks pools send it already 2x E8uHgDvjcWiQtSZ3roisMm41eamAP8vdv4jirjY7pump

27 Sept 2026, 15:34 UTC77 viewsread 30 September 2026
Video

Create a stock-paired pool for any already existing token onchain, pair your memecoins with any stock of your choosing. E8uHgDvjcWiQtSZ3roisMm41eamAP8vdv4jirjY7pump

Showing the 12 most recent of 194 posts we hold for @bangercall. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Banger Call 💥” (@bangercall), 15,945 subscribers as measured 23 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bangercall.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.