Posted without readable text

Channel
Chelsea
@Chealsea
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
33,041subscribers
+89 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001218568927 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Chealsea |
| Description | Blue is the colour 🔵 Ads: @Source_Ads, @yanyanuli, https://telega.io/c/Chealsea |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 18 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Chealsea |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 33,041 | +10 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:06 | 33,031 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:55 | 33,036 | +8 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:52 | 33,028 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 16:48 | 33,029 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 33,033 | -16 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 33,049 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:06 | 33,052 | -12 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 33,064 | +10 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 33,054 | +7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 33,047 | +9 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:31 | 33,038 | +39 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 32,999 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 33,003 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:59 | 32,998 | +32 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:04 | 32,966 | +14 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:51 | 32,952 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 32,952 | first reading |
Engagement
190 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.1%
- avg views ÷ 33,041 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,340
- 188 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.72%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 190
- of 190 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 185 of 188 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 190 (5 August 2026 – 23 August 2026) |
| Views total | 627,747 |
| Reactions total | 10,687 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Aug 2026, 05:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈18,000
- Videos
- ≈121
- Links
- ≈931
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
10,097 reactions across 168 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8,487 | 84.1% | |
| 👍 | 607 | 6.01% | |
| 🔥 | 242 | 2.40% | |
| 🤔 | 137 | 1.36% | |
| 👏 | 136 | 1.35% | |
| 👎 | 129 | 1.28% | |
| 😁 | 118 | 1.17% | |
| 🏆 | 115 | 1.14% | |
| 🤯 | 76 | 0.753% | |
| 🤡 | 35 | 0.347% | |
| 💩 | 15 | 0.149% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 185 of the 190 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,687reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 190 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 188 we hold a reading for · 0.5%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Chealsea. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 190 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 23 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
🚨 OFFICIAL: Benoit Badiashile has completed a season-long loan move to Serie A side Napoli. (ChelseaFC) #CFC
😁20❤14💩4👍3
9️⃣✅
❤94
Chelsea pinned a photo
Chelsea have turned down an approach from Roma to loan Jamie Gittens. Gittens viewed as part of Xabi Alonso's plans and is expected to remain at the club this summer.🔵 🔗 Ben Jacobs
❤45👍3
𝐎𝐅𝐅𝐈𝐂𝐈𝐀𝐋: Chelsea forward Joao Pedro has signed a new contract with the club until June 2034. ✍️ 🗣️ On signing a new contract, Pedro said: “I am very happy to sign a new contract with Chelsea. “I always dreamed of playing for a big club, and it means a lot to me to give my long-term commitment to this club. Chelsea has a long tradition of winning and it has big ambitions for the future. “I have a very good relati…
🔥26❤18
Joao Pedro ✂️😮💨
❤159👍12😁2
Chelsea have made midfielder Dario Essugo available to leave on a season-long loan deal. The 21-year-old signed from Portuguese club Sporting for £18m in 2025 and is now expected to leave on a temporary basis and a move to RC Strasbourg is the prominent possibility. Chelsea have also proposed a move to the Ligue 1 club for Mykhailo Mudryk. [Nizaarkinsella - BBC Sport] #CFC #ChelseaFC #Essugo #Transfers
❤41
Leeds United are in talks to sign Chelsea winger Mykhailo Mudryk on a season-long loan. It’s understood their interest is serious and the Blues have rejected an initial bid from Leeds. Meanwhile, RC Strasbourg and Coventry City also remain keen on signing the 25-year-old. [Nizaar Kinsella - BBC Sport] #CFC #ChelseaFC #LUFC #LeedsUnited #Mudryk
❤43
🚨🇺🇦 OFFICIAL: Shakhtar Donetsk will play Champions League home games at Stamford Bridge this season. “Playing our Champions League home matches at Stamford Bridge is a special opportunity for Shakhtar. We are grateful to Chelsea Football Club for the opportunity to host our games at this special venue”. 🔗 Fabrizio Romano
❤56
RC Strasbourg are closing in on a deal to sign Chelsea forward Deivid Washington. It’s understood an agreement has been reached for around €10 million between the two sides. [Cyril Olivès - L’Équipe] #CFC #ChelseaFC #RCSA #RCStrasbourg #Washington
❤36
🚨 𝗡𝗘𝗪: FootyHeadlines have revealed images of Chelsea's unreleased third kit for this season.
