Spitze im Visier 👀✨ The Bundesliga table after Matchday 4 📊 @Bayern_Munich
❤21

Channel
@bayern_munich
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
32,510subscribers
-405 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001471232703 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bayern_munich |
| Description | We post everything related to Bayern 🔴 We do not claim ownership of any news or content we post Credits to all Twitter accounts we get our info from For ad: @sky_source, https://telega.io/c/Bayern_Munich For cross: @remedy70 Other questions: @antonyfrm |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bayern_munich |
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 07:02 | 32,510 | -9 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 20:00 | 32,519 | -33 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:20 | 32,552 | -25 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:40 | 32,577 | -15 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:36 | 32,592 | -23 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 11:36 | 32,615 | -45 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 09:21 | 32,660 | -21 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:35 | 32,681 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:05 | 32,689 | -11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 32,700 | -15 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:37 | 32,715 | +2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 32,713 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 32,714 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:54 | 32,716 | -9 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 32,725 | -11 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:43 | 32,736 | -13 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 32,749 | -15 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:52 | 32,764 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 32,765 | +4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:22 | 32,761 | first reading |
373 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 80 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 213 of 214 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 373 (3 August 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 343,511 |
| Reactions total | 5,009 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 06:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
9,282 reactions across 348 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7,530 | 81.1% | |
| 🔥 | 744 | 8.02% | |
| 👍 | 410 | 4.42% | |
| 👏 | 217 | 2.34% | |
| 💔 | 87 | 0.937% | |
| 🥰 | 83 | 0.894% | |
| 🍾 | 37 | 0.399% | |
| 💯 | 33 | 0.356% | |
| 😁 | 29 | 0.312% | |
| 👎 | 23 | 0.248% | |
| 🤣 | 16 | 0.172% | |
| 😍 | 13 | 0.14% | |
| 😭 | 12 | 0.129% | |
| 🙏 | 9 | 0.097% | |
| 🤮 | 8 | 0.086% | |
| 🫡 | 8 | 0.086% | |
| ✍ | 3 | 0.032% | |
| 🖕 | 3 | 0.032% | |
| 😢 | 3 | 0.032% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 0.032% | |
| 8 further kinds | 11 | 0.119% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 365 of the 373 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,509 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 373 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Spitze im Visier 👀✨ The Bundesliga table after Matchday 4 📊 @Bayern_Munich
❤21
Our sports director is turning 53 today 🎈 Happy birthday, Max Eberl! 🎂 @Bayern_Munich
❤23
𝗕𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗦𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗺𝘂𝗻𝗴 𝗯𝗲𝗶𝗺 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗲𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗻 𝗪𝗶𝗲𝘀𝗲𝗻-𝗕𝗲𝘀𝘂𝗰𝗵 𝗱𝗲𝘀 𝗙𝗖 𝗕𝗮𝘆𝗲𝗿𝗻 😎🥨🍺 After the 7-0 win against Union Berlin, our team celebrates together with their families at the Oktoberfest. 🎡 @Bayern_Munich
❤22🍾3
𝑪𝒉𝒆𝒆𝒓𝒔! @Bayern_Munich
❤26🔥4
Bayern players with their partners visiting Oktoberfest today @Bayern_Munich
❤22
Bayern bosses at Oktoberfest talking about being behind Dortmund in the table • Jan-Christian Dreesen: "We're completely relaxed about it, it's wonderful. Everyone keeps writing that the league is boring, but I can't see that at all. We're Dortmund's pursuers and we'll certainly chase them down" • Herbert Hainer: "You have to put things in perspective. We've scored 14 goals in four games and only conceded two. The …
❤12
🚨🗣️ Harry Kane on Michael Olise : “He has made an incredible start to the season. I already thought he was fantastic last year. He had a great World Cup and has continued seamlessly from there. I believe that, thanks to his age and his mentality, he will continue to improve. The players around him motivate him, and of course, so does the coach. He is in an excellent environment to improve and continue developing. Si…
❤21
🚨🗣️ Harry Kane on the possibility of winning the Ballon d'Or : “It's a goal to be the best player in the world. It would be a wonderful feeling. The Ballon d'Or is the biggest individual award. Let's see what happens. There are many candidates : Mbappé, Dembélé, Yamal, Rodri. It's exciting because everything is possible this year. There's also Michael Olise who had a great season and a great world cup. We'll see. Th…
❤20🙏2
Consider this your official 𝓦𝓲𝓮𝓼𝓷 dictionary. 📖🥨 @Bayern_Munich
❤22
Happy Oktoberfest Sunday! 🍻🥨 Greetings from our new brand ambassador Javi Martínez! 🥰 @Bayern_Munich
❤33🔥5👍1
FC Bayern mourns the loss of Peter Hermann, who has lost his long battle with the nerve disease ALS at the age of 74. Hermann was, during the historic first Triple win in the club's history in 2013, an indispensable part of the coaching team of the German record champions as the right-hand man of head coach Jupp Heynckes. Rest in peace, Peter. @Bayern_Munich
❤18😭12🕊1
👀👀 @Bayern_Munich
🔥15❤11
Showing the 12 most recent of 373 posts we hold for @bayern_munich. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Post match performances reactions
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 373 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 21 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 29 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@bayern_munich named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 61 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bayern Munchen” (@bayern_munich), 32,510 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bayern_munich.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.