Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FC Inter Milan

Channel

FC Inter Milan

@inter_milan

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,479subscribers

-64 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001327883628
TypeChannel
Username@inter_milan
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/inter_milan

Growth

11,46811,55411,5116 August 2026 — 11,543 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,543 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,551 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,544 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,543 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,546 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,547 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,553 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,554 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,547 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,540 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,537 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,528 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,531 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,525 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,534 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,528 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,520 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,517 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,520 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,506 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,501 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,496 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,490 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,484 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,476 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,468 subscribers6 September 2026 — 11,479 subscribers11,4796 August 20266 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 31 days, net -64. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,455–11,567 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 08:2211,479+11
4 Sept 2026, 00:3711,468-8
2 Sept 2026, 18:1211,476-8
1 Sept 2026, 19:4511,484-6
31 Aug 2026, 19:2611,490-6
30 Aug 2026, 22:3611,496-5
30 Aug 2026, 00:1111,501-5
29 Aug 2026, 02:1311,506-14
28 Aug 2026, 05:2311,520+3
27 Aug 2026, 04:0511,517-3
26 Aug 2026, 02:2711,520-8
25 Aug 2026, 05:1611,528-6
24 Aug 2026, 02:4811,534+9
22 Aug 2026, 08:0611,525-6
20 Aug 2026, 20:4311,531+3
19 Aug 2026, 20:1711,528-9
18 Aug 2026, 16:5711,537-3
17 Aug 2026, 17:3511,540-7
16 Aug 2026, 14:4611,547-7
15 Aug 2026, 00:4611,554first reading

Engagement

232 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.10%
avg views ÷ 11,479 subscribers
Avg views / post
471
192 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
193
of 232 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 175 of 192 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held232 (4 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total90,435
Reactions total1,523
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 23:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,722 reactions across 200 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,722100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 211 of the 232 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,799 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 232 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 21:07 UTC185 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

GRAN GALA DEL CALCIO: FEDERICO DIMARCO MVP SERIE A 2025/2026 ⚫️🔵

2 Sept 2026, 21:05 UTC192 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Lautaro Martinez: "Voglio ringraziare i colleghi che mi hanno votato ancora una volta. Era molto difficile ripartire l'anno scorso ma quello che portiamo avanti è la mentalità e la voglia di raggiungere traguardi di gruppo. E' la cosa più importante e abbiamo fatto un ottimo lavoro. La cosa più importante è la forza del gruppo, essere forti insieme dentro lo spogliatoio. E' la cosa che sottolineo sempre. Rabbia per

2 Sept 2026, 20:55 UTC171 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Gran Galà del Calcio, i migliori attaccanti per la stagione 2025/2026 sono: Nico Paz-Lautaro Martinez-Donyell Malen

👍1

2 Sept 2026, 20:46 UTC184 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Calhanoglu: "L'obiettivo per la stagione è difendere lo scudetto e fare meglio in Champions League"

👍1

2 Sept 2026, 20:45 UTC179 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Gran Galà del Calcio, i migliori centrocampisti per la stagione 2025/2026 sono: McTominay Calhanoglu Modric

👍1

2 Sept 2026, 20:38 UTC186 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Bastoni: "Siamo molto orgogliosi di quello che abbiamo fatto l'anno scorso, nessuno se lo aspettava da noi, forse nemmeno noi. Quello che non abbiamo mai fatto è ripeterci e vogliamo farlo quest'anno. Un anno difficile? Sì, è un discorso molto ampio questo. Sui social sono tutti molto bravi a criticare e giudicarti. E' il nostro lavoro, abbiamo scelto questo. Ci siamo sentiti anche con Giorgio Chiellini dopo la Juve

👍5

2 Sept 2026, 20:31 UTC176 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Gran Galà del Calcio, i migliori difensori per la stagione 2025/2026 sono: Palestra Akanji Bastoni Dimarco

👍5

2 Sept 2026, 20:15 UTC208 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Gran Galà del Calcio, il premio per la migliore società dell’anno va a Fc Internazionale 🖤💙

👍6

2 Sept 2026, 20:14 UTC210 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Dimarco: "L'interesse del Barcellona ? Fa sempre piacere essere accostati a questi grandi club. Sapete la mia storia all'Inter, sono qui da tanti anni, ci sono cresciuto. Per quanto riguarda il rinnovo, al momento non ne abbiamo ancora parlato: speravo che succedesse, visto come è finita la scorsa stagione, però ci sarà modo di parlarne prossimamente"

👍5

2 Sept 2026, 20:12 UTC206 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🚨⚫️🔵 Lautaro: “Il Barcellona ? Quando arrivano queste offerte e queste chiamate fa sempre piacere perché uno lavora per stare al top. Le voci erano vere ma io ho le idee ben chiare, ho voluto rimanere qua con i miei compagni e questi tifosi magnifici. Io rimarrei per sempre e finché mi vogliono resto qua. Poi nel lavoro lo sappiamo, quando non servi più ti mandano via. L’Inter per me è tutto orgoglio, felicità e vog

👍6

2 Sept 2026, 20:11 UTC192 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Marotta: "Baccin saprà sostituire il maestro, è all'Inter da più di 10 anni, ha DNA interista. Non è corretto entrare nel merito, Ausilio aveva un rapporto ottimo con la proprietà. Dopo un periodo così lungo, è giusto che si voglia misurare altrove. Ha preso una decisione lui da una parte e noi dall'altra ma in modo molto consensuale. Non ritengo corretto entrare nel merito, sono dinamiche nostre tra persone che si s

👍2

2 Sept 2026, 20:09 UTC228 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Marotta: "Desidero ringraziare Piero a nome di tutto il Club, della Proprietà e di ogni singolo dipendente della grande famiglia nerazzurra. Mi uniscono a lui momenti di gioia, di vittorie, di lavoro intenso e di tanta passione. Dario conosce bene il Club ed è oggi pronto ad assumere questo nuovo ruolo che la Proprietà ed io abbiamo pensato per lui. Si tratta di una scelta innovativa, pur nel segno di una continuità

👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 232 posts we hold for @inter_milan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Aug 2026, 21:59 UTCAnonymous Poll102 voters

👇

  1. Calhanoglu73%
  2. Dimarco13%
  3. Pavard10%
  4. Martinez12%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 232 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

PSG | Paris Saint-Germain
@paris_saint_geermain · 30,473
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
Arsenal
@arsenal_london · 144,420
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
Chelsea
@Chealsea · 33,177
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
Bayern Munchen
@bayern_munich · 32,660
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
Real Madrid C.F.
@real_madrid · 113,183
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FC Inter Milan” (@inter_milan), 11,479 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inter_milan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.