Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ШАДИК 🇷🇺

Channel

ШАДИК 🇷🇺

@shadik_ru

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

84,162subscribers

+775 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002135829845
TypeChannel
Username@shadik_ru
DescriptionДля публичных постов Дискорд сервер для общения: https://discord.gg/gVGyAgehfb Канал с бредятиной: https://t.me/shadik69 Cвязаться со мной: @shadik_contact
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/shadik_ru

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

71,200 average views per post against 84,162 subscribers — an engagement rate of 84.6%. Across the 8,384 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,624–99,993 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.08% and 21.1%, with a median of 10.5%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (23 August 2026 22 September 2026)
Posts measured19 of 19 published in the window (0 exact, 19 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled1,352,700
Mature posts only92.5% over 17 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers84,162 measured 17 September 2026
Cohortb31623:rus · 8,384 channels · p10 2.53% · p25 5.08% · p50 10.5% · p75 21.1% · p90 35.7%
Position in cohort99.499th percentile · 8.0× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.031% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 22 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

83,38784,29583,8417 August 2026 — 83,387 subscribers8 August 2026 — 83,389 subscribers9 August 2026 — 83,415 subscribers10 August 2026 — 83,432 subscribers11 August 2026 — 83,472 subscribers12 August 2026 — 83,529 subscribers13 August 2026 — 83,537 subscribers14 August 2026 — 83,525 subscribers16 August 2026 — 83,578 subscribers17 August 2026 — 83,609 subscribers18 August 2026 — 83,648 subscribers19 August 2026 — 83,742 subscribers20 August 2026 — 83,707 subscribers21 August 2026 — 83,712 subscribers23 August 2026 — 83,710 subscribers24 August 2026 — 83,645 subscribers25 August 2026 — 83,649 subscribers26 August 2026 — 83,706 subscribers28 August 2026 — 83,848 subscribers28 August 2026 — 84,093 subscribers29 August 2026 — 84,215 subscribers30 August 2026 — 84,240 subscribers31 August 2026 — 84,225 subscribers1 September 2026 — 84,202 subscribers2 September 2026 — 84,144 subscribers4 September 2026 — 84,110 subscribers6 September 2026 — 84,143 subscribers10 September 2026 — 84,171 subscribers12 September 2026 — 84,230 subscribers13 September 2026 — 84,292 subscribers15 September 2026 — 84,295 subscribers17 September 2026 — 84,162 subscribers84,1627 August 202617 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 41 days, net +775. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 83,251–84,431 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 15:5784,162-133
15 Sept 2026, 15:1884,295+3
13 Sept 2026, 21:5884,292+62
12 Sept 2026, 05:5984,230+59
10 Sept 2026, 01:5984,171+28
6 Sept 2026, 17:1584,143+33
4 Sept 2026, 04:1984,110-34
2 Sept 2026, 17:4484,144-58
1 Sept 2026, 19:4584,202-23
31 Aug 2026, 23:1784,225-15
30 Aug 2026, 19:3684,240+25
29 Aug 2026, 22:2884,215+122
28 Aug 2026, 22:3384,093+245
28 Aug 2026, 00:2483,848+142
26 Aug 2026, 22:1283,706+57
25 Aug 2026, 21:2383,649+4
24 Aug 2026, 22:4683,645-65
23 Aug 2026, 07:0783,710-2
21 Aug 2026, 19:3883,712+5
20 Aug 2026, 14:2283,707first reading

Engagement

43 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 102 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
84.6%
avg views ÷ 84,162 subscribers
Avg views / post
71,200
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 43 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held43 (9 July 202622 September 2026)
Views total1,352,700
Reactions total21,823
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Sept 2026, 14:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
638
Videos
23
Links
189

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 13s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

57,770 reactions across 43 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
34,83060.3%
🔥10,85118.8%
👍5,6659.81%
🍾1,5842.74%
🥰1,0171.76%
🫡9731.68%
🌭9171.59%
🤪6281.09%
🍓5440.942%
👎4680.81%
🤝1710.296%
💅1220.211%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57,770 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2,661
across the posts below
Posts paid on
40
of 43 we hold a reading for · 93%
Most on one post
338
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shadik_ru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 43 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 July 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Sept 2026, 08:15 UTC≈13,300 views598 reactions2 Starsread 22 September 2026
Forwarded from @shadik69Photo

