Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Musa

Channel

Musa

@binadam61

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,366subscribers

+167 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001426810877
TypeChannel
Username@binadam61
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 October 2026
Measurements held51
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/binadam61

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

12,14212,63712,389.57 August 2026 — 12,199 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,199 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,197 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,204 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,199 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,197 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,191 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,178 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,158 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,148 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,142 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,170 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,168 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,506 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,528 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,515 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,490 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,484 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,494 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,488 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,484 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,470 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,580 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,616 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,615 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,600 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,582 subscribers8 September 2026 — 12,545 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12,533 subscribers13 September 2026 — 12,632 subscribers14 September 2026 — 12,637 subscribers16 September 2026 — 12,623 subscribers18 September 2026 — 12,602 subscribers2 October 2026 — 12,550 subscribers7 October 2026 — 12,527 subscribers11 October 2026 — 12,518 subscribers14 October 2026 — 12,483 subscribers15 October 2026 — 12,477 subscribers16 October 2026 — 12,462 subscribers17 October 2026 — 12,459 subscribers18 October 2026 — 12,443 subscribers19 October 2026 — 12,433 subscribers20 October 2026 — 12,418 subscribers21 October 2026 — 12,419 subscribers22 October 2026 — 12,410 subscribers23 October 2026 — 12,408 subscribers24 October 2026 — 12,407 subscribers25 October 2026 — 12,395 subscribers26 October 2026 — 12,387 subscribers27 October 2026 — 12,378 subscribers28 October 2026 — 12,366 subscribers12,3667 August 202628 October 2026
51 measurements spanning 82 days, net +167. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,068–12,711 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 51
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Oct 2026, 20:2112,366-12
27 Oct 2026, 16:3812,378-9
26 Oct 2026, 17:5412,387-8
25 Oct 2026, 16:0912,395-12
24 Oct 2026, 12:4812,407-1
23 Oct 2026, 15:1712,408-2
22 Oct 2026, 17:4012,410-9
21 Oct 2026, 11:3612,419+1
20 Oct 2026, 11:5812,418-15
19 Oct 2026, 09:1112,433-10
18 Oct 2026, 09:1812,443-16
17 Oct 2026, 07:2112,459-3
16 Oct 2026, 06:3512,462-15
15 Oct 2026, 05:2712,477-6
14 Oct 2026, 00:4412,483-35
11 Oct 2026, 04:3812,518-9
7 Oct 2026, 00:2112,527-23
2 Oct 2026, 00:4112,550-52
18 Sept 2026, 14:1812,602-21
16 Sept 2026, 03:5812,623first reading

Engagement

379 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 379 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 36s
Average length
2m 48s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,002 reactions across 313 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,95559.1%
⚡60412.1%
🫡60112.0%
🐳3206.40%
👨‍💻2515.02%
❤2164.32%
🤝200.4%
👏190.38%
🙏90.18%
😎30.06%
🤷30.06%
🆒10.02%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 314 of the 379 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,002 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 379 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
18
across the posts below
Posts paid on
16
of 372 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @binadam61. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 379 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 16:17 UTC632 views11 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Market was against every trade today Loss: $500 🙂📉

🐳8👍2🫡1

2 Sept 2026, 11:47 UTC837 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Aped $Henderson https://pump.fun/callouts/3AT7vYXdpqMj5zpHQaicrdvfbmWZudpnmXYxRpMdpump/fb698bb2-7ee0-402c-8555-bf9d9849db10

👍2

2 Sept 2026, 05:37 UTC985 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Aped $CHUFFY 5K BP6vw9JJyBKLfURimVxepqjsFbWzEgXTrEejeBEfpump

⚡6

2 Sept 2026, 03:23 UTC≈1,010 views11 reactionsread 2 September 2026

You can use your SOL or USDC directly on pump.fun to trade You don’t need to download or migrate anything.

👍10⚡1

2 Sept 2026, 02:47 UTC≈1,000 views20 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Moving into Robinhood Be prepared We are not leaving SOL

👍15⚡5

2 Sept 2026, 02:23 UTC982 viewsread 2 September 2026

Aped $Samurai J1WmhHdJSzEQbFZpQD2NhjUqrcQMJW69puVZ7RrMpump

Showing the 12 most recent of 379 posts we hold for @binadam61. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Modern Crypto calls
@moderncryptoanalyst · 26,105
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 September 2026
Salisu D Crypto
@salsdcrpt · 33,359
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 1 September 2026
Aminu Crypto Labs
@AminuCryptoLabs · 119,684
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
AREWA STRIVERS
@arewastrivers · 172,018
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
Brains Signals 𓃵
@brainssignals · 26,804
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 September 2026
airdropshausachannel
@AirdropsHausaChannel · 195
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 24 September 2026
SCTv Africa
@Sunusicryptotv · 56,045
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 August 2026
WAZOBIA CRYPTO
@wazobiacryptoo · 75,088
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 August 2026
Crypto love Academy
@cryptoloveacademychannel · 19,058
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 October 2026
GRINDER'S CORNER
@grinderscorner · 133,867
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 September 2026
Arewa Trading Academy
@arewatradingacademyO1 · 52,750
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 August 2026
Whitetiger Siginal Group
@alaminfreesiginal · 38,219
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
D LEGEND’S ALPHA
@LegendsAlphas · 19,427
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 1 October 2026
Sea of Satoshi 💧(CTO)
@sea_of_satoshi · 31,631
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 4 September 2026
XM Trading Academy
@ahmedfreesignals · 303,056
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Musa” (@binadam61), 12,366 subscribers as measured 28 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/binadam61.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.