Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BIOTECHSCHOOL

Channel

BIOTECHSCHOOL

@biotech_life

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,339subscribers

-138 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001622778869
TypeChannel
Username@biotech_life
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/biotech_life

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,33911,47711,4087 August 2026 — 11,477 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,477 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,476 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,475 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,472 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,470 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,463 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,460 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,459 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,452 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,449 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,448 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,447 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,443 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,437 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,429 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,422 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,416 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,415 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,411 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,407 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,404 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,400 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,388 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,383 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,376 subscribers6 September 2026 — 11,366 subscribers9 September 2026 — 11,356 subscribers12 September 2026 — 11,350 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,348 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,343 subscribers17 September 2026 — 11,339 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 41 days, net -138. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,318–11,498 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 07:5911,339-4
15 Sept 2026, 06:1611,343-5
13 Sept 2026, 17:5911,348-2
12 Sept 2026, 01:5511,350-6
9 Sept 2026, 19:1611,356-10
6 Sept 2026, 09:3611,366-10
4 Sept 2026, 04:2011,376-7
2 Sept 2026, 18:5611,383-5
1 Sept 2026, 14:4311,388-12
31 Aug 2026, 11:0611,400-4
30 Aug 2026, 13:2611,404-3
29 Aug 2026, 11:5611,407-4
28 Aug 2026, 10:1611,411-4
27 Aug 2026, 08:3511,415-1
26 Aug 2026, 05:4211,416-6
25 Aug 2026, 03:0511,422-7
23 Aug 2026, 18:4911,429-8
22 Aug 2026, 06:1811,437-6
20 Aug 2026, 19:0211,443-4
19 Aug 2026, 18:1411,447first reading

Engagement

65 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.86%
avg views ÷ 11,339 subscribers
Avg views / post
551
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.60%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 65 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 24 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held65 (26 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total13,213
Reactions total201
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 00:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 15m
Average length
1m 16s

Measured directly from 59 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

648 reactions across 63 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥21933.8%
19730.4%
👍18829.0%
👏243.70%
😍81.23%
😁40.617%
20.309%
👎20.309%
🤩20.309%
🥰20.309%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 63 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 648 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
4.62%
3 of 65 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
3
posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
557
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
749
over 61 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqvQxm7q126 August 202626 August 2026
2VtzqwnfCHy113 August 202613 August 2026
2VtzqxJkuwq11 September 20261 September 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 14:03 UTC203 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

✨ ИДЕАЛЬНЫЙ МИНДАЛЬ БЕЗ «ГОРБАТЫХ» НОГТЕЙ Выкладной френч на миндале — форма, которая требует точной архитектуры и грамотного опила. На эфире разберём все нюансы, чтобы миндаль получался изящным, тонким и современным. 💅 Поговорим о: ▫️ моделировании миндаля; ▫️ правильной архитектуре формы; ▫️ опиле без «горба»; ▫️ пропорциях красивого выкладного френча. 📅 3 сентября | 18:00 (МСК) 📍 ВК-сообщество Biotech School З

3

2 Sept 2026, 10:04 UTC278 views11 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

ХРУСТАЛЬНЫЙ ФРЕНЧ, КОТОРЫЙ НЕ ХОЧЕТСЯ ПЕРЕКРЫВАТЬ ЦВЕТОМ. ✨ В прозрачных дизайнах есть одна проблема: стоит добавить лишний слой или неправильно распределить материал — и вместо глубины получаем мутный, тяжёлый кончик. Здесь всё строится на прозрачности: кристально-прозрачный гель сохраняет глубину, а жемчужины и поталь словно остаются внутри стекла. 💎 Именно за этот эффект выкладной френч хочется рассматривать сн

5🔥5👏1

1 Sept 2026, 14:03 UTC375 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Advertisementerid 2VtzqxJkuwqPhoto

Курсы • МОСКВА 🇷🇺 (14.09–24.09) 📍 м. Беговая (5 минут пешком) 👥 Группа — до 4 человек 15.09 — «Титановая нить, ТЕМПО, тейпы» 🧵 Деформированная ногтевая пластина, тампонада, тейпирование, установка титановой нити. ✨ 2 модели | 1 день | 25 000 ₽ 16.09 — «СЕКСИСИНУСЫ + плёнки» 🎞 Эстетическая обработка пальцев, плёночное покрытие и способы его закрепления. ✨ 2 модели | 1 день | 25 000 ₽ 19–20.09 — «Полный педикюр» 🦶

👍1

1 Sept 2026, 10:01 UTC400 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

«ЧЕМ ГУЩЕ ГЕЛЬ, ТЕМ СЛОЖНЕЕ С НИМ РАБОТАТЬ» — НЕ ВСЕГДА. Иногда именно плотный материал даёт мастеру тот контроль, которого не хватает жидким гелям. Можно спокойно сформировать внешний периметр, сохранить материал в нужной зоне, а затем дать ему выровняться там, где это необходимо. 💬 А какой гель вы выберете для чёткого квадрата — жидкий или высокой вязкости?

