Channel
@best_stories
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
25,449subscribers
+275 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001002048970 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @best_stories |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/best_stories |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 25,449 | +21 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 14:38 | 25,428 | -5 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:41 | 25,433 | +25 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 03:37 | 25,408 | +21 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 17:57 | 25,387 | +22 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 08:55 | 25,365 | +8 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 25,357 | +33 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:57 | 25,324 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:12 | 25,323 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 25,327 | +28 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 25,299 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 25,300 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:54 | 25,299 | -10 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 25,309 | +16 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:08 | 25,293 | +3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 25,290 | +9 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 25,281 | +7 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 25,274 | +6 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:29 | 25,268 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 25,269 | first reading |
76 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 22 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 76 (11 July 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 5,903 |
| Reactions total | 14 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
215 reactions across 28 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 96.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 208 | 96.7% | |
| 👎 | 7 | 3.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 76 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 215 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 76 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#تیکه_کتاب آزادی، مثل آب، مثل هوا، مثل نان برای انسان واجب است؛ امّا انسان باید آب را برای فرونشاندنِ تشنگی بخواهد نه خود را غرق کردن در آن، و هوا را برای تنفّس بخواهد نه برای آلودنِ آن و مسموم کردنِ آدمیزاد، و نان را برای سیر کردنِ شکم، نه نهادن و کپکزده کردن و دور ریختن. آزادی باید مایهٔ خوشبختیِ آدمها باشد نه اسباب بدبختیِ آنها. پس آنچه که بدبخت میکند یقین بدانید که آزادی نیست، چیزیست شبیه آزادی. 📕 #سه_دی…
. . ≣ 4 کارمای مهم که بخشیده نمیشود.✦ 📎 پاکسازی کارما 📎 .
*آزادی بیجا* آخرهای تابستان یک عده را ول کردند. رئیس دلش نسوخته بود. رأفت هم در کار نبود. جا نبود. همین. یکیشان دم در، ساکش را انداخت کولش و چند قدمی رفت. ایستاد، نگاهی به خیابان کرد، نگاهی به در بستهی پشت سرش. گفت: «خداوکیلی ما رو تف کردن بیرون! وگرنه ما رو چه به آزادی؟» سر شب، ممد رفقا را توی پارک سر کوچه جمع کرد. چمنها هنوز از آفتاب روز گرم بودند. نشستند روی چمنها، دور یک سطل زباله که بوی ترشیدگی میداد. با ز…
. . ≣ پاکسازی رحم و قطع تار اتری ✦ 📎 کلیک کنید 📎 .
#جنتلمن_واقعی زمانی به آرامش میرسه تا به اهدافش برسه . و رازهای #موفقیت و ثروتمندی رو تو سینش نگاه میداره تا به اهدافش برسه ❌برای وارد شدن به دنیای موفقیت و #ثروتمندی فقط یک " کلیک "فاصله دارید. اگه میخوای رازهای ثروتمندی رو بدونی. پس زمان رو از دست نده و #زندگیه_جادویت رو بساز 👇👇👇👇 https://t.me/+fLUJkJ0rG7ViNTc0 https://t.me/+fLUJkJ0rG7ViNTc0
#تیکه_کتاب مرد آهسته در گوش فرزند تازه به بلوغ رسیدهاش برای پند چنین نجوا کرد: "پسرم در زندگی هرگز دزدی نکن" پسر متعجب و مبهوت به پدر نگاه کرد بدین معنا که او هرگز دست کج نداشته! پدر به نگاه متعجب فرزند لبخندی زد و ادامه داد : در زندگی دروغ نگو چرا که اگر گفتی صداقت را دزدیدهای ، خیانت نکن که اگر کردی عشق را دزدیدهای ، خشونت نکن اگر کردی محبت را دزدیدهای ، ناحق نگو اگر گفتی حق را دزدیدهای ، بی حیایی نکن اگر …
👍2
بعضی حافظهی عجیبی دارند. خوبیها را فراموش میکنند، بدیها را آرشیو! قیمتها بالا رفتند. من هم رفتم بالا. از دیوار! خرید هم خریدهای قدیم. الان فقط بازدید از اجناس است. گفتم دخل و خرج را ببرم گوشهای آشتی بدهم، خرج نیامد! #قاضی
👍1
. . ≣ پاکسازی بدن از انرژی های منفی، ترس، افسردگی و بیماری 📎 کلیک کنید 📎 .
📢 توجه: این کانال جدیدا خیلی تو فضای مجازی سر و صدا کرده. 👈اگر میخوای افکارت زیرو رو شه و به آرامش و موفقیت برسی بیا تو. 👇👇👇👇👇 @ghodratezehneservtmand @ghodratezehneservtmand
. . ≣ کارما چیست؟ چگونه کارمای اجدادی را پاکسازی کنیم؟ ✦ 📎 کلیک کنید 📎 .
#داستان_کوتاه 📖راههای رسیدن به خدا یک روز صبح «بودا» در بین شاگردانش نشسته بود که مردی به جمع آنان نزدیک شد و پرسید: آیا خدا وجود دارد؟ «بودا» پاسخ داد: بله، خدا وجود دارد. بعد از ناهار سروکلهی مرد دیگری پیدا شد که پرسید: آیا خدا وجود دارد؟ «بودا» پاسخ داد: نه، خدا وجود ندارد. اواخر روز مرد سومی همین سؤال را از «بودا» پرسید. پاسخ بودا به او چنین بود: خودت باید این را برای خودت روشن کنی. یکی از شاگردان گفت: استاد…
عشق نقطهای فروزان است و بس، با این حال بهنظر میآید میتواند کل زمان را تسخیر کند. تا همین چند روز پیش اصلاً عشقی وجود نداشت، چندی دیگر نیز عشقی وجود نخواهد داشت؛ اما تا زمانی که هست، پرتویش را بر روی گذشته و بر روی آیندهای که پس از عشق فراخواهد رسید، میتاباند. 📕 آدُلف ✍️ #بنژامن_کنستان
Showing the 12 most recent of 76 posts we hold for @best_stories. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@best_stories edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“❄️ بهشت” (@best_stories), 25,449 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/best_stories.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.