Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 51 days, net -669. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 51,431–52,317 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 19:55
51,533
-166
17 Sept 2026, 09:59
51,699
-85
13 Sept 2026, 15:21
51,784
-57
11 Sept 2026, 16:39
51,841
-26
9 Sept 2026, 04:59
51,867
+146
5 Sept 2026, 21:42
51,721
-89
3 Sept 2026, 16:59
51,810
-48
2 Sept 2026, 11:24
51,858
-12
1 Sept 2026, 08:46
51,870
-19
31 Aug 2026, 12:07
51,889
-29
30 Aug 2026, 12:25
51,918
-31
29 Aug 2026, 12:53
51,949
-25
28 Aug 2026, 15:14
51,974
-34
27 Aug 2026, 14:55
52,008
-8
26 Aug 2026, 13:16
52,016
-39
25 Aug 2026, 11:33
52,055
-28
24 Aug 2026, 13:56
52,083
-63
22 Aug 2026, 18:07
52,146
+51
21 Aug 2026, 06:23
52,095
-22
20 Aug 2026, 07:34
52,117
first reading
Engagement
396 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 144 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.08%
avg views ÷ 51,533 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,130
188 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
188
of 396 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 186 of 188 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026
Posts held
396 (5 August 2026 – 30 September 2026)
Views total
589,130
Reactions total
7,117
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
30 Sept 2026, 22:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈13,600
Videos
≈2
Links
≈1,270
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
16s
Average length
16s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
16,543 reactions across 392 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
12,534
75.8%
🤣
1,012
6.12%
🔥
891
5.39%
😁
556
3.36%
👍
307
1.86%
👎
232
1.40%
👏
226
1.37%
💔
193
1.17%
🤡
106
0.641%
😱
91
0.55%
😢
61
0.369%
🏆
42
0.254%
🥱
38
0.23%
🤨
32
0.193%
🖕
27
0.163%
❤🔥
25
0.151%
🕊
22
0.133%
💩
21
0.127%
😭
18
0.109%
🤮
18
0.109%
15 further kinds
91
0.55%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 392 of the 396 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,543 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 396 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 30 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 395 we hold a reading for · 0.3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @skysport_football_official. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 396 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 30 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🚨💣 BREAKING: Cristiano Ronaldo announces he has LEFT PORTUGAL NATIONAL TEAM CAMP. 🇵🇹
“After the National Team coach’s press conference, and following a conversation with the President of the Portuguese Football Federation, I have decided to leave the National Team training camp”.
“In due time, I will tell all Portuguese people the truth about the reasons that led to my departure from the national team, to which I h…
🚨 Pep Guardiola’s letter to Manchester City fans.
“I want every single Man City fan to know I am here; more than ever”.
“I am, always have been, always will, be behind my club, my owner, my chairman, Ferran, the players, staff, Enzo and you, our unique supporters”.
“Let me be clear: we will get through this together”.
“I love you all”. 🩵
#Sport | #Skynews
📡 @skysport_football_official
🚨 𝗢𝗙𝗙𝗜𝗖𝗜𝗔𝗟: The FA have CHARGED Fulham manager Álvaro Arbeloa with misconduct following his comments about the refereeing against Manchester United.
The FA allege that Arbeloa acted improperly by making comments that implied BIAS and/or questioned the integrity of a match official during his post-match interview.
He has until Thursday, October 1 to respond.
🚨🚨 𝗠𝗔𝗝𝗢𝗥 𝗕𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚: Cristiano Ronaldo is NOT HAPPY with how his situation was handled by Portugal coach Jorge Jesús and the Portuguese FA.
Ronaldo and Jorge Jesús had AGREED before the international break that he would play in BOTH home matches.
The coach later decided he also wanted Ronaldo involved against Norway, and they agreed Cristiano would come on in the 2nd HALF... But it NEVER happened.
