🔥 UPDATE ON $ITLG ALLOCATION REQUIREMENT The requirements have been adjusted and are now relatively easier to meet. Previously, ITLG was allocated to accounts with a high account score plus KYC L1, L2, and L3. Now, the requirements are simply KYC Step 1 and a steady mining rate. This means that KYC L1 is a critical step to ensure eligibility for ITLG allocation as a Linker. If you are yet to complete KYC L1, th…

Channel
GRINDER'S CORNER
@grinderscorner
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
136,049subscribers
-7,208 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002035992800 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @grinderscorner |
| Description | Elevate your skills & income simultaneously in the dynamic world of web3. For enquiry or calls contacts t.me/Deeilus 👇 https://x.com/dee_e6 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 37 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/grinderscorner |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 00:15 | 136,049 | -467 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 13:36 | 136,516 | -900 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 08:58 | 137,416 | -613 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 13:55 | 138,029 | -283 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 23:16 | 138,312 | -235 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 23:00 | 138,547 | -141 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 12:22 | 138,688 | -247 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:36 | 138,935 | -249 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:01 | 139,184 | -407 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 18:38 | 139,591 | -219 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:15 | 139,810 | -177 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:48 | 139,987 | -159 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:37 | 140,146 | -89 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 140,235 | -126 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 140,361 | -110 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:13 | 140,471 | -82 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 140,553 | -171 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 10:14 | 140,724 | -58 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:42 | 140,782 | -157 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:43 | 140,939 | first reading |
Engagement
172 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 133 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.077%
- avg views ÷ 136,049 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 105
- 54 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.01%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 55
- of 172 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 54 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 172 (1 August 2026 – 9 October 2026) |
| Views total | 5,659 |
| Reactions total | 35 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Oct 2026, 11:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,070
- Videos
- ≈212
- Links
- ≈4,840
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 16m 03s
- Average length
- 4m 01s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
104 reactions across 48 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 67 | 64.4% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 16.3% | |
| 🤣 | 8 | 7.69% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 4.81% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 1.92% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 1.92% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 1.92% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.962% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 172 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 104 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 172 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 9 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 168 we hold a reading for · 0.6%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @grinderscorner. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 172 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 9 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Free $30K From Sui Network 🚨Even if you didn’t attend Basecamp, you can still participate in the creators challenge: So, @SuiNetwork is giving creators a chance to win from a $30,000 prize pool across 8 categories for covering Sui Basecamp 2026. Get started here: content.buildonsui.io Proceed to look for the categories you fit in, publish your content on the listed platforms and submit the link, then wait for the…
🔥 THIS IS MASSIVE $4.5 Trillion JP Morgan helped Solana develop a program that will settle institutional trades in seconds $1000 SOL is coming this cycle
Compiled some images from friends who have Connected Web @RevenueFamily The project demands to take the entire Wallet Phase Withdrawing money is not possible =)) WARNING ‼️‼️‼️‼️
If you’re a content creator, I have a new platform for you that you can build on. It’s a new platform and I am sure you will be big on it if you’re serious with your contents. It’s good to be early you know ✌️
❤1
Signed Wealth YemTop
Go claim wl asap Link: https://quests.deuslaunch.com/?ref=dee_e6 Free mint wl and hyped Low supply Do asap and submit wallet
❤1
🚨 CREATOR ALPHA: $7,500 REWARD POOL @0xhazels just opened a creator campaign where the final leaderboard pays out across the Top 100. 💰 $7,500 USDT total pool 🏆 100 creators get rewarded 🟢 Starts: Oct 2, 17:00 UTC 🔴 Ends: Nov 3, 00:00 UTC Here’s how the rewards are split: 🥇 1st — $600 🥈 2nd — $450 🥉 3rd — $300 4th — $200 5th–10th — $100 each 11th–25th — $90 each 26th–50th — $60 each 51st–100th — $50 each https:…
❤2
📍STEP 4: Add Liquidity • Go to: testnet.qwap.xyz/explore/pools • Choose any pool • Add liquidity • Check your position here: testnet.qwap.xyz/portfolio 📍STEP 5: Extra Tasks • Send a small QMS transfer to another address you control • Join QMS Discord + get the available roles: discord.com/invite/qmsnetw… • Join QWAP Discord: discord.gg/qwapofficial • Grab the Qwapper / Qwabbit roles • Drop useful feedback in Disco…
