Классная реклама прямых перелётов из Австралии в США
🔥62❤21🤩9

Channel
@believeinbrief
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,021subscribers
+18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001511106061 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @believeinbrief |
| Created | Between 1 July 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/believeinbrief |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:36 | 3,021 | +8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:28 | 3,013 | +6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 3,007 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 17:06 | 3,006 | +6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:56 | 3,000 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 2,997 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:31 | 3,003 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:42 | 3,003 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 4 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
846 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 337 | 39.8% | |
| 🔥 | 222 | 26.2% | |
| 🤩 | 89 | 10.5% | |
| 🏆 | 63 | 7.45% | |
| 😁 | 54 | 6.38% | |
| 💯 | 39 | 4.61% | |
| 👍 | 27 | 3.19% | |
| 💩 | 9 | 1.06% | |
| 🆒 | 4 | 0.473% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 0.236% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 846 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 4 March 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Классная реклама прямых перелётов из Австралии в США
🔥62❤21🤩9
Нашел тут в магазине интересую упаковку хлопьев. Что хотели сказать маркетологи, я не понял, но надеюсь, что батя в порядке! Хлопья решил не покупать…
😁19🤩8❤5🤬2
Кафе использовало выдачу из GPT для своей рекламы Ловко! Я сначала не поверил и сам вбил такой же запрос. И GPT тоже выдал мне это место!
🤩44🏆12🆒4❤2👍1
Zero screen time Классная реклама б/у IPod с площадки Black Market. Мы с вами видели из тренд-репортов, что растет интерес к аналоговым плеерам, фотокамерам и всему, что не требует подключение интернета. Да и в целом тренд на оффлайн только набирает обороты. Black Market это поняли и вышли с решением. Мне, конечно, до зероу скрин пока очень далеко. Сократить хотя бы до двух часов — уже будет достижение!
🔥28❤14🤩7👍2
Ребята, найдено средство для улучшения генераций!
😁28🤩9💯5💩2🔥2
Как в Канаде пытаются вернуть хоккей на улицы Дети в Канаде все меньше играют в хоккей на улице. Причин этому полно и одна из них — автомобильный трафик. Его стало много и просто раскатать на улице у своего дома порой становится опасно. Поэтому решили хакнуть навигационные приложения. Агентство разработало хоккейный мяч, который дает сигнал о том, что в месте, где он находится, большая пробка. И тогда навигатор ме…
❤11🔥6🏆3
Реклама Air Transat ⚽️🏆 Авиаперевозчик ловко использовал контекст чемпионата мира по футболу. Вместо того, чтобы покупать оверпрайснутые билеты на игры команд определенных стран, они предлагают просто полететь в эти страны (сильно дешевле). Я думаю, у бренда не стояла задача прям переубедить болельщиков лететь на футбол. Но точно стояла задача прокатиться на инфоповоде. Агентство: Courage
❤32🏆9👍7
IKEA FRAKTA ИКЕА классно прорекламировали свои иконичные сумки. А теперь представьте, если бы они все сделали наоборот: взяли сумку, напихали вещей для пляжа и сделали съемку сверху вниз. Зацепило бы? Не факт. Агентство: NoA | Åkestam Holst
❤39🔥12👍5
🚕 Вакансия в мою команду Middle copywriter в студию Magic Camp, Яндекс Go Пишите мне, если: 1️⃣ — у вас есть агентский или инхаус-опыт от 2 лет 2️⃣ — работали с премиум-сегментом и следите за коммуникациями модных брендов 3️⃣ — умеете не только хорошо придумывать, но и хорошо писать (в том числе в разных стилях с разными TOV) 4️⃣ — умеете работать с офлайном (btl, концепции ивентов, ambient) 5️⃣ — любите реклам…
🏆22❤14🤩5💩4🔥2
Сегодня 8 лет, как я работаю в Яндексе И вот 8 советов, которые первыми пришли мне в голову, когда я решил написать об этом пост 1. Любите работу, иначе работа перестанет любить вас 2. Не бойтесь задавать вопросы 3. Не бойтесь задавать тупые вопросы 4. Пробуйте войти в роль людей, которые ставят задачи 5. Не пускайте на самотек 6. Предлагайте больше, чем от вас ожидают 7. Сначала думайте, потом делайте. Не наоборот…
🔥65💯34❤31🏆9👍3💩3
Ловко! Пытаюсь вспомнить, есть ли бренды в России, бренд ассеты и креативные рамки которых способны сделать такой лаконичный макет. Может вы знаете?
❤25🔥8🤩5
Сегодня к нам в Яндекс Go вышли два стажера-копирайтера! Ребята прошли школу креатива Яндекса и вот оказались на 46 этаже одной из башен Сити. Теперь их ждет три месяца погружения в бренды, активная работа и кто его знает, чем всё закончится! Я, кстати, и сам попал в мир рекламы через стажировку в BBDO. Причем в первый раз мне отказали, сославшись на отстутствие столов (теперь я их прекрасно понимаю 😁). Меня поста…
❤65🔥19👍8
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @believeinbrief. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“believe in brief” (@believeinbrief), 3,021 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/believeinbrief.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.