👍8

31 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC472 views11 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

ИНТЕРЕСНО, СКОЛЬКО МАТЕРИАЛОВ МЫ ИСПОЛЬЗУЕМ ПРОСТО ПО ПРИВЫЧКЕ? В классическом покрытии всё давно расписано по шагам: база, цвет, затем топ. 🫡 Но современные материалы позволяют пересмотреть эту последовательность! 🔥 Однофазный гель-лак объединяет все три этапа покрытия — и на этом примере хорошо видно, насколько по-разному можно организовать привычную работу. 💬 Кто уже перешёл на однофазники и теперь не хочет воз

11

30 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC524 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

🤔 ОДНОФАЗНИКИ ВЫЗЫВАЮТ МНОГО ВОПРОСОВ? Разобрали самые частые сомнения мастеров в нашем длинном видео 💅

2

30 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC600 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

🧐 ОДНОФАЗНИКИ: СОМНЕНИЯ, КОТОРЫЕ ЕСТЬ У ВСЕХ У однофазных гель-лаков один большой плюс — это простота. Но именно она вызывает у мастеров целый поток вопросов. 😅 «Без базы точно не отслоится?» «Без топа не потеряет блеск?» «Два слоя выдержит?» «А снимать как?» Поэтому показываем на практике, как развеять эти сомнения и спокойно работать с однофазным покрытием. 💬 А какой вопрос про однофазные гель-лаки до сих пор н

🔥72

29 Aug 2026, 11:17 UTC570 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

✨ Устали от рутины? Давайте добавим немного творчества! На прямом эфире создали лёгкие и стильные дизайны, которые отлично подойдут для 1 сентября и будут актуальны не только для школьного сезона. 🎨💅 Забирайте идеи для своих клиентов и вдохновляйтесь вместе со нами! 💜 📎 Сохранили запись эфира в нашем ВК-сообществе.

👍2

29 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC568 views15 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

КОГДА НОГОТЬ «КЛЮЁТ» — ПРОСТО ВЫРОВНЯТЬ ЕГО НЕДОСТАТОЧНО.☝🏻 Свободный край скручивается, боковые стенки тянет вниз, а после укрепления форма снова начинает уходить? В такой ситуации особенно важно правильно поднять архитектуру и удержать боковые стенки. В этом видео показываем, как сочетание полигеля и жидкого геля помогает получить изящную форму без компромиссов по прочности.👌🏻 💬 С какими ногтями вам сложнее все

🔥123

28 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC586 views13 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

КОГДА НУЖНО НЕ ПРОСТО ДРУГОЙ ЦВЕТ, А ДРУГАЯ КОНСИСТЕНЦИЯ Знакомая ситуация: оттенок идеальный, но материал совершенно не подходит для конкретной техники. Или наоборот — работать удобно, а нужного цвета нет. И что делать? Покупать ещё одну банку специально под одну задачу? Не обязательно. Иногда мастеру нужно не искать «тот самый» материал, а настроить его под себя. В этом видео показываем, как смешать гели с разн

🔥103

27 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC615 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

✨ Витражные ногти: когда прозрачность становится главным эффектом Кому-то мешает даже лёгкая прозрачность у кутикулы, а кто-то специально создаёт полностью прозрачные ногти, которые собирают все взгляды. 💎 В эфире разобрали: 💜 какие эффекты можно создавать с витражными гелями; 💅 как работать и моделировать прозрачные ногти; ✨ как сделать конструкцию аккуратной и красивой. И, конечно, создали эффектный витражный ди

👍21

27 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC598 views19 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

ИНТЕРЕСНО ПОСМОТРЕТЬ, КАК НОГОТЬ ВОССТАНАВЛИВАЕТСЯ ПРЯМО НА ГЛАЗАХ? Аппаратная обработка, восстановление недостающего участка — и форма снова выглядит аккуратно и естественно. ✨ 💬 Любите смотреть такие преображения?

👏127

Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @biotech_life. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@biotech_life edited 10 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
1 September 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Лаврентьева Алена
@alena_lavrenteva_nail · 64,992
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 11 September 2026
🔴 Дизайн ногтей | Маникюр
@nogtibel · 26,939
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 11 September 2026
САКРАМЕЛ
@sakramelschool · 36,521
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 11 September 2026
Пошаговый дизайн ногтей | Маникюр
@mkmanicur · 24,496
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BIOTECHSCHOOL” (@biotech_life), 11,339 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/biotech_life.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.