Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for БЛС | Без Лишних Слов

Channel

БЛС | Без Лишних Слов

@bez_ls

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

36,885subscribers

-95 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001669525691
TypeChannel
Username@bez_ls
DescriptionСотрудничество - @IamWordless (если пишете не по сотрудничеству - бан) № 4981824011
Created4 May 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bez_ls

Growth

36,88537,07136,9787 August 2026 — 36,980 subscribers7 August 2026 — 36,980 subscribers7 August 2026 — 36,983 subscribers8 August 2026 — 36,991 subscribers9 August 2026 — 37,030 subscribers10 August 2026 — 37,064 subscribers12 August 2026 — 37,069 subscribers13 August 2026 — 37,066 subscribers14 August 2026 — 37,067 subscribers16 August 2026 — 37,071 subscribers17 August 2026 — 37,057 subscribers18 August 2026 — 37,047 subscribers19 August 2026 — 37,030 subscribers20 August 2026 — 37,023 subscribers21 August 2026 — 37,007 subscribers22 August 2026 — 36,992 subscribers24 August 2026 — 36,946 subscribers25 August 2026 — 36,941 subscribers26 August 2026 — 36,919 subscribers27 August 2026 — 36,917 subscribers28 August 2026 — 36,905 subscribers29 August 2026 — 36,885 subscribers7 August 202629 August 2026
22 measurements spanning 22 days, net -95. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,857–37,099 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 08:0536,885-20
28 Aug 2026, 06:2236,905-12
27 Aug 2026, 05:1636,917-2
26 Aug 2026, 05:3736,919-22
25 Aug 2026, 06:2236,941-5
24 Aug 2026, 04:0736,946-46
22 Aug 2026, 12:4836,992-15
21 Aug 2026, 05:0237,007-16
20 Aug 2026, 08:1337,023-7
19 Aug 2026, 11:0737,030-17
18 Aug 2026, 13:3737,047-10
17 Aug 2026, 12:3537,057-14
16 Aug 2026, 04:0337,071+4
14 Aug 2026, 14:2737,067+1
13 Aug 2026, 03:0437,066-3
12 Aug 2026, 02:4537,069+5
10 Aug 2026, 23:4137,064+34
9 Aug 2026, 20:5337,030+39
8 Aug 2026, 17:3236,991+8
7 Aug 2026, 19:3736,983first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.2%
avg views ÷ 36,885 subscribers
Avg views / post
16,700
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held40 (25 July 202629 August 2026)
Views total550,380
Reactions total28,303
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,950
Videos
61
Links
953

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

35,730 reactions across 40 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥10,60529.7%
💋8,92625.0%
🍌6,20017.4%
🙉5,23814.7%
🏆1,9905.57%
🤔9922.78%
😍6911.93%
🙊4361.22%
😎2730.764%
💊1760.493%
🤓1330.372%
👌700.196%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35,730reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
55
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 40 we hold a reading for · 38%
Most on one post
17
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bez_ls. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 40 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTC≈4,030 views254 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ANDERKNYAZ: НАЧАЛО КООПКА BURGLIN GNOMES ОТЕЦ ИГРАЕТ В ДЕТЕКТИВ МАУС ОЗВУЧКА МОМЕНТОВ ИЗ ФИЛЬМОВ ТЕСТЫ ПО МИНЬОНАМ 📱 СТРИМ БУДЕТ ДОЛГИМ

❤‍🔥219💋22🏆9🙉3🍌1

28 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC≈7,450 views411 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ВНИМАНИЕ - ЛЕЗИМ НА ГОРУ в PEAK И занимаемся всякой ерундистикой🤪 📱 КТО С ТГ ПИШИТЕ - Я ДОЛБАЕБ И ЕМ КАЛЛ

🍌304❤‍🔥63💊35💋6👌3

25 Aug 2026, 15:36 UTC≈10,800 views630 reactions2 Starsread 29 August 2026

ЭТО ABSOLUTE BLEBEBE🏆 📱 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DlZNPVZtIcI

