Posted without readable text
❤8👍3🔥2

Channel
@sakramelschool
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
36,521subscribers
-253 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001695158249 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sakramelschool |
| Description | Канал школы маникюра Sakramel💅🏻 Запись на курсы 👉🏻 https://t.me/sakramel_chat_bot или https://t.me/sakramel_marina |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sakramelschool |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 33% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 13:57 | 36,521 | -30 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 11:00 | 36,551 | -12 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:41 | 36,563 | -23 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 02:58 | 36,586 | -14 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 17:35 | 36,600 | +31 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 06:40 | 36,569 | -13 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 02:20 | 36,582 | -10 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:06 | 36,592 | -7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 36,599 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 36,604 | -11 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 36,615 | -16 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 36,631 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 20:08 | 36,634 | -8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:12 | 36,642 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 36,648 | -10 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 36,658 | -16 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:08 | 36,674 | -25 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:09 | 36,699 | -25 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 36,724 | -12 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:55 | 36,736 | first reading |
82 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 79 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 82 (28 July 2026 – 22 September 2026) |
| Views total | 73,220 |
| Reactions total | 508 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 13:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 45 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,090 reactions across 81 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 555 | 50.9% | |
| 👍 | 159 | 14.6% | |
| 😁 | 138 | 12.7% | |
| 🔥 | 78 | 7.16% | |
| 🤣 | 63 | 5.78% | |
| 🥰 | 27 | 2.48% | |
| 💯 | 12 | 1.10% | |
| 😱 | 12 | 1.10% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 0.917% | |
| 👌 | 9 | 0.826% | |
| 😘 | 9 | 0.826% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 0.459% | |
| 🤗 | 4 | 0.367% | |
| 💅 | 2 | 0.183% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.183% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.183% | |
| 🥱 | 2 | 0.183% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.092% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 82 of the 82 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,090 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 82 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
❤8👍3🔥2
Тратишь часы на наращивание, хотя хотела как раз ускорить работу? 🥲 Верхние формы действительно могут здорово экономить время, но только если правильно с ними работать. Иначе вместо быстрой постановки и четкого отпечатка, получаются ступеньки, толстый торец, кривизна и ещё полчаса на исправления 😅 Выше разобрали самые частые ошибки и почему их важно замечать ещё до полимеризации. А если хочешь наконец разобраться …
❤8
Вот почему верхние формы так легко полюбить 😍 Они позволяют спокойно выстроить форму и архитектуру, а дальше уже можно экспериментировать с дизайном и получать вот такую красоту 💅🏻 Когда техника действительно упрощает работу, творить становится намного приятнее ✨ Подписаться на Sakramel
🥰16❤6😘2
Интересные факты о маникюре, о которых вы могли не знать 💅🏻 А вы знали, что первое наращивание ногтя появилось благодаря стоматологу? 😳 Причём начал он совсем не с желания придумать новую технику. Просто однажды повредил ноготь и решил восстановить его тем, что было под рукой. Вот так случайная идея постепенно стала частью истории современного наращивания 👀 Подписаться на Sakramel
👍18❤4🔥2
Грязная изнанка👀 Если вы когда-либо работали с верхними формами, то наверняка сталкивались с такой неприятностью, как грязная изнаночная сторона ногтя. Согласитесь, довольно неприятно просушить гель, перевернуть руку и обнаружить там большое количество материала, который стёк к дистальному валику. И чтобы удалить весь этот материал, уходит очень много времени, приходится менять фрезы, чтобы приблизиться к коже🥲 А…
❤11👍2
Казалось бы, какая разница как держать инструмент, если результат один? 😄 Но именно из таких мелочей и складывается удобство в работе. Правильное положение инструмента помогает делать меньше лишних движений, лучше контролировать процесс и просто не усложнять себе маникюр. Согласны? Подписаться на Sakramel
🔥9👌6
Когда рабочее пространство продумано заранее, ничего не мешает, всё находится под рукой, а привычные процессы занимают меньше времени. В нашей школе таких решений много - всё-таки не зря её называют школой маникюра из Pinterest 😄✨ А если хотите не просто посмотреть, а побывать у нас и пройти живое обучение в Москве, пишите «МОСКВА» по ссылке 👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼 https://t.me/sakramel_chat_bot __________________________________ …
❤6👍1
Когда хочется вау-дизайн, но без трёх часов работы 😍 Верхние формы здорово упрощают задачу: быстро, аккуратно и без сложных манипуляций. Минимум времени — максимум эффекта 💅🏻✨ Согласны? Подписаться на Sakramel
❤25💯2
На видео верхние формы выглядят как самый быстрый способ моделирования. А в работе почему-то всё иначе 🫠 На одном клиенте форма отпечаталась идеально, а на другом затёк у кутикулы, пузыри, ступенька снизу или грязная изнанка. Положили меньше материала - появились проплешины. Больше - потом приходится долго выпиливать лишнее. И вместо обещанного ускорения получается наоборот: клиент пришёл в 10:00, следующий уже на…
❤8
Было такое: вроде форма подходит, материал хороший, а после снятия всё равно приходится долго пилить? 😩 Часто проблема начинается ещё на этапе примерки верхней формы. Её недостаточно просто подобрать по размеру. Важно учитывать ширину, изгиб и особенности конкретного ногтя 💅🏻 Если форма села неправильно, потом появляются лишняя толщина, не та архитектура или необходимость исправлять то, что можно было увидеть ещё д…
❤7👍4😁2❤🔥1
У мастера с любым опытом работы может возникать вопросы на, которые он не знает ответа🤨 Это могут быть вопросы по оборудованию, по материалам, по поиску клиентов, сервису, вопросы по различным техникам маникюра, по выравниванию, укреплению, покрытию цветом и т.д. И сейчас у вас есть уникальная возможность получить ответы на все эти вопросы. Задавайте свои вопросы под этим постом, а уже через несколько дней мы дади…
❤9👍2
Суперлегкий дизайн с эффектом дыма 💨 Повторили бы? Подписаться на Sakramel
🔥21❤3🥰2
Showing the 12 most recent of 82 posts we hold for @sakramelschool. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@sakramelschool edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“САКРАМЕЛ” (@sakramelschool), 36,521 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sakramelschool.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.