Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Tottenham Hotspur

Channel

Tottenham Hotspur

@tottenhm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

14,104subscribers

+48 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001348843339
TypeChannel
Username@tottenhm
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held18
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tottenhm

Growth

14,03714,10414,070.56 August 2026 — 14,056 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,056 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,058 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,069 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,080 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,083 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,072 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,090 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,078 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,076 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,074 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,060 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,046 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,043 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,037 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,040 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,049 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,104 subscribers6 August 202622 August 2026
18 measurements spanning 17 days, net +48. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,027–14,114 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 20:1914,104+55
21 Aug 2026, 12:5214,049+9
20 Aug 2026, 13:3414,040+3
19 Aug 2026, 16:3614,037-6
18 Aug 2026, 13:5314,043-3
17 Aug 2026, 11:4814,046-14
16 Aug 2026, 03:1314,060-14
14 Aug 2026, 10:3514,074-2
13 Aug 2026, 01:2414,076-2
12 Aug 2026, 01:5514,078-12
11 Aug 2026, 03:4514,090+18
10 Aug 2026, 06:3814,072-11
9 Aug 2026, 05:5214,083+3
8 Aug 2026, 07:0314,080+11
7 Aug 2026, 10:0414,069+11
6 Aug 2026, 12:1114,058+2
6 Aug 2026, 02:2214,056no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:3414,056first reading

Engagement

92 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.2%
avg views ÷ 14,104 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,720
92 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
92
of 92 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 91 of 92 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held92 (1 August 202622 August 2026)
Views total158,664
Reactions total3,082
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

2,922 reactions across 88 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,53286.7%
👎39013.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 91 of the 92 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,082reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC560 views14 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

MATCHDAY! 🙌 🆚 Brentford 🏟️ Gtech Community Stadium 🏆 Premier League ⏰ 5.30pm BST

👍14

21 Aug 2026, 23:35 UTC≈1,230 views16 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Roberto De Zerbi on the transfer window and Savinho... "It’s not right to speak about the players until they are official. I’m very happy. We have not finished yet in the transfer market. "It’s an important part because so far we have had a great signings, great players, great behaviour, great spirit, and great personality. "But in the Premier League you don’t win the game with the names and big players. There are a

👍16

21 Aug 2026, 23:15 UTC≈1,240 views20 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Tottenham boss Roberto de Zerbi on the new season... "Very intense three months, but I think we can't forget what happened. Last season is a big lesson for us. We have to go on another page and start an important season. "We're building a new project. The first two targets is very clear in ourselves is to find the soul of the team. Second target to improve in our organisation with and without the ball. Our style has

👍20

21 Aug 2026, 21:56 UTC≈1,260 views30 reactionsread 22 August 2026

🚨⚪️ Roberto De Zerbi: “Lucas Bergvall is staying, 100% sure”. “We spoke a lot in pre season. He’s a top player, a top potential player”. “I think now he wants to stay and we have no problem”, says via AlasdairGold.

👍30

21 Aug 2026, 21:24 UTC≈1,340 views27 reactionsread 22 August 2026

🚨Roberto De Zerbi says the Club, board and sporting director are working ‘very well’ during the transfer window so far: ✅“I think the club, the board, the sporting director are working very well. They closed the targets who were the plan A.” 🤝”We have not finished, we have to complete the squad, but I’m VERY HAPPY until now from the transfer market.”

👍27

21 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC≈1,730 views62 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

BREAKING: Micky van de Ven will be Tottenham's new captain. 🇮🇹🎙️ Roberto De Zerbi: “The new captain is Micky van de Ven. The second Pedro Porro. The third Ben Davies. The fourth James Maddison. The fifth Archie Gray. Why five? Because I want many captains in the pitch.” [TomBarclay] ©️

👍62

21 Aug 2026, 07:13 UTC≈1,940 views46 reactionsread 22 August 2026

🚨💣𝐌𝐀𝐉𝐎𝐑 𝐁𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐊𝐈𝐍𝐆! | Tottenham Hotspur have reached an agreement to sign @Manchester_City winger Savinho in a deal that could be worth up to £85M. 🤝Spurs are set to pay £75M up front, plus £10M in potential bonuses for the Brazilian – £5M of which are highly achievable. 👨🏻‍💻[David Ornstein]

👍44👎2

20 Aug 2026, 23:26 UTC≈2,070 views41 reactionsread 22 August 2026

🚨⚪️ Tottenham also confident to get Omar Marmoush deal done after Savinho deal agreed tonight. Negotiations at advanced stages for the Egyptian forward. Personal terms agreed earlier this week and #THFC confident.[Fabrizio Romano]

👍41

20 Aug 2026, 23:20 UTC≈2,000 views54 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Omar Marmoush has already agreed personal terms with Tottenham and an agreement with #ManCity is ‘very close’, as per [szyexcl]. 🇪🇬

👍53👎1

20 Aug 2026, 22:51 UTC≈1,900 views68 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🚨⚪️ BREAKING: Tottenham reach verbal agreement with @Manchester_City to sign Savinho, here we go! Club to club verbal agreement in place tonight with Sávio set to travel for medical at #THFC. Fee will be over £75m, details to follow. Separate talks for Omar Marmoush continue.

👍67👎1

20 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC≈1,950 views23 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

🚨 #THFC’s 2027/28 home kit is set to feature the club’s monogram crest. 👀 Nike are expected to replace the current cockerel badge with the THFC monogram, bringing a classic look back to the shirt. 👕 The kit will feature a white base with Binary Blue sleeves/details. Footy_Headlines & TheSpursWatch Thoughts on this? 🤷‍♂️

👍22👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 92 posts we hold for @tottenhm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 55,869 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 30 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Tottenham Hotspur” (@tottenhm), 14,104 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tottenhm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.