Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
57 measurements spanning 90 days, net -1,956. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,606–19,148 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 20:59
16,899
-25
3 Nov 2026, 17:01
16,924
-20
2 Nov 2026, 18:27
16,944
-20
1 Nov 2026, 15:18
16,964
-19
31 Oct 2026, 17:05
16,983
-27
30 Oct 2026, 16:15
17,010
-25
29 Oct 2026, 14:47
17,035
-24
28 Oct 2026, 17:09
17,059
-29
27 Oct 2026, 13:56
17,088
-29
26 Oct 2026, 15:45
17,117
-18
25 Oct 2026, 12:56
17,135
-9
24 Oct 2026, 13:36
17,144
-26
23 Oct 2026, 13:28
17,170
-33
22 Oct 2026, 10:47
17,203
-49
21 Oct 2026, 01:28
17,252
-27
20 Oct 2026, 00:56
17,279
-44
18 Oct 2026, 22:15
17,323
-16
17 Oct 2026, 23:06
17,339
-26
16 Oct 2026, 23:41
17,365
-15
16 Oct 2026, 01:37
17,380
first reading
Engagement
51 posts held, back to 21 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.05%
avg views ÷ 16,899 subscribers
Avg views / post
177
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 51 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held
51 (21 June 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total
1,947
Reactions total
8
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 04:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
500
Videos
185
Links
68
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
37 reactions across 22 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👏
16
43.2%
❤
13
35.1%
🔥
5
13.5%
👍
3
8.11%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 11 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🗞️ Weekly Crypto News
1. Binance Hit by $6.3 Billion Crypto Hack
The breach triggered sharp market losses and aggressive BTC put buying, with traders paying more for downside protection.
2. Bitcoin ETFs Record $643 Million in Outflows
Friday's withdrawals were the largest since June, raising fresh questions about institutional demand for BTC.
3. Nearly $11 Billion in BTC Options Reach Expiry
October's major monthl…
Altcoin season is coming!
... but does higher volatility mean better options trades? Not necessarily!
Here's what many beginners overlook:
🔹 1. Higher volatility = Higher premiums
When implied volatility (IV) rises, options become more expensive. You're paying more for the possibility of a big move.
🔹 2. Getting the direction right isn't enough
$ETH could rally 8%, yet your Call Option might still lose money if …
Theta Harvest vault is up almost 4% in its first 2 weeks, and @Evinho0x is adding $1,000.
Market: BTC $79,975 with liquidation heat just below, HYPE $81 to $89 in a morning, $331M liquidated in 24h (63% longs).
Plus his BTC 86K March call and ETH 2,600 December call.
Everton's last video as the face of Bitopex. Thank you for 2 great years, @Evinho0x.
https://youtu.be/GMQcwpTqYds
🗞️ Weekly Crypto News | October 27
1. $10.9B BTC Options Expiry Looms
Around $10.9 billion in BTC options are scheduled to expire on October 30. With large positions concentrated at key strikes, settlement and hedging activity deserve close attention.
2. Fed Decision Set for October 28
The Fed meets this week, with its rate decision and press conference on Wednesday. A change in rate expectations could quickly repr…
Why would a Bitcoin investor buy a put option if they're still bullish? 🤔
Because protecting your portfolio doesn't mean expecting a crash.
Here's how it works:
📉 You hold $BTC at $80,000.
🛡️ You buy a put option with a $75,000 strike price.
If Bitcoin falls to $65,000, your put gains value and helps offset losses on your holdings.
If Bitcoin rallies instead, you keep the upside on your Bitcoin. The put may exp…
New Bitopex video is live 🎥
Tom looks at the BTC short squeeze, liquidation heatmaps, and his expected move rule for selling weekly options. He also covers the Bitopex copy trading vault.
Watch here: https://youtu.be/eWWQtwS0xfY
🗞️ Weekly Crypto News | October 19, 2026
1. Bitcoin rebounds from a four-week low
BTC briefly dipped below $80K before recovering. Stronger US economic data and interest-rate uncertainty continue to drive sharp price swings.
2. BTC & ETH ETFs record fresh outflows
US spot Bitcoin ETFs lost $228M last week, with ETH funds shedding $320M. Institutional demand remains under pressure.
3. $12.4B in BTC options open int…
Bitcoin drops. Do you have to sell?
Not necessarily...
With $BTC under pressure, here's how a protective put works:
🔹 You hold Bitcoin and buy a put option.
🔹 The put gives you the right to sell at a fixed strike price.
🔹 If Bitcoin falls below that strike, the put can offset part of your spot losses.
🔹 If Bitcoin rallies, you keep your upside exposure.
The catch? Protection costs money.
You pay an option premium,…
🗞️ Weekly Crypto News | What Options Traders Should Watch
⚙️ BTC tests the $83K support zone Bitcoin slipped back into the low-$80K area, keeping traders focused on downside hedges and breakout triggers.
⚙️ Leverage rotates from
$BTC
to alts BTC open interest cooled while broader crypto open interest rose, a sign that leverage is moving away from Bitcoin and into higher-beta names.
⚙️ IBIT options stay active Bit…
Ever paid twice as much for a hotel room just because one busy weekend was coming up?
⚠️ Options can behave the same way.
Bitcoin’s short-dated implied volatility has been moving faster than longer expiries recently.
What does that mean?
If 1-week IV rises above 1-month IV, traders are paying more for exposure to the next few days.
Not necessarily for a move UP.
Not necessarily for a move DOWN.
They’re paying for m…
🗞️ Weekly Crypto News | What Options Traders Should Watch
❇️ BTC slips as dollar and yields rise
Bitcoin weakened as the dollar and Treasury yields moved higher. For options traders, Fed minutes, ETF flows, and spot demand are back in the driver’s seat.
❇️ U.S. regulators target leveraged crypto venues
The CFTC proposed new rules for crypto platforms offering leveraged or margined trades. Venue rules can change liq…
🤔 Is “Uptober” already priced into the options market?
If everyone expects $BTC to rally, call options can get expensive before spot even moves.
That price comes from implied volatility.
Higher IV = higher option premiums.
So you can be right on direction and still lose money if:
• the move is too small
• it comes too late
• IV drops after entry
For beginners, check 4 things before buying a call:
Expiry, Strike, I…
👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @bitOpexchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BitOpex Announcement Channel” (@bitOpexchannel), 16,899 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bitOpexchannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.