✔️Welcome to Mancity channel
▶️we are loud,proud&loyal ManCity Fans
▶️We provide transfer rumors,news and match results from different reliable sources every day
Ads @jaybet
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 41 days, net +43. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 45,582–45,773 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 20:38
45,736
+29
15 Sept 2026, 21:01
45,707
-40
14 Sept 2026, 03:01
45,747
+67
12 Sept 2026, 08:16
45,680
-32
10 Sept 2026, 06:57
45,712
-24
6 Sept 2026, 22:35
45,736
-15
4 Sept 2026, 09:35
45,751
+2
2 Sept 2026, 23:57
45,749
+13
1 Sept 2026, 20:35
45,736
+27
31 Aug 2026, 16:59
45,709
+20
30 Aug 2026, 16:34
45,689
+9
29 Aug 2026, 13:08
45,680
+63
28 Aug 2026, 11:58
45,617
+6
27 Aug 2026, 10:57
45,611
+7
26 Aug 2026, 11:34
45,604
-27
25 Aug 2026, 11:52
45,631
-22
24 Aug 2026, 13:48
45,653
-9
22 Aug 2026, 21:15
45,662
-15
21 Aug 2026, 09:54
45,677
-21
19 Aug 2026, 13:26
45,698
first reading
Engagement
1,041 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 96 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.56%
avg views ÷ 45,736 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,000
642 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
642
of 1,041 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 639 of 642 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held
1,041 (6 August 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Views total
1,925,785
Reactions total
77,441
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Sept 2026, 09:24 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈30,200
Videos
≈1,500
Links
≈3,950
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 15s
Average length
25s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
112,661 reactions across 994 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
61,342
54.4%
🔥
18,911
16.8%
😁
12,817
11.4%
👍
8,823
7.83%
😢
5,775
5.13%
🙏
1,246
1.11%
🎉
1,215
1.08%
😱
1,051
0.933%
😭
849
0.754%
🙊
488
0.433%
🤣
144
0.128%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 994 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112,661 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 9 August 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
26
across the posts below
Posts paid on
22
of 999 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mancity247. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 9 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🚨🚨🌗| NEW: Manchester City are keeping a close eye on Porto midfielder Victor Froholdt, with scouts watching the 20-year-old shine in their 3-1 win over Benfica on Sunday.
City returned to the Dragão just 11 days after facing Porto themselves, with Froholdt named the hosts’ best player after scoring and producing an impressive all-round display.
[abolapt / Sport_Witness]
🚨🗣 Matías Mana (performance analyst for the Argentine national team) told The Athletic:
"He is a winner by nature
Midfielder Enzo Fernández (number 8) needs to grow with the movement of the ball
And to be involved across the entire pitch; to feel free and demand the ball wherever he wants
He connects parts of the play with each other, and he can't just stand in static spaces and position himself waiting for the b…
🚨 WE’RE NOW ON WHATSAPP! 🚨
Stay connected with us on our new WhatsApp Channel 📲💙
⚽ Get the latest Manchester City news, updates, lineups, transfers, match updates & more — all in one place!
👉 Join our WhatsApp Channel:
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VbCmKJR0gcfSUhz4Us3Q
💙 Follow us on WhatsApp and don’t miss a thing! 🔥
🚨🚨 Alex James — MEN:
Ndiaye left an immediate impression at Manchester City
where the coaching staff were quickly impressed by his mentality and commitment in training.
And his work rate levels won over everyone inside the club
Tijjani Reijnders: “Once my career is over, I don’t want to have to work anymore. Of course, I probably wouldn’t have needed to after my contract at Man City either, but this move [to Al Qadsiah] allows me to secure the future of the next generations of my family. I’m not going to lie. By signing this contract, I can make sure even my grandchildren are financially secure, so why wouldn’t I do it?” [via MailSport]
🚨🚨 According to Ellis Peters:
Zinedine Zidane used Ryan Cherki as a playmaker within a 4-3-3 formation during the French national team training sessions 🇫🇷👀
🚨🚨🌖| BREAKING: Antoine Semenyo has reportedly withdrawn from the Ghana squad and will miss the September–October international break.
The Man City forward has been ruled out with a swollen ankle and won't be available for Ghana’s 2027 AFCON qualifiers against Côte d’Ivoire and The Gambia, as well as their friendly against Morocco.
[3NewsGH]
🚨🩵 List of Manchester City players who will miss the international break:
❌ Jeremy Doku
❌ Alan Elias
❌ Phil Foden
❌ Marcus Bettinelli
❌ Matheus Nunes
🩵 A short rest period before returning to continue the journey with City.
❤111👍12
Signed MUH’D JAMIU
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,041 posts we hold for @mancity247. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Who registered the most assists for Manchester City in the Premier League during the 2024/25 season?
Kevin De Bruyne66%
Savinho13%
Bernardo Silva17%
Ilkay Gundogan4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 9 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Premier League @english_premier_league_links · 39,246 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
Manchester City FC @manchester_city · 129,997 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
Premier League @premier · 141,074 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
LIVE SCORE MATCH @live_score_Cricket · 30,594 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 7 September 2026
🔴Manchester United🔴 @manchester_united_uk · 51,994 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 August 2026
BBC Sport Football @BBC_Sports_Football_Updates · 52,712 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 August 2026
Arsenal | Gunners Update @gunners_update · 21,569 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 23 September 2026
English Premier League Update @Premier_League_Update · 118,043 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
Music Stream (Ghana 🇬🇭) @ghanamstream · 22,692 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 20 September 2026
Football XI News Live @footballxilive · 33,149 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 4 September 2026
Premier League @premier_league_football_news · 87,484 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 August 2026
Here We Go Club @herewegoclub · 84,336 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
VETLAND SPORTS @vetland_sports_football1 · 109,440 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
Premier League 🦁 @PremierLeague_football · 25,772 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 September 2026
EA SPORTS FC 26 @ea_fc26_news_fifa · 27,322 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 September 2026
Talk Football HD Official @talkfootballhd_official · 28,786 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 17 September 2026
Sky Sports World @sky_sports_world · 77,561 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 19 August 2026
FC BARCELONA @barcelonaen · 116,837 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
Football @footballfactlys · 32,641 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
Premier League News @Premier_League_News_TG · 261,764 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
FC Barcelona @barcelona_eng · 22,352 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 September 2026
Transfer News Live @TransferNews_Live · 49,237 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
𝐒𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐬𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐩𝐞 @SportsScope · 100,354 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 8 September 2026
Football memes @soccer_memes · 34,552 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 72 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Manchester City” (@mancity247), 45,736 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mancity247.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.