Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 91 days, net +1,130. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,953–17,452 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 06:47
17,256
-23
5 Nov 2026, 03:37
17,279
+14
4 Nov 2026, 04:17
17,265
+65
3 Nov 2026, 06:11
17,200
+3
2 Nov 2026, 05:37
17,197
+14
1 Nov 2026, 03:36
17,183
+27
31 Oct 2026, 04:19
17,156
-11
30 Oct 2026, 06:36
17,167
-11
29 Oct 2026, 08:50
17,178
+3
28 Oct 2026, 09:48
17,175
+13
27 Oct 2026, 12:00
17,162
+62
26 Oct 2026, 13:18
17,100
-2
25 Oct 2026, 16:36
17,102
+16
24 Oct 2026, 16:55
17,086
-5
23 Oct 2026, 19:01
17,091
+16
22 Oct 2026, 21:28
17,075
+34
21 Oct 2026, 19:48
17,041
+83
20 Oct 2026, 18:05
16,958
+7
19 Oct 2026, 16:06
16,951
-9
18 Oct 2026, 18:51
16,960
first reading
Engagement
517 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.1%
avg views ÷ 17,256 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,820
82 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
82
of 517 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
517 (6 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
312,990
Reactions total
15,521
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 04:10 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 31s
Average length
18s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
71,678 reactions across 516 posts, in 45 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
50,458
70.4%
👍
3,886
5.42%
🔥
2,512
3.50%
👎
2,414
3.37%
❤🔥
2,096
2.92%
😁
1,506
2.10%
😢
1,412
1.97%
🤣
1,056
1.47%
🆒
888
1.24%
😭
783
1.09%
custom 5251322471184867068
695
0.97%
🙏
623
0.869%
custom 5375209819290476060
466
0.65%
👏
342
0.477%
🤔
247
0.345%
🤯
221
0.308%
💔
216
0.301%
💯
194
0.271%
🥰
184
0.257%
💘
173
0.241%
25 further kinds
1,306
1.82%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 517 of the 517 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71,678 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 517 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
56
across the posts below
Posts paid on
23
of 517 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bayernstyle. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 517 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 82 posts held from the last 30 days (7.32%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🎙 Ули Хёнесс о победе «Баварии» над «Атлетико Мадрид»:
«У меня были ужасные опасения заранее. Против «Атлетико» всегда тяжело; я знаю, как жёстко они могут играть. Поэтому я очень нервничал, сидя перед телевизором перед матчем.
Я абсолютно в восторге от игры нашей команды в Мадриде. Особенно во втором тайме мы полностью переиграли «Атлетико» на их собственном стадионе. Я не видел такой фантастической игры на выезде…
📰 Главный скаут «Манчестер Юнайтед» Кристофер Вивелл считался главным кандидатом на смену Шмадтке в «Баварии».
Но эта возможность теперь остыла. Кристоф Фройнд получил задание найти преемника Шмадтке. Он очень хорошо знает Вивелла по их совместной работе в «Зальцбурге», и у двоих крепкие личные и профессиональные отношения.
Однако Макс Эберль, который технически стоит выше Фройнда в иерархии клуба, не убеждён в иде…
📰 Работы по укладке поля на «Альянц-Арене» в самом разгаре в преддверии Мюнхенской игры НФЛ 15 ноября.
После расширения газона на следующей неделе будут установлены штанги для филд-голов и искусственный газон для зачётных зон.
@bayernstyle
📰 «Тоттенхэм» сохранил за собой право преимущественного выкупа Харри Кейна, несмотря на то что капитан сборной Англии подписал новый контракт с «Баварией».
Это соглашение остается в силе между «Шпорами» и «Баварией» и существует отдельно от нового контракта Кейна. Оно будет применяться только в том случае, если «Бавария» согласится продать Кейна в будущем и форвард захочет вернуться в «Тоттенхэм».
«Бавария» закрепи…
📰 Оскар Петушевски (18 лет) высоко в списке «Баварии» на следующее лето.
Он один из конкретных кандидатов на позицию левого вингера. Макс Эберль — большой поклонник левого вингера. Отступные: €60 млн.
