Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 89 days, net -183. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,575–6,812 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 08:56
6,602
-2
1 Nov 2026, 18:08
6,604
-3
29 Oct 2026, 11:28
6,607
-7
26 Oct 2026, 14:28
6,614
-6
23 Oct 2026, 19:18
6,620
-4
20 Oct 2026, 20:59
6,624
-6
17 Oct 2026, 14:28
6,630
-2
15 Oct 2026, 01:09
6,632
-3
11 Oct 2026, 11:39
6,635
-14
5 Oct 2026, 06:22
6,649
-15
26 Sept 2026, 13:20
6,664
-15
17 Sept 2026, 13:59
6,679
-14
13 Sept 2026, 18:16
6,693
-11
10 Sept 2026, 08:40
6,704
-5
5 Sept 2026, 07:38
6,709
-4
1 Sept 2026, 19:53
6,713
-12
29 Aug 2026, 16:07
6,725
-6
26 Aug 2026, 08:26
6,731
-3
23 Aug 2026, 13:07
6,734
-14
20 Aug 2026, 00:27
6,748
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 26 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
443
Videos
159
Links
10
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
2m 03s
Average length
1m 02s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
811 reactions across 11 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
308
38.0%
❤
307
37.9%
🤯
48
5.92%
😁
34
4.19%
👍
28
3.45%
👌
27
3.33%
🎄
20
2.47%
💯
13
1.60%
🤣
7
0.863%
❤🔥
6
0.74%
🍾
6
0.74%
👀
4
0.493%
☃
2
0.247%
🥴
1
0.123%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 811 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 26 September 2025 to 5 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Так сложилось, что у меня оказалось более 15 свадебных платьев на руках.
И фаты и перчатки и даже парочка туфель.
Всё это абсолютно НОВОЕ
И я решила раздавать.
Раздавать тем, кто не может позволить приобрести сам себе свадебное платье.
А я точно знаю, что ВСЕ женщины мечтают быть принцессой в этот день 👰🤵♂️
Примерить можно в городе Горячий Ключ
Отправить в другой город я тоже могу.
Каталог платьев готовлю ❤️
Пи…
Как Ведьмы создали Первомай 🚩💐
Да-да, почти всё, что мы знаем и празднуем, имеет глубокие-глубокие корни.
Кельты, славяне, германцы и еще многие народы праздновали в ночь с 30 апреля на 1 мая начало земледельческой поры.
Праздновали, по тем временам, классически и обыденно: жгли костры, бухали, плясали и активно занимались сексом на полях, веря, что, как и женщина, земля «рожает».
Типа, посмотрит чернозём на кекс ч…
С Новым годом, мои хорошие! Путь наступивший год будет лучше, ярче, счастливее.
Пусть он принесёт вам ТОЛЬКО радость. Люблю вас. Растите, живите, дышите полной грудью. Ваша Белка и семья.
В Древнем Египте проколотый пупок указывал на то, что его обладатель — свободный гражданин.
При этом, долгое время, свободным гражданином являлись только фараон и его жена (дети богов)
Все остальные считались подданными фараона - его «рабами», и за пирсинг пупка их казнили. Прямо насмерть. Прям совсем-совсем насмерть.
Со временем дырявить пупок разрешили всей семье фараона и особо приближенным жрецам.
Остальной лю…
Пришла и моя пора высказаться на счет «Дракулы» Люка Бессона. Он же «Дракула 2025»
Сразу скажу, что параллелей с «Дракулой 1992» даже не собиралась проводить. Шла за новой картинкой, за новым взглядом.
А в итоге моё резюме:
О - отстой.
«Носферату»
+ «Парфюмер»
+ «Красавица и чудовище»
+ «Чарли и шоколадная фабрика»
Встряхнуть, но не перемешивать (с)
Я шла рыдать над любовной линией и восхищаться масштабными съе…
❤43👌25💯13
Signed Мария Belka_v_pole
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @belkaVpole. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как в прежние времена в русской армии назывался военный уборщик?
Проходимец41%
Сосунок14%
Прохвост38%
Молокосос7%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 26 September 2025 to 5 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ЕВМЦентр Екатерины Маденко @ekaterinamadenko · 28,774 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 8 September 2026
Та самая Ksuuuuu @ksuuuuu_govorit · 21,474 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 22 September 2026
Доктор Крис @doktor_kris · 55,319 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Белка в поле, Belka_v_pole” (@belkaVpole), 6,602 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/belkaVpole.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.