Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
«پاکتِچالشها»
@bigrilcring
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004478903375 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bigrilcring |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bigrilcring |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Oct 2026, 02:22 | 2 | no change |
| 6 Oct 2026, 01:47 | 2 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 1 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1505.9%
- avg views ÷ 2 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 30.1
- 17 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.03%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 18
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (1 October 2026 – 4 October 2026) |
| Views total | 512 |
| Reactions total | 11 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Oct 2026, 02:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 47
- Videos
- 5
- Links
- 115
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
11 reactions across 11 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍓 | 11 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 October 2026 to 4 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
اینجوری تقریبا
⚠️ TW: Sexual Content Human Ashtray زیرسیگاری انسانی به عملی اشاره میکنه که توش پارتنر بهعنوان شیئی کارکردی برای نگهداشتن خاکستر، دریافت تهسیگار یا نقطهٔ دورریز در طول سیگار کشیدن استفاده میشه. توضیح اضافهای ندارم، لزوما قرار نیست فقط اینجوری باشه.. شامل سیگار کشیدن حین رابطه، خاموش کردن سیگار روی بدن پارتنر هم میشه ولی خطرات زیادی به همراه داره. https://t.me/MyFuckinDrugStore
🍓1
⚠️ TW: Sexual Content Ice Play آیسپلی یه حرکت حسیعه که از سرما به علت حس تیزی که داره، به عنوان محرک استفاده میکنن، مثل مالیدن معکبهای یخ، اشیاء منجمد به پوست. (دخول هم میشه کرد..) کمخطرتر و در دسترستره. https://t.me/imtou_1087
🍓1
⚠️ TW: Sexual Content and blood Knife Play اینو باید بدون کلمه قلمبه سلمبه توضحی بدم.. ببین اینکار اول امنیت، مهارت و رضایت میخواد. چون بله از اسمش معلومه.. قراره با تیغ، بدنت زخمی بشه. تنوع و گستردگی زیادی وجود داره براش ولی معمولا زخمهای کم عمق و فقط برای حس سوزش ایجاد میکنن و اینجوری نیست که خونریزی زیادی داشته باشه. جایگاه ویژهای داره توی کینگها چون جنبههای بصری هم داره. https://t.me/Aelissamaris
⚠️ TW: Sexual Content Wax Play عمل حسیعه که توش از موم شمع گرم برای ایجاد احساس گرما روی پوست استفاده میکنن.احساس ایجادشده میتونه از گرمای ملایم تا سوزش بیشتر متفاوت باشه. ظاهر موم و سفت شدن آن روی پوست برای بعضیها بخشی از جنبهی بصری این کاره. چیبگم دیگه... بله موم یا همون پارافین شمع آب میشه حالا یا با چکوندن یا ریختن، فانتزیای هست که ترکیب بشه جالبتر میشه، مثلا با محرومیت حسی :)) البته خطر سوختن هم دا…
🍓1
⚠️ TW: Sexual Content Suspension Bondage بانداج معلق شامل بلندکردن بدن بهطور جزئی یا کامل از زمین با طناب، زنجیر یا سایر چیزهای دیگست. این کارم خیلی خوشگل و جالبه با روبان دیدمش که انجام دادن، برای اینکه بهتر درکش کنی عکسش رو پایین میذارم تا متوجه بشی دقیقا چیه.. https://t.me/luvrnx
🍓1
⚠️ TW: Sexual Content Eye Contact Restriction محدودیت تماس چشمی عملیه که توش به باتم دستور داده میشه که از تماس چشمی مستقیم با تاپ پرهیز کنه. والا همه تاپها اینجورین که باید به چشمهام نگاه کنی ولی خب اینجا برعکسه:) البته ممکنه بگن که باید حتما به پایین نگاه کنه یا فقط بخش خاصی رو تماشا بکنه. https://t.me/her_mantreh
🍓1
⚠️ TW: Sexual Content Sensory Deprivation محرومیت حسی شامل محدودکردن عمدی یک یا چند حس، برای تشدید احساسات باقیماندهست. این کار آسیبپذیری عمیق ایجاد میکنه . رایجترینش شامل محدودکردن بینایی با چشمبند یا کلاه، محدودکردن شنوایی با گوشبند یا هدفون، یا کاهش لمس از طریق بانداج یا قرار دادن توی موقعیتهای خاصه. اینجا دیگه یه لمس کوچیک مثل شوک الکتریسیته میمونه یا یه زمزمه عمیق بشه چون از همه حسهای دیگه محرومی. مث…
🍓1
⚠️ TW: Sexual Content Decorative Bondage بانداج تزئینی هنر بصری رو با قدرت در مهار ترکیب میکنه و الگوها و طرحهایی میسازه که هم جذابیت زیباییشناختی و هم تجربهٔ روانی رو قوی میکنه:) آقا این خیلی جالبه و خوشگله جدی! صرفا برای کنترل کردن نیست، و بدن تبدیل میشه به بوم. و چون باتم مدت طولانیتری تحت سلطهست این کار جالبتر هم میشه. گرهها و تقارنهای قشنگی ایجاد میشه :) عکسش رو پایین میفرستم ببینی! https://t.me/t…
🍓1
⚠️ TW: Sexual Content Hair Bondage عملی که در آن از مو بهعنوان نقطهٔ کنترل، مهار یا دستکاری حسی، همراه با رضایت استفاده میشود. نمونه بارزش میشه موقع پوزیشن داگی موی طرف رو از پشت میگیرن و میکِشن سمت خودشون:)) بیشتر با افراد موی بلند میشه انجامش داد اما روشهای مختلفی داره. https://t.me/aloneselenophil
🍓1
⚠️ TW: Sexual Content Erotic Humiliation عملی رضایتمحور که در آن یک نفر از تحقیر، خجالتزده شدن یا کوچکشمرده شدن توسط اون یکی تحریک میشه. بخشی ازش میشه همون درتیتاک خودمون😃 https://t.me/Glass_mind
🍓1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @bigrilcring. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Heavenlyangelika · 672 postsᴡɪꜱᴛᴇʀɪᴀ
@Aelissamaris · 461 post𝑺𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒏𝒐𝒑𝒉𝒊𝒍𝒊𝒂
@aloneselenophil · 261 postChaos
@Glass_mind · 561 postTaranom's Mantreh🏳️🌈
@her_mantreh · 881 post|آبانِ بیخورشید|
@imtou_1087 · 661 post babygirl in control
@luvrnx · 1671 postKind of night creature
@MyFuckinDrugStore · 1231 postㅤ𝗃𔘓𝗅𝗅𝗒𝖿𝗂𝗌𝗁 ㅤ
@sulatyn · 1571 post 𝑎𝑛ֹֺֽ𝑔𓏲ּ𝄢⎯ꥇꥇּ𝑒𝑙
@tellmewu · 2571 postAKITO I FUCKING HATE YOU GO FUCK YOURSELF
@tiaxjul · 471 postΉλιος⨾
@WhiteandBlue0 · 311 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“«پاکتِچالشها»” (@bigrilcring), 2 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bigrilcring.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.