🃏QMS Testnet Full Guide @QMSNetwork is an EVM L1 built for the post-quantum era 💰 $0 required ⌛ Takes ~5–10 mins what I find bullish about it: ✅ Quantum resistance is a problem most chains will have to solve eventually. QMS is building for it from day one instead of patching it in later. 👉 The official docs state that “active testers may be considered for future community programs.” Here’s how to get started 👇 …
Revenue look scammy don't connect wallet stay clear guys @RevenueFamily Don't click the link on their site
👍3
got $48 free revenue for my profile check the amount of revenue for yours - visit: https://revenue.family/?ref=6CNGN5 - check with your X profile - complete task & claim - Like & Repost https://x.com/dee_e6/status/2105543218741813438?s=20
❤2
Just got $56 for registering on @RevenueFamily 👀 They gave me a $56 welcome bonus, but I can’t withdraw it until October 4th. I’m still a bit skeptical about the project, but I’ll take the bonus for now and DYOR properly later. If you still want to participate: → Head to: https://revenue.family/?ref=6CNGN5 → Connect your X account → Complete a few social tasks → Apparently, you can get up to a $600 welcome bonus …
🤝2
Showing the 12 most recent of 172 posts we hold for @grinderscorner. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@grinderscorner edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 28 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 28 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@goldfest_bot · 137,5776 postsATF
@ATF_AIRDROP_bot · 1,508,0075 postsngrnd_io
@ngrnd_io · 684 postsGold Fest
@goldfestgame · 393 postsrevenuefamily
@revenuefamily · 593 postsTelegram News
@telegram · 9,366,3113 postsGenLayer Community
@genlayer · 12,9502 postsSexseven
@sixsevenapp · 1,1842 postsSix Seven Club Bot
@Sixsevenclub_bot · 535,1842 postsAP Collective Hub
@APCollectiveHub · 571 postCove Trader
@covetrade · 71 postЯ строитель 👷♂
@dee_e61 postPavel Durov
@durov · 10,459,7321 postGAMEE | Community
@gameetoken · 1,3811 postGenius 🧠
@GeniusTerminal · 14,3561 postGtask Xgodo
@GmailMoneyTaskBot · 35,4971 postgxtexchange
@GXTExchange · 5081 postJumper
@jumperapp · 13,0241 postKaitoai
@Kaitoai · 2831 postCatapult Trade
@letsCatapult · 27,0981 postMaestro Ecosystem Portal
@MaestroBots · 167,8161 postCrypto traders
@taskonxyz · 1891 postInfluence360
@theinfluence360 · 1581 postWatcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 628,8031 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 10
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 3
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 7
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@grinderscorner named 10 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 2 posts, 25 August 2026 – 27 August 2026 · confirmed gone 7 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 10 August 2026 · confirmed gone 10 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 25 August 2026 – 25 August 2026 · confirmed gone 5 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 4 posts, 14 September 2026 – 24 September 2026
named in 3 posts, 16 August 2026 – 21 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 1 October 2026 – 4 October 2026
named in 2 posts, 1 October 2026 – 4 October 2026
named in 2 posts, 1 October 2026 – 4 October 2026
named in 2 posts, 11 September 2026 – 14 September 2026
named in 1 post, 27 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@dogs · 6,827,445#1
@TheAlphaArena · 8,396#2
@tonversalphas · 1,024#3
@hotonnear · 4,536,293#4
@catizenann · 3,480,004#5
@TonblockchainHausaa · 260#6
@tonnomads · 24,193#7
@theyescoin · 5,498,606#8
@tonfish_tg · 94,975#9
@tonfricana · 2,047#10
@Cryptomama100 · 27,094#11
@Digitekalphas · 15,160#12
@bloomstarbms · 25,069#13
@nothing_to_look_at · 11,119#14
@Tonfrica · 1,532#15
@PheyyiiAlphaChannel · 5,537#16
@babyj3suss · 2,325#17
@thisisnosa · 4,777#18
@BellickzGallery · 8,489#19
@cryptoranknews · 656,229#20
@alsobalo · 537#21
@samtopcrypto · 10,762#22
@HBQuarters · 25,430#23
@alphawith_moh · 687#24
@silverrockweb3channel · 91#25
@brainssignals · 26,955#26
@AlphasnValhalla · 7,195#27
@karlahdigitals · 1,431#28
@LolaCryptLab · 2,871#29
@liquidityfarmoors · 2,166#30
@ufocasino · 1,511#31
@All_Telegram_TON_News · 3,896#32
@fortizodao · 4,179#33
@erdfvj · 6,561#34
@Vindicatedspace · 29,367#35
@zerogamblers · 13,806#36
@WGTDAO · 22,281#37
@RidingExtreme · 202,350#38
@freshalpha_szn · 5,570#39
@brainsdegens · 16,708#40
@Quivira_hub1 · 3,485#41
@Xevscabal · 4,809#42
@cryptocoachpro · 31,664#43
@wilson_space · 34,970#44
@ThePeoplesHub1 · 522#45
@leverageairdrops · 1,413#46
@OGC_Announcements_Hub · 452,094#47
@DicksonBase · 6,186#48
@Bitget_Announcements · 1,525,787#49
@xghostrhelm · 6,255#50
@WAGMIGROUPCHANNEL · 558#51
@binadam61 · 12,527#52
@jaynecrypto · 5,216#53
@brawncrypto · 1,636#54
@FareaNFts · 12,848#55
@HappyfulOfWeb3Alpha · 1,144#56
@Lasvegazcity · 12,069#57
@HouseOfXeus · 24,923#58
@MhiztaLOELGEMALERT · 1,545#59
@waleAlphaHub · 18,512#60
@thedailyton · 251,848#61
@WONTONorg · 713,815#62
@degenon_ton · 4,937#63
@financialderaajournal · 1,550#64
@AirdrapCartel · 831#65
@web3_100k · 1,520#66
@tontias · 2,938#67
@Crypto4bailoutNews · 17,124#68
@farmercistjournal0 · 40,501#69
@aquaprotocolxyzchannelen · 741,842#70
@runestonfree · 2,552#71
@DiamondsVpnNews · 15,547#72
@careerswithJasperstevens · 403#73
@NastoikaNFT · 2,564#74
@tonjiggle · 1,892#75
@cupsysdiary · 769#76
@nftng24 · 957#77
@web3_360 · 184#78
@deuniqueweb3club · 202#79
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ToluwalogoAgboola · 21,153
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 24 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
9 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GRINDER'S CORNER” (@grinderscorner), 136,049 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/grinderscorner.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.