Придумал гениальное название для нового сна в ХК 🙂

498👍40🔥37🍓8🤪7🥰4🫡4

21 Sept 2026, 08:55 UTC≈25,400 views949 reactions273 Starsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Пам-па-рррааам🚶‍♀️

837🥰52🔥35👍8🌭5🍓5👎4🤝3

19 Sept 2026, 15:02 UTC≈32,800 views441 reactions5 Starsread 22 September 2026
Photo

✋ Просто дружеское напоминание, что у меня есть дискорд сервер, где мы пьём пивасик и занимаемся всякими преколами. Приходите, приглашайте туда своих родителей, соседей, собак и котов! 😼 📱: https://discord.gg/gVGyAgehfb

👍33172💅10🌭8🥰8👎6🤪5🫡1

17 Sept 2026, 08:49 UTC≈53,400 views622 reactions4 Starsread 22 September 2026
Photo

❤️ Опппа, да это же фан-артики! Авторам как всегда респект и увлажнение! 👅 Автор (1): https://t.me/TNRVOR Автор (2): @Aksssii Автор (3): https://t.me/lyniiiay Автор (4,5): https://t.me/ziroporno Автор (6): https://t.me/palechnik Автор (7): https://t.me/nervniecats 🍓 Если хотите тоже прислать свои фан-арты, то пишите мне в лс — @shadik_contact 🩷

495👍52🍓27🔥22🥰10🌭5🍾5👎3

16 Sept 2026, 05:51 UTC≈51,100 views1,093 reactions7 Starsread 22 September 2026
Photo

🥰

🔥869127🍓44🫡21👍12🍾10🌭8👎2

9 Sept 2026, 16:29 UTC≈86,100 views2,279 reactions17 Starsread 22 September 2026
Photo

Не канон, но для одного верного подписчика, который плотно задонатил на это — Фута Алекс с Херобриншей

1,720🔥175🫡135👎88👍51🤪42🌭35🥰13

7 Sept 2026, 05:39 UTC≈99,200 views1,100 reactions140 Starsread 22 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

🍾793150👍32🫡29🌭22🔥19🤪14🍓12

7 Sept 2026, 05:39 UTC≈93,500 views989 reactions18 Starsread 22 September 2026
Photo

🌐 С днём публичной обновы, шахтёры! Не забудьте нафармить опыта и зачарить свои инструменты, люблю 💗 🗄: https://disk.yandex.ru/d/Q-TILYI8lw9HBw

752🔥64🫡54🍾34🌭19🥰18🤝13👍12

3 Sept 2026, 12:02 UTC≈84,900 views555 reactions47 Starsread 22 September 2026
Forwarded from @beltomnsfwVideo

Мечта 😡

489🥰24🔥20👍12👎5🌭3💅1🤝1

3 Sept 2026, 12:00 UTC≈82,600 views906 reactions52 Starsread 22 September 2026

Я календарь

717👍58🫡54👎35🍾14🔥13💅6🍓4

2 Sept 2026, 05:25 UTC≈68,600 views1,580 reactions8 Starsread 16 September 2026
Photo

Ну и ну, что ж творится... 🤔

1,300🤪145🥰38🫡31🌭16👎14🔥13👍12

31 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC≈85,800 views1,245 reactions316 Starsread 16 September 2026
Photo

🌐 Сегодня версия 0.33 становится доступна для Платиновых и Золотых подписчиков! Ура! 4 Сентября доступ получат Серебряные подписчики, 6 Сентября — Бронзовые, а публично для всех обнова станет доступна 7 Сентября! 🤩 Список изменений: Обновление 0.33: Чешуйница (ветка мутации): - Добавлена сцена «Всё ближе к цели» - Добавлена сцена «Ради результата» Собака: - Добавлена сцена «Гулять, гулять, гулять!» - Добавлена сце