ℹ️ Florian Plettenberg
@bayernstyle
📰 Харри Кейн теперь самый высокооплачиваемый игрок «Баварии», обогнав Джамала Мусиалу.
Теперь он зарабатывает более 30 миллионов евро брутто в год, включая бонусы (бонусы, связанные с победами в национальных титулах, успехами в Лиге чемпионов, ещё одним «Золотым мячом», голами и результативными передачами). Отступные отсутствуют.
ℹ️ Florian Plettenberg
@bayernstyle
📰 Левый вингер «Порту» Оскар Петушевский (18 лет) — одно из имён на позиции, высоко стоящее в списке «Баварии».
Этот польский игрок высоко оценён скаутами клуба и в настоящее время внимательно отслеживается.
ℹ️ Bild
@bayernstyle
📰 Хотя «Бавария» довольна текущей ситуацией на позиции центральных защитников, она изучает рынок в этой позиции с прицелом на будущее.
Томас Араужу (24 года) из «Бенфики» — конкретное имя в списке «Баварии» на случай, если один из нынешних центральных защитников уйдёт. Несколько других имён также просматриваются.
ℹ️ Bild
@bayernstyle
📷 Джамал Мусиала сегодня вернулся к тренировкам с командой впервые за пять с половиной недель, сделав важный шаг к своему возвращению.
ℹ️ Bild
@bayernstyle
📰 Макс Эберль является поклонником Антонио Нуса и очень убеждён в его качествах — имя норвежского вингера было темой обсуждения в «Баварии» прошлым летом, и Эберль по-прежнему хотел бы его заполучить.
Тем не менее, потенциальный трансфер из «Лейпцига» осложнён тем, что его трансферная стоимость была бы чрезвычайно высокой.
ℹ️ Bild
@bayernstyle
📰 Контракт Кейна не включает опцию продления до 2030 года.
Взамен «Бавария» пошла на уступки форварду в других аспектах, включая его зарплату и права на имидж. Кейн будет получать рекордную для клуба зарплату, превышающую прежние 25 миллионов евро в год. Генеральный директор Ян-Кристиан Дрезен провел восемь раундов переговоров с отцом Кейна, Патриком, и его братом, Чарли, начиная с лета.
Как и в 2023 году, когда Ке…
❤173👍14👎2💯1🤯1
Signed Rewwy
Showing the 12 most recent of 517 posts we hold for @bayernstyle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 517 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Футбол Новости @Football_sportss · 30,306 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 September 2026
Witcher Sport @sashlan · 25,836 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 September 2026
Новости футбола | Спорта @sport_novosti · 27,465 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 September 2026
Футбол | Лига Чемпионов @viktorinafootballl · 20,051 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 September 2026
Футбольные Новости | Трансферы @Novosti_Footballs · 41,680 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 August 2026
Картавый Футбол объединяет! @KFNik · 95,907 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
La Saeta Rubia @LSR_RM · 33,047 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 September 2026
Barca Family News @BarcaFamilyNews · 35,502 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
We Are The Arsenal | Арсенал @wearethearsenal · 49,192 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 August 2026
AC Milan News • Милан @newsacmilan · 25,500 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
ОБЕ ЗАБЬЮТ @obegoal · 44,082 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 30 August 2026
Реальный Футбол LIVE @rflive · 227,968 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 August 2026
ФУТБОЛЬНИК @football_nik · 108,518 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 August 2026
We Are AC Milan | Милан @acmilannews1899 · 28,240 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 9 September 2026
ФУТБОЛ |Новости футбола 📃 @footballnovosty · 59,242 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
Қияли Тақия @qialitaqiaa · 25,218 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 9 September 2026
Liverpool FC | Ливерпуль @ynwateam · 26,860 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 September 2026
Ливерпуль ~ YNWA @liverpoolfc_tg · 59,957 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026
Breakeven’s | Челси @breakevens · 57,162 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
Реал Мадрид с Зурабом | ZZone @ZZoneRM · 39,526 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
Bayern Munchen @bayern_munich · 32,040 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Баварский Стиль | Бавария Мюнхен” (@bayernstyle), 17,256 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bayernstyle.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.