Самое важное о столь тяжёлом #bipolarschool
Куратор: Евгений Касьянов - со-автор книги "Биполярное расстройство. Гид по выживанию для тех, кто часто не видит белой полосы", а также создатель проекта "Психатрия & Нейронауки".
Created
28 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
51 measurements spanning 91 days, net +673. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,872–10,755 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 51
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 19:16
10,653
+5
3 Nov 2026, 21:49
10,648
+7
2 Nov 2026, 18:59
10,641
+9
1 Nov 2026, 21:20
10,632
+5
31 Oct 2026, 23:15
10,627
+19
30 Oct 2026, 21:40
10,608
+10
29 Oct 2026, 21:55
10,598
+7
28 Oct 2026, 22:19
10,591
+6
28 Oct 2026, 00:49
10,585
+2
27 Oct 2026, 02:30
10,583
-2
26 Oct 2026, 03:37
10,585
+2
24 Oct 2026, 08:15
10,583
+1
23 Oct 2026, 09:00
10,582
+11
22 Oct 2026, 05:56
10,571
+13
21 Oct 2026, 02:10
10,558
+21
20 Oct 2026, 00:51
10,537
+10
18 Oct 2026, 22:05
10,527
+5
17 Oct 2026, 19:38
10,522
+5
16 Oct 2026, 20:17
10,517
+5
15 Oct 2026, 20:26
10,512
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
45.2%
avg views ÷ 10,653 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,820
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
23 (5 June 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
28,900
Reactions total
439
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 08:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
292
Videos
1
Links
177
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
27m 18s
Average length
27m 18s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,442 reactions across 22 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,494
61.2%
🔥
406
16.6%
👍
198
8.11%
💯
67
2.74%
✍
46
1.88%
😭
39
1.60%
🙏
38
1.56%
❤🔥
20
0.819%
🤔
20
0.819%
👀
17
0.696%
👏
14
0.573%
💔
14
0.573%
🕊
12
0.491%
🥰
11
0.45%
🤝
10
0.41%
🖕
5
0.205%
😡
5
0.205%
💊
4
0.164%
😁
3
0.123%
😇
3
0.123%
8 further kinds
16
0.655%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,442 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 23 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bipolarschool. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 June 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
На Бусти сегодня снова три новости 🙂
🟠Во-первых, вышел большой обзор о лечении биполярного расстройства после первых эпизодов.
Разбираем, что известно о профилактике повторных эпизодов и почему первые годы болезни могут быть особенно важны для долгосрочного прогноза.
🟠Во-вторых, опубликован новый дайджест исследований биполярного расстройства.
В этот раз сразу четыре интересные темы: изменения липидов крови при б…
Как начинается биполярное расстройство? Теперь в аудиоформате 🟠
Почему почти две трети участников нашего опроса назвали депрессию первым эпизодом биполярного расстройства? Почему гипомания может годами оставаться незамеченной и что первый эпизод способен рассказать о дальнейшем течении болезни? Обсуждаем эти вопросы в первом аудиовыпуске Школы биполярного расстройства.
Мы решили попробовать новый формат: постепенно…
Меняется ли со временем сама клиника биполярного расстройства? 🟠
Если открыть старые руководства по психиатрии, депрессия иногда выглядит непривычно тяжёлой и почти телесной. Пациенты часами лежат неподвижно, перестают есть, страдают тяжёлыми запорами, выглядят истощёнными, лицо становится землистым, появляется неприятный запах изо рта. Сегодня такие картины встречаются гораздо реже и обычно ассоциируются с крайне т…
Ощущение времени при биполярном расстройстве 🟠
Люди с биполярным расстройством нередко описывают странное ощущение времени. Во время подъёма день может пролететь почти незаметно, а в депрессии несколько минут ожидания субъективно растягиваются до бесконечности. Систематический обзор экспериментальных исследований показывает, что за этим опытом может стоять измеримое изменение восприятия времени.
➡️Самое интересное …
На Бусти сегодня снова сразу три новости 🙂
🟠Во-первых, вышел большой обзор о том, почему при биполярном расстройстве так сложно создать универсальные рекомендации по лечению.
Исследования обычно разбирают биполярное расстройство по частям: отдельно манию, депрессию и профилактику. В реальной жизни врачу приходится одновременно учитывать прошлые эпизоды, текущее состояние и то, как сегодняшнее решение повлияет на те…
Как распознать приближение депрессии 🟠
У многих людей за несколько дней или недель до явного ухудшения появляются собственные ранние признаки, которые повторяются от эпизода к эпизоду. У одного человека внезапно усиливается тяга к сладкому, другой замечает, что первая утренняя сигарета больше не приносит привычного удовольствия, третий замечает, что музыка словно начинает звучать медленнее и тусклее. Именно такие ин…
Гипомания без радости 🟡
Иногда гипомания вообще не похожа на подъём. Сон сокращается, внутри всё ускоряется, а окружающий мир будто становится слишком медленным и раздражающим. Такое состояние легко принять за тревогу или просто «плохой характер».
В новых карточках разбираем, как может выглядеть гипомания без эйфории, почему важно смотреть на сон, энергию и скорость мыслей, а также чем такие состояния могут быть оп…
На Бусти сегодня снова сразу три новости 🙂
🟠Во-первых, вышел большой материал о диагностических границах биполярного расстройства.
Насколько надёжно мы сегодня разделяем манию и гипоманию? Любую ли депрессию у человека с БАР стоит считать «биполярной»? Разбираем провокационный обзор, авторы которого предлагают заново проверить некоторые привычные представления о структуре заболевания.
🟠Во-вторых, опубликован новый…
Что происходит с самооценкой после постановки диагноза? 🟠
Есть популярное представление, что постановка диагноза биполярного расстройства должна приносить облегчение. Наконец становится понятно, почему годами менялись настроение, энергия и способность функционировать. Для многих это действительно так. У других в этот момент начинается довольно болезненная перестройка отношения к себе.
➡️ Диагноз может неожиданно пр…
Подборка лучших материалов Школы биполярного расстройства 🙂
Собрали лучшие тексты в одном месте, чтобы к ним было проще возвращаться, пересылать близким и использовать как карту по самым важным вопросам.
➡️Общее
🟠Биполярное расстройство – это не маниакально-депрессивное заболевание
🟠Что такое норма изнутри и почему она лучше гипомании
🟠Почему у Ван Гога не было биполярного расстройства?
🟠Как заниматься спортом
🟠Ра…
🔥46❤37👍11🥰4🙏4🤯3
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @bipolarschool. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Mehdi Jahani @Mehdijahanich · 29,848 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 15 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Школа биполярного расстройства” (@bipolarschool), 10,653 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bipolarschool.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.