In the end, Cristi…
🚨🇧🇷 𝐁𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐊𝐈𝐍𝐆: 𝐑𝐀𝐏𝐇𝐈𝐍𝐇𝐀 𝐋𝐄𝐀𝐕𝐄𝐒 𝐁𝐑𝐀𝐙𝐈𝐋 𝐂𝐀𝐌𝐏 😳
According to geglobo, Raphinha will 𝗡𝗢𝗧 feature against India and is returning to Barcelona. No risks will be taken with the winger ✈️🔵🔴
Medical tests have ruled out a muscle injury, although some swelling and fluid remain in his thigh 🩺
Barcelona are increasingly concerned about their captain’s workload with Brazil following another physical scare during the internation…
🚨 𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗧: Lamine Yamal has now produced 18 G/A in his last 8 games:
vs Vallecano: ⚽️⚽️
vs Valencia: ⚽️⚽️
vs Feyenoord: ⚽️⚽️🅰️
vs Levante: ⚽️⚽️
vs Racing: 🅰️🅰️⚽️
vs Sevilla: 🅰️🅰️
vs England: ⚽️
vs Croatia: ⚽️⚽️🅰️
#Sport | #Skynews
📡 @skysport_football_official
🚨🦁 𝗢𝗙𝗙𝗜𝗖𝗜𝗔𝗟: Premier League CEO Richard Masters' statement:
"The core decision establishes the facts of what happened at Manchester City during this period. It details how the club systematically broke Premier League Rules for nearly a decade."
"It also vindicates the Premier League’s decision to pursue this case against Manchester City. While the process to date has been both long and difficult, the League has re…
🚨 𝗕𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚: Manchester City were informed that they had been found GUILTY of more than 100 Premier League financial breaches back in JULY.
City then went on to spend more than £450 MILLION during the summer transfer window, bringing in SEVEN senior signings.
[ESPN]
🚨✅ 𝗢𝗙𝗙𝗜𝗖𝗜𝗔𝗟: An independent Commission has found Manchester City 𝗚𝗨𝗜𝗟𝗧𝗬 of all charges related to serious breaches of the Premier League’s financial rules over a 9-season period, and the majority of charges in relation to its failure to co-operate with the League’s investigation.
The Premier League have confirmed that Manchester City have been found guilty on 𝗘𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗬 charge in the 115 case.
Manchester City now have u…
🚨 𝗢𝗙𝗙𝗜𝗖𝗜𝗔𝗟: Hansi Flick has been named La Liga 𝐌𝐀𝐍𝐀𝐆𝐄𝐑 𝐎𝐅 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐌𝐎𝐍𝐓𝐇 for September.
Barcelona went 4 games unbeaten in September, scoring 19 goals and conceding just 5.
#Sport | #Skynews
📡 @skysport_football_official
🚨🗣️ 𝗡𝗘𝗪: Wayne Rooney says he would NOT accept a 2011/12 Premier League winners’ medal if Manchester City are stripped of the title:
“I wouldn’t really feel comfortable accepting another Premier League medal, if I’m being honest.”
“I don’t think we DESERVE it. We didn’t do enough that season to win the league. We were six or seven points clear with four or five games to go and we threw it away.”
“If the City playe…
🔥24❤12
Showing the 12 most recent of 396 posts we hold for @skysport_football_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@skysport_football_official edited 19 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
14 September 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 396 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 30 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
BOOMBET @boombet301 · 65,050 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
Premier League Live @PL_live_football · 20,846 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 26 September 2026
Football XI News Live @footballxilive · 32,984 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 4 September 2026
EA SPORTS FC 26 @ea_fc26_news_fifa · 27,238 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 September 2026
Lionel Messi @Messi_lionel_uk · 52,169 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
🇬🇧Manchester United🇬🇧 @officialmanchester · 36,479 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 1 September 2026
Premier League @english_premier_league_links · 39,145 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 30 August 2026
ESPN FC @espnfc1 · 52,829 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 August 2026
Premier League @premier · 143,250 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
UEFA CHAMPIONS LEAGUE @uefa_champion_leaguee · 149,526 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
VETLAND SPORTS @vetland_sports_football1 · 109,194 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
Football @footballfactlys · 32,509 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
Sky Sports Football @Sky_Sportz_football · 66,145 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
Sky Sports World @sky_sports_world · 77,784 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 19 August 2026
CHELSEA MEDIA 🎥 @ChelseaFC_Media · 22,343 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 September 2026
Premier League 🦁 @PremierLeague_football · 25,695 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 September 2026
Here We Go Club @herewegoclub · 84,076 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
Arsenal | Gunners Update @gunners_update · 21,569 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 23 September 2026
⚽️ Chelsea Football Club 💙 @ChelseaFcWorldWide_001 · 121,712 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
LIVE SCORE MATCH @live_score_Cricket · 30,491 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 7 September 2026
PSG | Paris Saint-Germain @paris_saint_geermain · 30,133 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
MU central @Manchester_UtdCentral · 8 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
AMSICK TV😂❤️🎄🎅 @amsicktv · 40,921 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 11 September 2026
Chelsea @Chealsea · 32,883 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 79 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sky Sports News” (@skysport_football_official), 51,533 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/skysport_football_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.