Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Transfers // NEWS

Channel

Transfers // NEWS

@live_transfer_news

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

16,713subscribers

-746 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001653311523
TypeChannel
Username@live_transfer_news
DescriptionStay up-to-date with the latest transfer news! Admin: @MultyBillionaire Ads: @Source_Ads Channel's link: https://t.me/+jj_z07AzT_FmM2Vk
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/live_transfer_news

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

16,71317,46417,088.57 August 2026 — 17,459 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,459 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,462 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,464 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,459 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,449 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,447 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,438 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,437 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,415 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,405 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,382 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,373 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,368 subscribers22 August 2026 — 17,381 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,358 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,348 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,335 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,337 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,327 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,314 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,305 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,293 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,335 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,338 subscribers4 September 2026 — 17,342 subscribers6 September 2026 — 17,325 subscribers9 September 2026 — 17,276 subscribers12 September 2026 — 17,253 subscribers13 September 2026 — 17,224 subscribers15 September 2026 — 17,197 subscribers17 September 2026 — 17,174 subscribers25 September 2026 — 17,086 subscribers4 October 2026 — 16,997 subscribers9 October 2026 — 16,988 subscribers13 October 2026 — 16,962 subscribers14 October 2026 — 16,938 subscribers15 October 2026 — 16,924 subscribers16 October 2026 — 16,910 subscribers17 October 2026 — 16,903 subscribers18 October 2026 — 16,886 subscribers19 October 2026 — 16,883 subscribers20 October 2026 — 16,878 subscribers21 October 2026 — 16,873 subscribers22 October 2026 — 16,855 subscribers23 October 2026 — 16,844 subscribers24 October 2026 — 16,830 subscribers25 October 2026 — 16,817 subscribers27 October 2026 — 16,807 subscribers27 October 2026 — 16,798 subscribers29 October 2026 — 16,792 subscribers30 October 2026 — 16,782 subscribers30 October 2026 — 16,769 subscribers1 November 2026 — 16,760 subscribers2 November 2026 — 16,751 subscribers3 November 2026 — 16,746 subscribers4 November 2026 — 16,733 subscribers5 November 2026 — 16,718 subscribers6 November 2026 — 16,713 subscribers7 August 20266 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 90 days, net -746. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,600–17,577 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 05:1116,713-5
5 Nov 2026, 03:2916,718-15
4 Nov 2026, 02:0016,733-13
3 Nov 2026, 02:0616,746-5
2 Nov 2026, 01:3916,751-9
1 Nov 2026, 01:5016,760-9
30 Oct 2026, 22:4816,769-13
30 Oct 2026, 01:5116,782-10
29 Oct 2026, 02:5116,792-6
27 Oct 2026, 22:1716,798-9
27 Oct 2026, 00:0616,807-10
25 Oct 2026, 22:4016,817-13
24 Oct 2026, 19:0716,830-14
23 Oct 2026, 18:5716,844-11
22 Oct 2026, 21:1916,855-18
21 Oct 2026, 15:3016,873-5
20 Oct 2026, 15:0616,878-5
19 Oct 2026, 16:4716,883-3
18 Oct 2026, 14:1416,886-17
17 Oct 2026, 13:2816,903first reading

Engagement

261 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.24%
avg views ÷ 16,713 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,210
48 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.773%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
48
of 261 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 44 of 48 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held261 (5 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total58,082
Reactions total418
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 17:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈19,600
Videos
≈5
Links
≈3,020

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
13s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,346 reactions across 244 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,47173.8%
👍47114.1%
🔥1624.84%
👎1133.38%
😁732.18%
😢210.628%
🤯120.359%
😱80.239%
👏70.209%
🤔60.179%
🤩20.06%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 247 of the 261 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,346 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 261 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 48 posts held from the last 30 days (4.17%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 16:45 UTC174 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🚨 @Juventus remain interested in AZ Alkmaar striker Bendeguz Kovacs after considering a move last summer. The Hungarian forward's contract extension until 2029 disrupted their previous transfer plans. @Juventus will continue monitoring his development before deciding whether to revive their interest. (Source: Ekremkonur) WHATSAPP CHANNEL 👉 HERE

❤1

6 Nov 2026, 14:45 UTC438 views8 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🚨 Didier Deschamps has rejected the opportunity to become @ManchesterUnited's next manager. @ManchesterUnited approached the former France coach as they consider replacing Michael Carrick, but he is not interested in the job. Unai Emery and Julian Nagelsmann are also reluctant options, while Eddie Howe remains a leading candidate. (Source: DailyMirror) WHATSAPP CHANNEL 👉 HERE

❤6👍2

6 Nov 2026, 12:40 UTC645 views4 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🚨 @ManchesterUnited do not plan to appoint an interim manager if they decide to sack Michael Carrick. Carrick retains support within the club, but Sunday's Premier League clash against @Aston_Villa could prove decisive. Julian Nagelsmann, Fabian Hurzeler and Eddie Howe are among the alternatives under consideration. (Source: SkySports) WHATSAPP CHANNEL 👉 HERE