❤44
Showing the 12 most recent of 190 posts we hold for @Chealsea. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Who was your Star of the Match from today's friendly? 🌟 #DiscoverASR
- Joao Pedro87%
- Morgan Rogers8%
- Reece James9%
- Wes Fofana4%
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 190 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 23 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 42,345 of 1,584,486entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 30 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@herewegoclub · 85,57018 postsGoal Sport™
@goal_sport_football · 40,10715 postsTransfers // NEWS
@live_transfer_news · 17,38113 postsJust Football
@jfball · 93,6979 postsPremier League
@premier_league_football_news · 86,6768 postsArsenal
@arsenal_london · 143,5575 postsErling Haaland
@erling_haaland · 12,6164 postsESPN FC
@Espnfc_news · 62,2854 postsTHE FOOTBALL HUB ⚽️⚡️
@thefootball_hub · 25,3594 postsManchester City FC
@manchester_city · 128,9693 postsMANCHESTER UNITED 🔴
@manchesterunited · 94,4003 postsCHELSEA ANALYSIS 📈🔵
@ChelseaAnalysis · 47,9782 postsFantasy Premier League
@Fantasy_Epl · 31,0632 postsJuventus
@juventus · 26,9302 postsLiverpool FC
@liverpool_always · 32,0662 postsS.S.C Napoli
@Napoli_SSC_Updates · 4,7652 postsReal Madrid C.F.
@real_madrid · 113,4062 postsSports Network
@sports_network_tg · 2,0712 postsTottenham Hotspur
@tottenhm · 14,1042 postsESPN FC
@espnfc1 · 53,8631 postLive Football idolman
@idolmanfootball · 21 postProlific Daily Sports News 💯🔥🆓
@prolificdailynews · 111 postUEFA Champions League
@uefa_champ_league · 55,5051 postVarzeshPress|ورزش پرس
@Varzesh_Press · 21 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@premier_league_football_news · 86,6766 postsManchester City FC
@manchester_city · 128,9695 postsAC Milan
@milan · 13,6345 postsJuventus
@juventus · 26,9304 postsAl Hilal
@hilal_al · 7,1283 postsInsta Tools Hub (@Instatoolboxbot)
@instatoolshub · 7671 postMANCHESTER UNITED 🔴
@manchesterunited · 94,4001 postS.S.C Napoli
@Napoli_SSC_Updates · 4,7651 postTottenham Hotspur
@tottenhm · 14,1041 postUEFA Champions League
@uefa_champ_league · 55,5051 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ChelseaFcWorldWide_001 · 120,627
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
@Chelsea_fc_worldwide · 94,918
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
@CFC_ChelseaFC · 137,063
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
@premier_league_football_news · 86,676
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 August 2026
@manchesterunited · 94,400
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 August 2026
@Sky_Sportz_football · 67,210
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
@Troll_Football_Telegram · 142,466
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
@real_madrid · 113,406
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
@chelsea_prideoflondon · 197,125
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
@Espnfc_news · 62,285
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026
@Espn_Football_News_UK · 94,515
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 August 2026
@manchester_city · 128,969
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
@arsenal_london · 143,557
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
@jfball · 93,697
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 August 2026
@sofascore_uk · 56,905
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
@Football433_uk · 68,224
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
@boombet301 · 67,527
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
@liverpool_worldwide · 63,185
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 21 August 2026
@Realmadrid_world · 117,531
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
@Premier_League_Update · 117,646
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
@uefa_champion_leaguee · 151,027
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
@transfer_news_football · 89,706
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
@herewegoclub · 85,570
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
@Premier_League_News_TG · 241,025
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 31 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Chelsea” (@Chealsea), 33,041 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Chealsea.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.