1,020🔥69👍65👎37🤪19🌭9🍓9🍾5

Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @shadik_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Шадятина³⁰ˣ⁴⁰
@shadik69 · 6,663
#1
ФУЛ от мега мозга
@full1211 · 5,576
#2
МайнШилд | Ваше творчество
@mineshield_arts · 41,927
#3
TEIRO
@TEIRO_official · 1,641
#4
FMDZP 🐉
@themisterkaktus · 26,732
#5
Derzko69
@gigaderzko69 · 231,104
#6
Заквиель / Zakviel
@ZakvielChannel · 63,533
#7
Зорген — и точка💊 [LanceR Hard]
@lancertgme · 20,122
#8
SHAPKA
@rushizik · 133,362
#9
БЛС | Без Лишних Слов
@bez_ls · 36,503
#10
BRAINDEAD PROJECT [BDP]
@braindeadproject · 21,836
#11
Лололошка ФУ НОВОСТИ
@LololoshkaUSE · 514,948
#12
FeelBro
@FeeelBro · 48,469
#13
Архименеджер Разъясняет
@rebirther_ask · 117,807
#14
4ch
@why4ch · 1,045,447
#15
Пекарня
@pekagame · 1,091,300
#16
Винди31🤝
@windy31room · 541,748
#17
sndk
@sndkgram · 357,088
#18
nerds
@nerds · 415,438
#19
Подвал Стинта
@thestint · 264,709
#20
ПРЕПОД STEAM | ВСЁ ПРО ИГРЫ НА ПК
@prepodsteam · 282,133
#21
Brawl Stars Datamines | BSD
@bsdatamines · 449,794
#22
FEYADA | The Blood Diary | Heart of the Bunker | Heroes Saga | Knightly Passions
@feyada_off · 3,515
#23
KotaMota Games
@kotamotaclub · 38,382
#24
ST Live
@storyteamlive · 63,107
#25
НЕ ПЯТЁРКА
@NE_5OPKA · 29,234
#26
LonaRPG RUS
@lonarpg · 45,509
#27
LINE
@lineisha · 96,562
#28
Камыш размышляет
@cane_reflects · 58,118
#29
Фордел
@frdll_yt · 33,574
#30
комната EDIT
@MrLololoshka_EDIT · 82,838
#31
🤿Неркин
@nerkinboat · 74,408
#32
Каргас
@kargacc · 99,307
#33
Silero News (озвучка, текст в голос).
@silero_voice_news · 844,666
#34
Петля Джоунси / Новости Фортнайт
@FortLoop · 100,277
#35
KyDaNeSeTDbIM
@mult_ashki · 28,116
#36
Lololoshka/Лололошка|Мастерская 47
@MrLololoshka_lol · 37,608
#37
Бэбэй
@bebeychick · 91,213
#38
Зио
@zio402 · 44,865
#39
PvZ Дичь!
@PvZ_Dich · 56,212
#40
Lololoshka | Мастерская [47]
@Lololoshka_lovelyy · 26,698
#41
Голоса в голове MellShera 🥵🔪
@mellsher · 52,120
#42
Новости Лайна
@linenews1 · 25,154
#43
3акр0ма ТайRuri
@tairuri · 1,302 (as read 25 August 2026)
#44
lilsemmi :₽
@lil1semmi · 17,698
#45
Алежа Обухов
@alezhao · 245,016
#46
Свежая Булдка
@buldj · 86,022
#47
Майзенберг
@meizzenberg · 41,906
#48
Нулс Бравл | Нуллс
@nulls_ru · 631,126
#49
Soderling
@soderlingoc · 92,988
#50
Mobimes - мобильные игры
@mobi_mes · 393,197
#51
Мир Supercell
@mir_supercell · 2,588,028
#52
5opka - МЕМЫ
@mem5goda · 30,001
#53
🔸🔶Quickly_Done🔶🔸
@Quickly_done16 · 4,546
#54

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

LonaRPG RUS
@lonarpg · 45,509
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 27 August 2026
FeelBro
@FeeelBro · 48,469
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 26 August 2026
Подслушано Stalzone
@stalzonereport · 50,630
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ШАДИК 🇷🇺” (@shadik_ru), 84,162 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shadik_ru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.