❤2👍2

6 Nov 2026, 10:40 UTC741 views4 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🚨 Tottenham Hotspur retain the 𝗥𝗜𝗚𝗛𝗧 𝗧𝗢 𝗠𝗔𝗧𝗖𝗛 future bids for Harry Kane despite his new @Bayern_Munich contract. The 33-year-old has extended his deal until 2029, earning around £400,000 per week. Tottenham can match an accepted offer from another club, but any return would depend on Kane's willingness to rejoin. (Source: Telegraph) WHATSAPP CHANNEL 👉 HERE

❤4

6 Nov 2026, 08:40 UTC836 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🚨 @ManchesterUnited are monitoring Bournemouth attacker Marcus Tavernier as they assess potential attacking reinforcements. The 27-year-old has scored six goals in 14 appearances this season and can operate in several attacking positions. Arsenal and @Newcastle_United are also interested, while @ManchesterUnited's transfer priorities could depend on their next manager. (Source: TEAMtalk) WHATSAPP CHANNEL 👉 HERE

👍2

5 Nov 2026, 18:40 UTC≈1,160 views11 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🚨 @Juventus are considering January moves for @ManchesterUnited’s Benjamin Šeško and Monaco’s Folarin Balogun. The Italian club want to strengthen their attack by bringing in a physical striker. (Source: Calciomercato) WHATSAPP CHANNEL 👉 HERE

❤7👍4

5 Nov 2026, 16:40 UTC≈1,160 views3 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🚨 Brighton, @BarcelonaEn and Lille are interested in signing Estoril's 18-year-old defender Jordan Arnolin in January. Scouts from all three clubs watched the Portuguese youngster against Porto, where he made his first senior start. Arnolin is under contract until June 2029, and no formal offers have been made, although approaches are expected. (Source: TEAMtalk) WHATSAPP CHANNEL 👉 HERE

👍2❤1

5 Nov 2026, 14:40 UTC≈1,150 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🚨 Leeds United are considering a January move for Galatasaray midfielder Gabriel Sara to strengthen their attack. The 27-year-old Brazilian has two goals and four assists in 10 games and is keen to play in the Premier League. Leeds also have Coventry City's Jack Rudoni and Lyon's Pavel Sulc on their radar, although Sulc is currently injured. (Source: TEAMtalk) WHATSAPP CHANNEL 👉 HERE

👍6

5 Nov 2026, 12:40 UTC≈1,160 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🚨 Tottenham Hotspur have added Monza striker Gustavo Varela to their January shortlist amid competition from Arsenal and Chelsea. The 21-year-old has scored 11 goals in 10 appearances this season, attracting interest from several European clubs. Monza want at least £17M for Varela, with @Newcastle_United, Brighton and @Borussia_Dortmund also monitoring him. (Source: fussball_news) WHATSAPP CHANNEL 👉 HERE

❤5🔥1

5 Nov 2026, 11:29 UTC≈1,140 views26 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🚨🇵🇹 BREAKING: @CRISTIANO RETIRES FROM INTERNATIONAL FOOTBALL.

❤25👏1

5 Nov 2026, 10:35 UTC≈1,170 views9 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🚨 Napoli are interested in signing @BarcelonaEn midfielder Gavi and have contacted his representatives about his future. Sporting director Giovanni Manna has enquired about a potential loan deal with an option to buy the 22-year-old. Gavi has not expressed a desire to leave @BarcelonaEn, while the club have shown no intention of selling him. (Source: sport) WHATSAPP CHANNEL 👉 HERE

❤8🔥1

5 Nov 2026, 08:35 UTC≈1,150 views12 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🚨 @ManchesterUnited, Chelsea and Liverpool are seriously interested in Eintracht Frankfurt defender Nnamdi Collins. The three Premier League clubs are scouting the 22-year-old, but no formal transfer negotiations have started. Frankfurt have ruled out a January sale and could consider offers from €35M, with Collins under contract until June 2030. (Source: fussball_news) WHATSAPP CHANNEL 👉 HERE

❤10👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 261 posts we hold for @live_transfer_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@live_transfer_news edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
5 November 2026
Most recent edit
5 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 13 posts on @live_transfer_news as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
6 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
29 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Polls

The 6 most recent of 25 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Nov 2026, 04:31 UTCAnonymous Poll72 voters

Arsenal fans do you want him?

  1. Yes85%
  2. No18%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

5 Nov 2026, 04:31 UTCAnonymous Poll63 voters

Arsenal fans do you want him?

  1. Yes83%
  2. No17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Nov 2026, 04:30 UTCAnonymous Poll53 voters

Where does he fit perfectly?

  1. Brighton68%
  2. Barca34%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

5 Nov 2026, 04:29 UTCAnonymous Poll45 voters

Where should he go?

  1. Everton31%
  2. Sunderland44%
  3. Crystal Palace29%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

5 Nov 2026, 04:28 UTCAnonymous Poll53 voters

United fans do you want him?

  1. Yes47%
  2. No57%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

31 Aug 2026, 05:02 UTCAnonymous Poll114 voters

Where should he go?

  1. Villa32%
  2. Newcastle39%
  3. Arsenal37%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 261 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Transfers // NEWS” (@live_transfer_news), 16,713 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/live_transfer_news.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.