🍌424❤‍🔥134🏆49😎17🙉6

25 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC≈11,600 views406 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🍎БЛЕБЕРУНДА??? 📱 ПОГНАЛИ ТВИЧИТЬ

🍌316💋57👌25🙉4🙊4

23 Aug 2026, 11:56 UTC≈13,900 views797 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🏆МАЙНКРАФТ ИНТЕРНЕШНЛ 16:00 Аывда? 📱 СТРИМ ИДЕТ

💋628🍌97🙊56👌14🙉2

22 Aug 2026, 21:08 UTC≈13,100 views1,169 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026

кстати я дипломированный компьютерщик 👅

💋881🍌136🤓113❤‍🔥26🙉13

22 Aug 2026, 21:06 UTC≈13,000 views1,281 reactions2 Starsread 29 August 2026
Photo

это пиздец господа... я 4 с хуем года сидел с топовым железом, работал монтажером, стримил и тд. но при этом сидел в играх с вертикальной синхронизацией на 170 фпс, ибо больше чета комп слабо вытягивал. и я думал, что все кто сидят с 500 фпс просто жестко все оптимизируют и мне оно не надо. но у меня за пк посидел брат и сказал что он у меня говно и в кс даже у него 500 фпс, когда у меня до 200 не доходит. я решил

🏆1,010💋140🙊85❤‍🔥34🤓12

19 Aug 2026, 10:43 UTC≈17,800 views1,575 reactions3 Starsread 29 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ОФИЦИАЛЬНО - Теперь ко мне надо обращаться, как Мистер Ютубер 😎

🙉1,070❤‍🔥339🍌118😎39🤔9

14 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC≈26,200 views656 reactions2 Starsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Спустя 8 месяцев дропаем 2 часть новогоднего влога на бусти 😎 📱 https://boosty.to/bez_ls

🙉480❤‍🔥118😍47🤔6🤓5

14 Aug 2026, 12:28 UTC≈21,300 views430 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

📱 СМОТРИМ ГАДКИЙ Я 4 ВПЕРВЫЕ

❤‍🔥326🍌59🤔29👌10💋6

14 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC≈21,400 views407 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Доброе утро всем, продолжаем играть😘

😍292❤‍🔥62💋39🍌14

13 Aug 2026, 22:43 UTC≈20,900 views541 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

😳 Решил перед сном посмотреть фильм детства, кто хочет залетайте. А кто спать ушел, жду вас утром, день начнем с миньонов 📱

🍌402❤‍🔥96🤔29💋11😎3

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @bez_ls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 156,896 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Алфедов - грызёт сосульки
@alfedovgroup · 66,957
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 27 August 2026
PWGood
@pwgood · 80,790
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 18 August 2026
Obsidian Time
@obsitgroup · 56,734
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 23 August 2026
Майни
@mayniyt · 67,810
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 August 2026
ШАДИК 🇷🇺
@shadik_ru · 84,093
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 25 August 2026
🤿Неркин
@nerkinboat · 74,464
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 19 August 2026
Заквиель / Zakviel
@ZakvielChannel · 64,286
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 21 August 2026
ГАВЕР
@g4v3r · 71,768
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 20 August 2026
FeelBro
@FeeelBro · 49,085
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 26 August 2026
МайнШилд | Ваше творчество
@mineshield_arts · 42,629
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 29 August 2026
Павук (swag)
@pavuk228 · 42,687
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 29 August 2026
L1K3R
@L1k3rr · 86,534
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 18 August 2026
Майнкрафт+
@minecraftapp · 71,065
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 29 August 2026
Архименеджер Разъясняет
@rebirther_ask · 121,314
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 13 August 2026
Лололошка ФУ НОВОСТИ
@LololoshkaUSE · 514,432
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 9 August 2026
Корова из майнкрафта / Бурёночек
@Burenochek · 45,525
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 27 August 2026
MyNeosha👽
@myneosha · 86,481
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 18 August 2026
TheRudyGames
@therudygroup · 43,886
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 28 August 2026
Joe Speen
@joe_speen_youtube · 184,431
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“БЛС | Без Лишних Слов” (@bez_ls), 36,885 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bez_ls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.